NaMe_In_LiGhTs

Cleveland +4.5 Indy travels for emotional first game home: Gimme the Cavs +4.5

Atlanta shuts locker room after embarassing loss at home. Makes this a team meeting game: Hawks -3 is what I like.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Othe Stuff

Cavs ML+155 A little revenge for the 18pt. thumping.

Washington -1.5 in first half. 76ers have been slow starters.

Detroit + 9.5 These games have been close in the past

LAL-8 and the over. Long roadtrip with super bowl in the middle.

7/27

unders only: Nats, Mets, Astros, Brewers, Giants and Rangers

My Play: Yanks, Rangers and Rangers Under

NIL

Good Luck Bettors!!!!

Two Props under :

Jamison +/- 25 points and rebounds

3 pointers made +/- 12.5:

if you can still bet on the series, take Cavs if the risk is reasonable

KG definitely painted Antwan out of the game tonight. No surprise: he's 4 to 5 inches taller with 80 plus inch wingspan. KG got 10 rebounds and 18 points. AJ got 9 rebounds and 7 points, and annoyingly missed two straight FTs in the 4th qtr.

Next game, Cavs will be much sharper and won't trail at the half. If you can get a cheap moneyline before game day, by all means, do it.

The Celts are toast...6 games tops. (I really believe it will be 5) Cavs are just a bad match for them.

nil

nil

I like the under better... but good luck anyway (like tomorrow or something)

nil

POD: Cleveland -7 , 7.5

**********************************

TWO*TEAMER: Celts/Cavs Under

GOOD LUCK BETTORS!!!

NIL

POD: Jazz -3.5

TWO*TEAMER: Bucks +1.5

also like: Lakers+1

numbers based on LV Hilton first sheets.

GOOD LUCK BETTORS!!!!!

NIL

Thanks for inspiring me to check out that Jazz/Nuggets total. I believe I'm on the over with real bucks

Good Luck!

nil

We are on one of the longest money winning streaks since we hooked up in a common interest. Wouldn't have been possible without L's steady skepticism and sports experience.

Thanks L!!!!

POD: Nuggets -7 series looks like it's going 7games to me. Nuggets are going through tough times but they havn't collapsed...yet. It's very difficult to beat and cover against a team 3 games in a row..

TWO*TEAMER Hawks -9. this game worries me because the Bucks now know the Hawks just are not that  great a team and (2) the Hawks don't have a super*star, don't let us lose player and (3) the Hawks home support is, at times, tepid.

But linesmakers had enough confidence in them to start them off at 8 points.

GOOD LUCK BETTORS!!!!

I like 'em all except the Bulls. They're dead meat. The Celts and the Cavs saw the Magic eliminate the Bobcats and believe me they are keyed to do the same to the Heat and the Bulls.

The Lakers, I believe, are in serious trouble. Durant today is as offensively proficient as Koby 13 years ago and the Lakers don't have any answer for Westbrook. Furthermore, they are being outhustled and Koby is injured--(probably more than they are telling).

Good-Luck

Can't miss (famous last words). I wish I had bought in at -190 last night because the line sits at -260 at LV Hilton. (see VegasInsider.com)

nil

I like the humor when it breaks out. I like the cool avatars. I like the pick-meisters like Odds-buster and target-9 and Crazy Milk Man and others----in fact I find their stuff right after I post mine.

I like a broad exchange of ideas. Come on with it. I won't bite your head off, if you're wrong.

nil

Before the smell of blood and gunpowder leaves the air, take a whiff and then tell me in a few words,why you come to this forum.

Is it the picks?  Or do you enjoy broader exchange of ideas and concepts.

In either case, if the people post here frequently are nasty, does it make it more likely that you'll post something? In other words, is it a fearsome thing to be wrong?

your thoughts are appreciated and will be responded too as long as I have broadband service today. (Of course, there's nothing wrong you responding to one another.)

NIl

If anyone on this forum risks real money without doing a calculator check, that's their problem. I can be right and I can be wrong. So you are not looking out for anyone. And you don't know whether I'm set in my ways or not. You just want  to do one thing: PROVE YOU ARE RIGHT AND LET EVERYBODY KNOW IT. anonymously, of course, in the ether of cyber space where you can put on your little tin foil hat and your too small t-shirt with the big "S" on it and wave your play sword around.

When you can get to a pleasant exchange of ideas ....ferget it. I don't want communicate with you anymore. period.

Game playing....In the book "Games People Play" this is called NIGYSOB (Now I got you son of a bitch.). You want to challenge my math or understanding, that's one thing. What you need more than to prove me wrong is to find out why you are so unpleasant. What's missing in your life, that you should want to be feared one of the forum.

This is a public forum where people post ANONYMOUSLY and thoughts and ideas come and go. So it is easy to seize on a point and come on with a crushing response. If we were sitting around the "book", you wouldn't dare get in the converstion with the snideness you use anonymously.

As to your math point, you are right the way you discuss it but I don't necessarily agree with your analysis.

It's still a somewhat free country, so respond to this, if you want to. But I will not respond to anything else you post until you get some meds or find some way to settle down.

NIL

Make that money aireent777!!! At least you seem to understand that  teams win and lose, cover and don't cover and that there is a risk in gambling. A certain bob696969 is having trouble handling the news.

GOOD LUCK!!!

NIL

And this snide tone is totally unfriendly and unnecessary. I hope you don't read another thing I write. I KNOW THIS CONCEPT IS SOUND BECAUSE I'VE COLLECTED ON IT 3 TIMES.

NIL

Read Carefully! It is not a 2-teamer any longer. When you put the "over"  "under" tail on it, it becomes a 3 teamer which usually (here) pays 6/1. I've been collecting on this type of bet sense Saturday.

These are bet with the understanding that either the "over" or the "under" is going to lose.

Can the base two teamer lose??? of course....this is betting. So my basic two-teamer is chosen to win. That's why I name specific teams instead of just calling them TEAM A and TEAM B.

If you got two better teams, then use them. The Celts and Mavs are the teams on my bet and I believe they will cover.

NIL

Version One:

Celtics -340 with

Mavs -260 with

Lakers -310 with

Lakers Under

Version two:

Now do everything you just did BUT FLIP the UNDER for OVER.

Bet them both for the same amount of money. Returns about 3/1

Get with it! Make Money!

GOOD LUCK BETTORS!

NIL