Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hurts 0-2 in wild card love 1-0 in wild card
aj brown is badly banged up. I like the packers as dogs today |
OverAmbassador | 2 |
|
|
Buff ml packer ml bucs ml
Good luck |
OverAmbassador | 2 |
|
|
Thanks bud. Already ripped the other 3.
had no idea this Penn state game was on a neutral court. lol the league gets me all the time with these random ass mid season neutral court bullshit. For what reason is this game being played in Pennsylvania and not at Penn State? Lmao I’m so confused here |
OverAmbassador | 3 |
|
|
Penn state -7.5 NW +7 UCF +5 Illinois -7.5
50$
Penn state ml UCF +5 Nw +7 Illinois ML
15$ |
OverAmbassador | 3 |
|
|
Odd thing to me is clearly they made some adjustments on defense which is good. But after scoring 38 points the first game they decide to change the offensive game plan? Makes no sense to me |
OverAmbassador | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Unplug:
I don't get it. What is mentioned above....but why aren't you doubling chase?
they are doubling on some plays. 80% of their plays they have safety help on chase. |
OverAmbassador | 18 |
|
|
Didnt Russel throw for 414 yards against this defense? |
OverAmbassador | 18 |
|
|
Let’s run the ball 30+ times against one of the worst pass defenses in the league?
where do these coaches come up with this sh**?! |
OverAmbassador | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bluejet777:
@OverAmbassador Massive huh?
yeah massive boss!
Moneyline had no chance but 18 was too many!
|
OverAmbassador | 28 |
|
|
Watched this mizzou squad all season.
these boys can hoop and play defense. Already upset #1 Kansas and now we are getting 18? Auburn is good but not untouchable already losing a couple games.
the only team mizzou has played that was ranked going into the game was Kansas whom they upset. Memphis and Illinois are now ranked who was not ranked going into their game with mizzou and mizzou kept it within a few scores. 18 is way too much imo |
OverAmbassador | 28 |
|
|
Missouri ml missouri +18 massive.
good luck |
OverAmbassador | 28 |
|
|
O32.5
-120
texas state vs n Texas |
OverAmbassador | 1 |
|
|
Anyone seen this kid play? Any insight? |
OverAmbassador | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TJZags598:
@OverAmbassador "find me a rookie qb that has been thrown into the role mid season and was successful in the playoff hunt in the last 30 years. You will not find one" Now you are saying first road game. I am not reading between the lines. I just read what you wrote, and responded to what you wrote. I didn't imagine these things. I found more than 1. Then you add qualifiers. you are right, everyone else is wrong. I mean , if i take you literally, mid season would be game # 9, so it would be hard to find a rookie QB put in in game #9 in any season. and then it would have to be a road game.
You names 2 qb’s who played nearly half the season and I will give you Shaun king even though he didn’t beat a single team on the road that year. So… you have 1 qb who fits the criteria in the last 30 years. I like those odds |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
If you honestly think a rookie qb with zero road starts was a better play than veteran Kirk cousins in a MUST WIN GAME you don’t know football @tjzags598 Where are the facts to back up your logical statement of Penix being the better option? His time at Washington? His high school high light tape? His pre season snaps? You are moronic to think a rookie qb can just walk onto a nfl field in his first game on the road and think you have a better chance at winning than with Kirk cousins |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TJZags598:
@OverAmbassador "all of you idiots telling me cousins was not the right choice because of his horrible play please find me a rookie qb that has been thrown into the role mid season and was successful in the playoff hunt in the last 30 years. You will not find one" " Jackson and Yates had 6+ starts under their belt in the regular season" shaun king had 4 and got throttled in his first road start 45-0 lol. ur missing my point. This was a must win game for the falcons and they start a rookie qb who has never started a road game in his life over a seasoned vet cousins You keep changing the narrative to suite your delusion.. You also know %^&* about sports. When a change like this is made, it comes from the LOCKERROOM. Cousins teammates hate him. They love Penix. its that foo kin simple.,
What’s my narrative? Read the entire thread. Ive stated many times in this thread that rookie qbs on their first start on the road are shit. I’ve also stated that not a single rookie qb thrown into a playoff push has succeeded. Tj Yates and lamar Jackson were inserted into their roles at the beginning of the season so they had much time to prepare for playoff caliber football. Shaun king lost 45-0 in his first road start and beat backup cade mcnown in his only road win start that season. you seem to not like to read between the lines which is fine, but you will always be a sheep. |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
294 million dollars |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
I don’t get what’s so hard to grasp about the concept of rookie qb’s being shit on their first road start and the falcons deciding to go through with penix anyway in a must win game!!! |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
@TJZags598 Jackson and Yates had 6+ starts under their belt in the regular season shaun king had 4 and got throttled in his first road start 45-0 lol.
ur missing my point. This was a must win game for the falcons and they start a rookie qb who has never started a road game in his life over a seasoned vet cousins |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:
Cousins is having issues with his Achilles injury. He can't step into throws properly and lost a ton of velocity on his passes...it was really really bad at the start of the season. Hasn't got much better, so they sat him down
if it was injury related then I understand. But it seems like “cousins got benched” rather then he stepped down due to injury |
OverAmbassador | 60 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.