Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
ariana09 | 56 |
|
|
|
NBA_Fanatic | 66 |
|
|
|
sharpstick | 31 |
|
|
|
MR219 | 35 |
|
|
|
crowat | 12 |
|
|
|
sawman | 15 |
|
|
meaningless 3 by ebanks kills the parlay but I still like the logic...keep up the good work AFN..been following you in NFL
|
AFNfootballnerd | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by swanman87: Proplayerstatus is up to the minute and what's nice is it is a compilation of all this data pulled from various sources such as all the reporters for those teams posts from twitter. I highly suggest checking it out as I use to use rotoworld as as well b his is so much better. It's also free as I would never pay to get this info This looks very nice...good info
|
NBA_Fanatic | 14 |
|
|
your best bet is a combination of them all twitter is the quickest and I frequently check covers forums. i will be adding rotoworld to the rotation
|
NBA_Fanatic | 14 |
|
|
|
NBA_Fanatic | 30 |
|
|
replied to
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
in Website Promotions
Ty Lawson out tonight in DEN game
|
SportsMavin | 12682 |
|
|
BOL
Lets Start This Year off right |
NBA_Fanatic | 10 |
|
|
You'll bounce back...just going through a cooler
|
NBA_Fanatic | 12 |
|
|
Damn another rough night
|
NBA_Fanatic | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mikado: Good Luck in the Association today! Rondo and Barbosa should be back giving them a frontcourt lol If you don't mind me asking sir..where do you get your injury reports??? could you pm me info?
|
NBA_Fanatic | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd: Washington offense 14% Dallas 7% which I leaned Washington but I'm going with what has been hitting which is the consistency rankings You gonna be around next season? or was this a test run of sorts...hope to see you back next season
|
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd: Adding Minnesota +3 Greenbay consistency ranking 28 vs Minnesota ranked 4....an inconsistent greenbay on the road? Ill take Minnesota Picks week 17 Carolina +4.5 (large) Minnesota +3 (large) Minnesota +3 Tailed you on these...really hope you're around for the full season next year...remarkable..
|
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd: Adding Minnesota +3 Greenbay consistency ranking 28 vs Minnesota ranked 4....an inconsistent greenbay on the road? Ill take Minnesota Picks week 17 Carolina +4.5 (large) Minnesota +3 (large) Minnesota +3 |
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
|
NBA_Fanatic | 12 |
|
|
replied to
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
in Website Promotions Quote Originally Posted by Old-Jax: I don't profess to be any great handi-capper. I am a gambler with handicapping tendencies. I am not doing this for a living like SportsMavin, but I am also not spending all this time to not lose money. I see a lot of people in this thread bet a lot of games and have trouble not making a play. I can assure you long term, you will not make money like this. The reason for the above is I wanted to share something with money management I started doing a few years back that has changed me from a gambling loser to winner (again in perspective-I am not looking to retire from this). I carry two bankrolls. Call it a handicapping bankroll and a gambling bankroll if you will. The numbers aren't important, but I decided to set aside 10% of my roll for action plays. The nights where there is only one game and I know the degenerate in me needs some action. I am sure we have all spent hours looking over a Monday night football game and cannot come up with a side to play. Rather than risking a regular bet, I tap into by 10% roll. If me normal wager is $500, I am literally making a $50 action play on that particular game. I want to be clear, I only use this secondary bankroll when there is limited to nothing else going on and I just want an entertainment wager. Last night in this thread, I mulled over two games Bucks/Heat and Thunder/Rockets. With the help and input of the folks here, plus my own research I came up with two theories. From a basketball perspective, I loved the Thunder, but the line was telling me something different. I did not make a play at all. In theory, by not making a play, I lost an easy winner, but long term that type of bet will lose more than it wins. I settled on the Bucks as a solid play, both researching the basketball, public betting and line. I felt I made a solid play and had an easy win (of course the 3rd quarter got a little scary), but if you watched the game, it felt like the Bucks were taking their punch and were ready to respond. The point of the two stories above is not to tout my gambling prowess, it simply isn't that great. I wanted to point out, I DID NOT make the Thunder game part of an "action play," out of my secondary roll. Again, that bankroll is reserved solely for limited action. I had all the action I needed tailing SportsMavin's two plays and my one play (not to mention a few College Bball plays from throughout the day). I am not sure if this helps or if anyone even cares about the above, but I have enjoyed this thread and wanted to add a little something that really has helped me. If it does great, if not read and move on. SportsMavin, thanks again for putting together an informative thread that we can all use to make money. Good advice
|
SportsMavin | 12682 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.