itakcash

A dunk that clearly went the "hoop" got tangled in the net and came back out somehow. The ball made it completely through the cylinder. They reviewed it and still didn't count it. WTF? Anyone know the rule here. Cost me my 2nd half play.

Am I the only one that thinks these refs are calling this very one-sided in favor of Wichita State? VanVleet crashes into the defender and he goes flying and no charge. Meanwhile, several crucial charging calls against UNLV.  Even the foul on the 3 point shot in the first half. Not sure how that was ruled a 1 and 1.

my local uses an online book with no posted rules on there. what is the general rule for grading a 3-team teaser in which 2 teams are winners and 1-team is a tie?

help/thoughts are appreciated.

^ this is precisely what I was thinking, but I lost my straight up play since I locked in early (so obviously those key numbers mattered). Buffalo 18-17 win.  "can't play defense for garbage"........lmao. they let up a pick 6, so the defense gave up 10 points. damn missed extra point cost me the cover potentially.

teasers still in play

thanks fellas.....letting it ride

Have this card locked from before.

Buffalo -2

Miss St. -8

Western mich -14 (bought hook)

TEASERS (10 pts)

 bengals -2/baylor -7/buffalo +8 (LARGE)

baylor -7/buffalo +8//western mich -4.5

TEASERS (6-7 pts)

Baylor -10/miss st -.5/ miss st-mizz under 50.5

Bengals -5.5/miss st -2.5/ miss st-mizz under 49

Bengals -6/western mich -8.5/miss st -2

BOL

in a matter of 5 minutes, my book changed them from -2.5 to +1.5 and I can't find any news that would cause this 4 pt swing. anyone have any ideas/info?

i jumped on buffalo at -2 large when i saw the first small drop, but now i'm nervous.

Buffalo is +1.5 in mine now. Anyone know why? I already went large on them.

longest fg over 45.5 yds (2 units)

i'm banking on at least a few long field goal attempts with these defenses. BOL

airforce -3 2nd half (large-5 units)

airforce/Hawaii over 23.5 2nd half (2 units) 

Stanford/wash over 26.5 2nd half (2 units)

valid point. pretty sure the bulk of the money was on duke as well. maybe they were simply stalling for 9 minutes while money was wired into their bank accounts

they seem to make up rules as they go. CLEAR EVIDENCE needed to overturn. if it takes 9 minutes, it's not that clear!!! hmmmmm......and like I stated above. I've never known penalties to be reviewable. seems like an incredible suspect time to start doing so. changes $$ between a lot of hands.

slamming airforce -3 large (they are running it down Hawaii's throat and I think they cover this even if they score a td or 2 and take their foot off the gas)

hitting airforce/Hawaii over 23.5 (almost a hedge on my giant bet above, but I think I can hit both of these)

mad about the Stanford game and the duke debacle play, so tread carefully, this could be an emotional play. (i'm down on the week, but up pretty solid on the day, for what it's worth) BOL

I had duke ml as the last leg of a teaser and i'm obviously annoyed, but since when do they review judgemental penalty calls?  they don't go back to look at holding/pass interference calls, so how can they take 9 minutes to reverse a block in the back that was announced on the field?

on the first half large. 3 team teaser (Stanford -.5, stan/wash under 69.5, clippers -3.5).........2 team teaser (stan -4.5, airforce -.5)