Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Advise
|
gsprush | 12 |
|
|
I clearly misread your explanation, Thorpe. Thanks! And thanks Esplanade
|
gsprush | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe: If you want to figure stuff out like this, then American styles are not what you need to use. Switch over to EU style. -105 = 1.952 +120 = 2.2 Then, assuming you are betting 100 on the +120 side, then you need to bet 100 times 2.2/1.952 = 112.70 on the -105 side. That way you win the same amount (220 minus orginal investment of 212.70) no matter who wins the game. Wouldn't that then yield (120-112.70) on the +120 and (120-100) on the -105? While risk free, that's not the equilibrium profit point on both sides? |
gsprush | 11 |
|
|
What is the math needed to find the equilibrium profit point if you're able to get, say -105 at one book and +120 at another, and want to arb some (exact) small profit regardless of who wins? I can do this by trial and error and find it, but unable to figure out what the exact math formula is.
Thank you |
gsprush | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by brianx: Haase not looking good. Do you still like over in Thiem? Of course he still likes it. n3g doesn't waver. He handles his business like a professional |
n3gative | 17 |
|
|
lol 8 straight games for djoko. Djok set 1 6-0 was the better +1400ish bet than cilic ml lol
|
gsprush | 4 |
|
|
For 0.25 units
|
gsprush | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by n3gative: man, that was an odd performance from Stan. I don't think I've ever seen a 1:10 Winner-Error Ratio in any match by a decent player. Of course he plays doubles right after with his new bf Paire and takes down a solid doubles team...go figure. 1-2 -1.27 (YTD 55-52 +28.44) They've been a couple for a while now. Cute Paire, those two ;) |
n3gative | 19 |
|
|
Big d.ick n3g strikes again. Of course he does.
|
n3gative | 19 |
|
|
I know it's easy to say afterwards, but 5u on Edouard? Jesus. I wouldn't have put 5u on Edouard if he was +180 against Joao, let alone -180
|
acoz01 | 2 |
|
|
Miller beat Bocek in Jers
|
sawman | 31 |
|
|
replied to
Got absolutely destroyed tonight..need a winner bad..anyone have any overnight calls?
in Tennis
Sorry to hear. Even the professionals and recreational long term winners get killed in short term. The very best do go on 0-8, 0-9 type runs.
Go with the Bromerican Jack "off in a" Sock at +105ish. Eye test this week tells me he wins. |
riddlemethis99 | 4 |
|
|
replied to
Got absolutely destroyed tonight..need a winner bad..anyone have any overnight calls?
in Tennis
Sorry to hear. Even the professionals and recreational long term winners get killed in short term. The very best do go on 0-8, 0-9 type runs.
Go with the Bromerican Jack "off in a" Sock at +105ish. Eye test this week tells me he wins. |
riddlemethis99 | 4 |
|
|
Goose -
CG didn't bet today? |
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rocky654: surely ..Women's tennis is literally the most competitive sport in the world impossible to accurately assess, of course. |
AStefani | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rocky654: surely ..Women's tennis is literally the most competitive sport in the world in theory it absolutely ought to be in a normative sense. |
AStefani | 10 |
|
|
CG spent+lost 28k. 16.8k are his gambling losses. This is 3.4k more than his deficit was entering Wisc bomb. I hope it's job time and not 401k time but we'll see
|
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CincyWillie: What's his running total at before the Dodger game? -16.3k i believe |
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
|
Goose,
Keep us posted. This show is far from over. Though it seems it'll be on a different station. |
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mafioso: This isnt work and more importantly since when is calling someone a phaaaaaaaag more serious then calling someone the N word The happy agenda is strong at covers isnt it? It's not. it was his second offense, though. He'd be banned if he called someone the N word for a second time, too |
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.