Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@leventis72 Let’s go GK! |
leventis72 | 128 |
|
|
@McXmaster They played and lost to IND, I thought they were better? |
circa | 15 |
|
|
BOL this season Bad
|
badlands | 14 |
|
|
SF +7
SF-DEN U 48.5 PIT -3.5 PIT- HOU O 44.5 3U to win 39U |
jwm5050 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
BOL Mac, one thing though, that Sportsnetwork article also predicted a 27-17 Niner victory hahaha... I bought into Excel communication in the 90s while stationed in Alaska. Some of their propaganda showed a news clipping they were a climbing communication company ranked lets say 30th then a year later same news outlet with a clipping showing them 49th. Still ranked in the top 50 but dropped 19 spots in a year. Google it. BOL but trigger has been pulled on the better team with their eye on the prize... a game up on SEA in the division. |
Macwestie1 | 47 |
|
|
Team Rankings pick is STL +3 and O 44 Numbers Fire is STL +3 and O 44 FootballOutsiders is STL +3.5 Wunderdog is SF -3 and U 44 Up tempo team like PHI and NYG went under 51 last night. Now two slower teams have a chance to push the number over 44 tonight? Advantage SF coaching, QB, RB, defense. Advantage STL home in prime time and QB will little tape to prepare for. SF knows they can pick up a game with a win tonight, but STL plays SF tough. Where's the value in either the PS or O/U? |
bpickin | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Metallica2467: GL tonight Buddy Metallica sold me the farm last night w/o any cows jeez! |
amd | 127 |
|
|
Excellent call Bad
|
badlands | 13 |
|
|
Clemson +7
Haven't won in Chapel Hill in 15 yrs. UNC struggling this yr. I like Clemsons chances BOL to all |
jwm5050 | 7 |
|
|
O 46 and SF ML
|
kylemoney22 | 11 |
|
|
great job Mr. WhiteMice fantastic job tonight. Even the f'ing "experts" got this one wrong.
|
WhiteMice | 29 |
|
|
my lean is Baylor...
Fading myself... UCF +11.5 & U 41.5 |
Neef | 7 |
|
|
I know right! I was luck just someone lay the fuk down! Too much drama for my heart man, last leg of a four teamer parlay that hit thank God :)
|
StockerX1 | 13 |
|
|
DAL/PHI O 52.5 It's my own fault, here's why... Dal not a good team to begin with w/o Romo Knew the emphasis was going to be getting D. Murray the ball which equals less chance of big plays AND a backup QB big game in prime time who had zero snaps going into the game Pick didn't hit so got my $40 back, but still lost 10x that so lesson learned. I've used Ben Burns a few times the last couple of seasons but Teddy F'd me good last night. I guess if Dallas gets TDs instead of those 2 FGs and PHI scores a damn TD from the 1 (stupid play call) then I'd celebrating his pick, but today he sucks |
jwm5050 | 4 |
|
|
YOU SUCK BRO... THAT IS ALL. |
jwm5050 | 4 |
|
|
Awesome job today man, bowling outta control
|
Metallica2467 | 40 |
|
|
Wrong side is favored*
|
Metallica2467 | 40 |
|
|
Some might say the wrong time is favored here. I know the dual QB thing was holding the offense back a little bit this year in reference to getting a solid rhythm but with Renner out and now only one QB is that part of your play on UNC today?
|
Metallica2467 | 40 |
|
|
You're Vegas, just like last night. I watched Pitt get beat down by Miami a few weeks ago and that lasting memory added to watching Bowling Green beat down N. Ill recently was a recipe for disaster. Better conference, tougher schedule is going to give you more losses. minus dramatic turn overs or mis ques just like OSU beat Boise, Pitt was suppose to beat BG, Maryland is suppose to beat Marshall, and Washington will beat BYU. I'm wondering about ND going against Rutgers 117-118? Ranked pass defense. Does that mean they open it up and exploit them or will Rutgers be up for a game to beat ND
|
CalBear | 41 |
|
|
I need a Christmas miracle!
1H U 102.5 FG O 208 FG LAC +3 |
jwm5050 | 1 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.