Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I wish armadillo still gave us hot/cold teams and over/under trends like last year, made it so easy to have it all in one place
|
tinfoils | 17 |
|
|
SMU is -15 ATS and -1600 ML
Kentucky is -14 ATS and -2250 ML Someone explain this to me?
|
MikeR87 | 4 |
|
|
Loss for words
|
MikeR87 | 3 |
|
|
Any way Duke doesn't win this game by 20+? Too good of a coach for a let down game. FSU is just terrible.
|
MikeR87 | 9 |
|
|
Doesn't even matter because WVA can't handle TCU. This NCAAB season is so stupid.
|
Eagles987 | 5 |
|
|
I am on the worst losing streak of my life and just needed them to win, not cover the -11, which was low, because dartmouth is absolute trash. I stopped following at 43-29...and to my surprise, they just imploded. I'm about to implode
|
Eagles987 | 5 |
|
|
10 team parlay....Arizona(NCAAF) pulls out a miraculous win for me, SFU rallies in the 4th....need one more game...and USC is playing like absolute dogsh*t against a garbage team...
|
MikeR87 | 2 |
|
|
I have been betting college football all year, but can not seem to figure out the MAC, other than pounding the Umass over on a weekly basis. Looking at the numbers, it appears NIU can't stop anyone, (besides Kent St.) and Ball St. has been putting up points lately. Ball St. has also struggled to keep the other team off the board, and NIU is one of the stronger offenses in the MAC. Is over 63 tonight a pretty safe bet?
|
MikeR87 | 3 |
|
|
I took over 7.5...at +105...Thanks guys
|
MikeR87 | 7 |
|
|
Played Reds and Brewers -1.5....5 units each, one W one L, +2.5 Units
Tonights plays: Giants RL +157 Orioles ML +123 Stupid Parlay: Bet $45.00 to Win $1541.83 05/15/14Baltimore Orioles+123 20:10 ETListed 05/15/14San Francisco Giants-1.5 22:15 ET(+157) 05/15/14New York YankeesOver 7.5 19:10 ETNew York Mets(-105) 05/15/14San Diego Padres (GM 2)-111 18:10 ETListed 05/15/14Los Angeles Angels-152 22:05 ETListed YOUR TOTAL BETTOTAL POTENTIAL WIN $ 45.00$ 1541.83 |
MikeR87 | 1 |
|
|
I can't figure out what the deal is with first start pitchers. Is the play here Over because it's their first start against major league hitters? Or Under because the batters have never seen them and they have solid AAA numbers? Help
|
MikeR87 | 7 |
|
|
Baylor 1H -2
Baylor/Ok St Over 143 Want to take UNC, but just can't pull the trigger
|
MikeR87 | 1 |
|
|
Ok...some one convince me not to unload on Baylor -4.5.
OK st has been an underachieving team all season WITH Smart. They have looked like garbage without him. I feel like the lines makers have been giving this team too much credit the past couple weeks especially. On the flip side Baylor looks like they've gotten past that earlier season hump and they're playing solid ball.
|
MikeR87 | 4 |
|
|
Awesome effort....so pathetic
|
MikeR87 | 1 |
|
|
BC LOVES to play the top teams close…then get pounded by the Harvard's of the world on a yearly basis...
|
tomhawkmissile | 8 |
|
|
The lock yesterday was Chattanooga and we can see how close that game was...
Don't see why this is only -3.5....Murray St far better team... Thoughts welcome
|
MikeR87 | 6 |
|
|
This could be a huge trap game but I've watched Davidson a few times and there is nothing there…they've lot a few game this year to teams much worse than Chattanooga…I can't believe they don't stay within 11…Thoughts?
|
MikeR87 | 1 |
|
|
Wisconsin Milw. +6.5 at Oakland
Toledo -3 at W Michigan Drexel +1.5 at William Mary Minnesota -1.5 at Penn St E Michigan -1 at BG Richmond +2.5 at St. Bonnies (Biggest standout to me…) Missouri St PK at Bradley Illinois St. +17 at Wichita UNM -3 at Wyoming Utah +2.5 at Washington I know the road is a factor…but I love all of these lines…So obviously most will miss…Any standout for others as well?
|
MikeR87 | 3 |
|
|
wtf is that…had ecu +10.5…why call a time out there even if you have one? Asshole
|
MikeR87 | 6 |
|
|
I know USC is not a great team but they have some athletes. Beat a decent (yet horribly underachieving BC squad easily). LBST is not a good team. Why's this line so low?
|
MikeR87 | 2 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.