Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
@DIRECTOR97 Maybe you should calm down. Also, why not just take easy Money line wins and count them towards your record? You're already misleading people so might as well inflate your numbers even more |
DIRECTOR97 | 11 |
|
![]() |
Nobody listen to him He has posted things like this a few times before (claiming he has some insider info) and was wrong. Only make bets that you are confident in, do not bet based on what others say unless you legitimately believe the person is right |
nbascout888 | 12 |
|
![]() |
@cheetahmsl So you're saying no team has gone on a 0-4 ATS run this season? This is not true, so I think I'm misunderstanding what you're saying |
cheetahmsl | 24 |
|
![]() |
@cheetahmsl Can you please elaborate on what this A B C D progression (or chase system) is? |
cheetahmsl | 24 |
|
![]() |
@AMaciso Possible let-down spot for the Bulls If Brogdon was playing, I'd take Pacers ML without thinking twice But the fact that he is out makes this game tricky |
beatyourbook2 | 15 |
|
![]() |
Tough game to call Lakers are terrible against the spread But this is a very possible let-down game for Memphis I was leaning on Memphis but I won't touch this game - too tricky |
Jerseyboy89 | 3 |
|
![]() |
Miami 3rd game in 4 nights (same with Spurs, but Spurs don't have to travel and aren't on a back-to-back) Miami missing almost everyone (only have Herro, Robinson, Caleb Martin, Yurtseven, and Garrett) Spurs have been quite good lately I think this is one of the bets of the week.... Spurs -5.5
|
DarioTheRealO | 6 |
|
![]() |
As I already mentioned, the line moved approximately 2 hours before the Garland news broke out, so it has nothing to do with that (unless, again, as I previously mentioned, someone had insider info and bet big on the Pels before the Garland news was announced) |
DarioTheRealO | 19 |
|
![]() |
@PGAromes82 The Garland news came out way after the line moved, so it isn't that (unless someone had insider info and placed a large bet before the Garland news was announced) |
DarioTheRealO | 19 |
|
![]() |
@PGAromes82 Valanciunas, Ingram, and Hart were not placed into COVID protocols though
I'm really thinking it's a whale that bet on the pelicans Because there was no news that came out that explains the line movement |
DarioTheRealO | 19 |
|
![]() |
Anyone have any info on this?
I didn't get any news regarding either of the two teams. Only explanation I can think of is a whale betting on the Pelicans |
DarioTheRealO | 19 |
|
![]() |
@stinkroach I would say Oddshark best reflects the sentiment of bettors (because according to Oddshark, they get their numbers directly from oddsmakers).
You can also use other sites such as Covers. However, their numbers aren't as accurate because they have a smaller sample size of bettors. |
DarioTheRealO | 5 |
|
![]() |
I've looked at multiple sources online and it seems like most of the public (around 75% or more) is betting on Golden State -6. However, the line hasn't moved as one would expect (for example to -7 or -8). For those that don't know, this can sometimes mean that the bookies think Memphis will end up covering so they don't want to give them an even larger advantage and push the line to +8 for them. I was already leaning towards Memphis, and this makes me more confident in them. Memphis +5.5
As always, when betting spreads, you can't just take one angle into account, you must look at many different factors. Bet with caution. |
DarioTheRealO | 5 |
|
![]() |
As the others mentioned, it's only for back-to-back games |
DarioTheRealO | 17 |
|
![]() |
|
DarioTheRealO | 17 |
|
![]() |
@Raider4life22
It has nothing to do with them taking the train, it's just named that way It's just a weird phenomenon that somehow magically works most of the time.
There's also the fact that it's the Bucks' third road game across four days. And the Celtics came back home from a poor road trip, they're looking to bounce back.
Best of luck |
DarioTheRealO | 17 |
|
![]() |
If you know, you know
Celtics +1
This might be the only time it occurs this season |
DarioTheRealO | 17 |
|
![]() |
@joshfactor I know, I don't completely disagree But past results may give some insight into what may happen later on
For example, let's say a team is 12-4 ATS That means that they're being underestimated, which may continue on into the future (just look at the Cavs' record, bookmakers have been underestimating them quite a bit recently).
Also, I don't solely use past trends to forecast future performance. I do take them into account, along with many other factors. |
DarioTheRealO | 4 |
|
![]() |
@JDodds Is the 62% record for SU or ATS? I'm assuming it's for SU |
JDodds | 17 |
|
![]() |
So I've noticed that when teams go on a road trip, they tend to play against the Lakers and Clippers on back-to-back nights.
I was wondering if anyone knows where we can find a stat that shows the ATS record of the second game (based on whether the first game was a Win/Loss)?
Or something similar to this. |
DarioTheRealO | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.