Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeKaptn:
Quote Originally Posted by Handsdown: Dan has them as a favorite at his book. I got Bos as -105 and StL as -115. I just follow his plays and cash after the games are done. Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24: Dan, I couldn't find Boston as a favorite anywhere, just as a pick em. I'm confused why they count as a play.Wanted to wait to see what lines did. Here we go...Wednesday, Game 4, STL -110 and Bos -110, $75 to win $198.35I wouldn't be surprised if you can find better odds than this if you have access to multiple books. When both sides are -110, neither side is technically a "favorite," as the system implies it should be. I'm not trying to be critical, just trying to clarify the parameters of the system. |
Danrules24 | 4279 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
Wanted to wait to see what lines did. Here we go...Wednesday, Game 4, STL -110 and Bos -110, $75 to win $198.35I wouldn't be surprised if you can find better odds than this if you have access to multiple books.
Dan, I couldn't find Boston as a favorite anywhere, just as a pick em. I'm confused why they count as a play. |
Danrules24 | 4279 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24: Good question. What I usually do is compare the lines on multiple books. Quite often one of the two is a larger fave a majority of the time. In a case where it is too close to call, I hunker down and do some old fashion handicapping and go with it. Appreciate the quick answer, Dan.
|
Danrules24 | 4279 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24: Yes there is and as of now, that game would be one we are on. Question for you, Dan. Sorry, don't want to read through the entire thread looking for this answer. If there is one big road fav, say a -150, and then just two other road favs both with identical odds, say both at -115, which of the two -115 games do you take?
|
Danrules24 | 4279 |
|
|
Email sent. Thx!
|
viro | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Zero. They get paid by the books. Email me if you want a summary on how it works. Sent a friend request and a PM. Thanks.
|
viro | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Not directly with Pinnacle, but with a broker like Asian Connect. They get you the account at Pinnacle and MB. How much does AsianConnect charge to bet through them? I am seeing nothing on their site regarding this.
|
viro | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Hold the phone.... There are 2 ways to use BTC to bet. The first is to buy btc, bet in btc, withdraw in btc, and then cash btc. This method opens you up to btc fluctuations. If you aren't interested in that risk, then keep reading... The second is to simply use btc as an electronic transfer method. Basically, the neteller of today. You buy btc, send btc to book, book converts to currency (you were only in BTC for about an hour). Then, when you WD, book buys btc, sends you btc, you sell btc for dollars (you were only in btc for about an hour). A side benefit of using btc as a transfer method is that it opens up new options (like pinnacle and matchbook) and bypasses the UIGEA. So don't throw the baby out with the bathwater here. You can transfer large amounts almost instantly with no risk of devaluation, bet at the lowest price books on the planet, and transfer funds between books instantly and free. I suggest you look in to it. If you're an American player you can now use Pinnacle by transferring money back and forth via Bitcoin? I looked on Pinny's site and didn't see anything regarding BTC deposits.
|
viro | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tenplay: Lots of online articles on the Martingale. It is the oldest "strategy" for any form of gambling and is 100% certain to lose in the long run. Actually, that isn't true. The only reason people always lose with the Martingale is because they run out of money to put in another, larger bet. For example, if your 1st bet was to win $100, and your bankroll was $100,000, the Martingale would almost certainly work. You just need a large enough of a bankroll to keep putting in the larger bet. No one loses every single bet. The problem is most people don't have this sort of bankroll to play with so it's a waste of time to try it. |
SinCityTwist | 47 |
|
|
Kirk Gibson is a moron, too
|
malta | 8 |
|
|
It makes no sense whatsoever. Miami has one hitter that's a threat and it's Stanton. Giving him anything to hit there was the most stupid thing they could have done and it cost them the game.
|
malta | 8 |
|
|
They are doing construction around there now and it is pretty hectic. Flamingo is not the best place to stay. Pretty ancient place.
|
ebpadjen | 6 |
|
|
Florida -110
Toronto +150 Calgary over 5.5 even money Dallas under 5 +105 |
Lippsman | 35 |
|
|
Wild -105
Jets +105 |
Lippsman | 31 |
|
|
Dallas +105
Nashville +145 |
Lippsman | 41 |
|
|
The whole reason they lost was because of Pete Orr and that idiotic error he made. Philly had the game won if it wasn't for that one incident.
|
mbullitt04 | 9 |
|
|
The Giants could barely qualify as a AA team.
|
bettor2win | 2966 |
|
|
Yesterday it was errors and a passed ball that led to Miami's first 2 runs and now today, another error leads to Miami's first run.
|
bettor2win | 2966 |
|
|
I hope Ryan Theriot gets the clap
|
bettor2win | 2966 |
|
|
The Giants offense is truly pathetic.
|
bettor2win | 2966 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.