Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
wow, really surprised the dolphins have such little heart.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
replied to
Anyone agree with Indy being the sucker bet of the week -3.5 in Cleveland?
in NFL Betting |
NegLineMovement | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta: since when does the "public" bet games on a wednesday? If not "public" betting, it must be "private"? That makes more sense.
|
phixer | 1164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake: Dolphins beat the 9-3 patriots, 8-4 chargers and 7-5 bills at home (all by 10+) and lost to the 9-3 Packers on the last play of the game. Baltimore could definitely win this game, but to think they SHOULD win is unrealistic. Which is exactly why they are dogs. Yes, dolphins play to their competition, with the exception of whipping up on San Diego and basically getting rolled by KC. Throw those two games out and they have held up against the best teams in the NFL. I think Miami wins this one tbh, but I am reluctant to put any money on it. Going to the game actually, so maybe I will haha.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
replied to
Anyone agree with Indy being the sucker bet of the week -3.5 in Cleveland?
in NFL Betting
Do I think Cleveland is a better team? Better defense for sure. Any mistakes are amplified when Luck makes them because their defense is usually atrocious. This and the Balt @ Miami game are both interesting games to me this week.
|
NegLineMovement | 10 |
|
|
created a topic
Anyone agree with Indy being the sucker bet of the week -3.5 in Cleveland?
in NFL Betting
82% on road favorite giving 3.5 points to a hungry qb. Indy not playing in the comfort of the dome..
Sounds too easy. Going to go with Cleveland +3.5 if line stays this way around gametime.
|
NegLineMovement | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mrfixers: BTW phins Motive operadi again in effect WIN in sep oct nov soon as Decmber rolls around loss after loss and wind up out of playoffs
LOOK at years past of Dolphins lat year week 16 and 17 lost both div games @ bills and VS Jets at home 2012 lost two of final 4 games @ 49ers at Pats shut out 28-0 2011 well season was over early 0-7 start 2010 lost final 3 games vs Bills vs lions @ Pats 2009 same thing lost final 3 games @ Titans vs Texans vs steelrs 2006 lost final 3 games 2005 lost it early that yaer 2004 lost it early that yaer also lost 3 out of final 5 games I can go back to 89 with dolphins results in DEC. they alwys lose 3 or more out of final 5 games. BTW dolphins trend vs AFC north 0-7 as a fav. byieeeeeee Phins you will now see a super bowl pro bowl QB smash you at home .
I have to agree somewhat. Baltimore owns the dolphins, no ifs ands or buts. I am still hesitant to bet either team I guess you could say.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374: I don't trust those %'s at all, and to be honest, don't really care what the "public" is on. Just try and pick winners. The reason the Ravens might be getting some love is that the Dolphins looked very underwhelming in a national TV game, and are on a shorter week. This is essentially a playoff game here, loser is going to be in trouble. Miami has been up and down, but they've proven they can win a game like this. This is a coinflip game to me, and I think there have to be better spots. Pretty much what I was thinking. Probably a better play somewhere. Although, I have yet to find this information regarding public betting dogs with such a high percentage on the road. Seems like the most interesting play on the board, from my POV.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
well someone is playing this, it isn't the "private."
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: leans for week 14 bal ml +125 pit ml +140 cle ml +170 kc ml -105 seattle ml -105 hou -5 Phix, approx. 80% of public is on road dog Balt. Seems fishy to me. Are you keeping any stats on this situational type play? I am having trouble researching this.
|
phixer | 1164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LastDrift: It's too early, wait until it's closer to game time. True.. but will most likely only drift by 5-7% (most likely) .. I"ve had problems finding this data though.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
Does anyone know the stats of when the public is 80% more on a dog playing away from home? To me this screams take miami??
Would welcome any input.
|
NegLineMovement | 20 |
|
|
I have turned it back on and all these points were scored.. how did it go down?
|
mikeru3 | 438 |
|
|
gl
|
KingMidasTouch | 19 |
|
|
good win on LAC
|
phixer | 1054 |
|
|
wow only about 115 missed layups in this phoenix game
|
phixer | 1054 |
|
|
GL
|
phixer | 1054 |
|
|
wow, 4 unit play tonight on under.. GL
|
phixer | 2804 |
|
|
I'm going to the game tomorrow, Ill put in a good word for you with Tannehill. Honestly, I like Miami to pull together and win this one. But... GL
|
barronio | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RadarLuv: This game may go under still cuz N.O. is getting conservative and Dallas can't score! cant even get a first down
|
Fademeuwin | 147 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.