Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Well it won't be for too long.
I won't even come here anymore. I'm sure I can find other forums out there.
The thing is, I don't even really make much picks for the handicapping contests or care about any stars if thats the case.
I was banned for supposedly wanting an alias, but its clear that I have no reason for benefiting off one. And if I really wanted one, wouldn't I just made one much earlier after I kept posting losing picks on the forum? Read some of my posts and it clearly stats me saying I'm the most pathetic unlucky bettor.
||an_cheers.gif' border=0> to everyone, I'm out!
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
wagerline forums are getting pathetic.
time to find a new one.
its funny how the moderators can't understand that a lot of people share computers.
brothers,
fathers/sons
college roommates
co-workers
Ever heard of a internet hub where it allows up to 5-8 computers connected to the same IP address?
|
$maker | 19 |
|
![]() |
its okay! if i knew multiple accounts from the same IP and accounts that happen to have the same password led to a ban, I would have never done so. its funny though because i asked him what his pw wanted to be and he said "whatever"
To accuse a member for wanting an alias based on that reason is not valid from what I can see. I already stated I have no reason for wanting an alias.
and again, ITS FREAKY THAT WAGERLINE LINESMEN GETS TO VIEW MEMBERS PASSWORDS.
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
thats a little FREAKY that wagerline linesman gets to look at member's passwords.
but yeah, i was the one who signed up for him and told him he can change his password if he wants. i was also the one who typed in his post for him. but whats that got to do with me wanting a fake alias?
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
what crime!? whatever its fine. its not like i need an alias anyways. most people already know I suck at betting.
but to justify a ban on a member who has 400+ posts because theres two accounts on the same ip is no where in the rule. the alias is just an assumption if you look at it logically.
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
He'll be here all day watching so he won't be able to post on his computer till tomorrow or tonight.
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
is my friend who I told to sign up today and posted on my account.
Whats the reason for banning?
|
lowmandown | 22 |
|
![]() |
GRANDSLAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Woot, what way to break out of your slump when I have large on Red Sox RL!
|
lowmandown | 3 |
|
![]() |
Exactly why Atlanta got rid of his ass.
He NEVER does anything when needed. Seriously, should have just PH for him or something |
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
Freaking LaRoche is up...inning is over
|
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by anj109: WOW the fucking pirates suck at hitting.... Exactly why I'm not even going to bother watching the game. Its better to get some work done then sit and watch this crappy team. I'll just be getting updated via sportsline. Cheers. |
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by BoSox829: Game is tied in the fourth. Yea Cubs will go ahead, but have you not seen relief pitching this week? Its just my luck lately. For me to get a come from behind win is really rare. Plus its the Pirates. If they can't hit against Hill, Cubs relief will just do the job as easily. So yeah, pirates backers most likely lost from what I can see....Its only 1-3, but towards the 7th, 8th, it'll be 2-7? 2-6? |
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
HAHA, just like that game is over.
I don't see Pirates winning anymore at all. GG |
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
They don't look too motivated to me! 0-6 with RISP!
|
lowmandown | 8 |
|
![]() |
0-6 Now, haha
|
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
Freaking Paulino, It'll be 2-0 now if he didn't swing the high fastball on the 3-0.
|
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
1-0 Pirates
|
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
I pounded the Pirates and have a real good feeling.
Snell looks good this year and it will be his "break out, I'm going to make a name for myself" year. Pirates win 5-3 |
RubberSoul | 177 |
|
![]() |
I'm playing the Pirates for LARGE.
I don't see the Cubs winning 7 in a row against them. |
AgainstDaConsen | 12 |
|
![]() |
Cubs haven't seen Snell this year. This guys got some new stuff and velocity. If he goes 6.5 innings, I see Pirates winning 5-3, 6-3.
As with Hill, Pirates already saw them and they lost. This time around they'll hit a little better and will get runs.
Pirates also just got swept by the Cubs, one game where it went 12? innings or so....they are coming to Wrigley with motivation today.
|
lowmandown | 8 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.