Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Internet gambling bill offered in Washington
Thursday, February 25, 2010 - from the American Horse Council Washington, DC --- Another bill has been introduced in Congress to license and regulate Internet gambling. This bill is in the Senate. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) was passed in 2006. UIGEA does not prohibit Internet wagering; it bars banks and credit card companies from processing payments for such wagering by prohibiting the use of credit in connection with unlawful Internet wagering. The law excludes from the definition of “unlawful Internet wagering” “any activity that is allowed under the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978,” thus protecting racing’s interstate wagering activities by maintaining the status-quo with respect to such activities under the Interstate Horseracing Act. Senate Internet bill introduced Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) introduced the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and Simplification Act of 2010 (S. 3018). Although the bill is principally a tax bill, including provisions to make the federal tax code simpler, fairer and fiscally responsible, it also includes provisions that would permit Internet wagering with federally licensed operators and tax it. Presumably the Internet tax would pay for some of the other tax changes proposed in the bill. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Finance. Basically, the bill is identical to Congressman Barney Frank’s Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act (H.R. 2267). The new Senate bill would not repeal the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. Rather it would create a federal regulatory and enforcement framework under which Internet gambling operators/licensees could obtain federal licenses from the Department of Treasury authorizing them to accept wagers over the Internet from individuals in the U.S. The bill applies to both foreign and domestic operators, including those offering advance deposit wagering on horse racing. The bill defines an Internet gambling facility as one that manages or controls “an Internet site through which bets are initiated, received, or otherwise made, whether by telephone, satellite, or other wire or wireless communication.” Operators would be licensed by the Department of Treasury, which would have authority to adopt regulations; authorize, suspend and terminate licenses; employ agents; and enforce the Act. In order to receive a license, operators, including those offering wagering on horseracing, would have to apply to the Secretary of Treasury and:
A state regulatory authority may certify to the Secretary that applicants for licenses meet the qualifications for licensing. Licenses would be good for five years. To be granted a license, Internet gambling operators would have to have safeguards in place to:
“Opt-out” and other gambling statutes Individual states and Indian tribes would be able to “opt-out” and thus prohibit or limit Internet gambling within their borders by notifying the Secretary that they will limit such bets. Bets could not be taken from any such state or tribal land. Violations would subject operators to loss of license, fines and/or criminal penalties of up to five years. The bill provides that the federal wire statute (18 U.S.C. 1084) would not apply to any wagers with an operator licensed by the Secretary under the Act. Fees and taxes The bill authorizes Treasury to assess “user fees” to administer the act and to meet the expenses of reviewing license applications and administering the Act. The legislation would impose a two percent fee on any company licensed by Treasury to offer Internet wagering. The fee would be paid by the operator every 30 days based on funds deposited with the operator by bettors during that period. The fee could not be paid out of funds deposited by bettors or their winnings. The fees would be paid into the general fund of the Treasury. In order to receive a license, the operator must implement measures to ensure that all taxes applicable to Internet gambling are collected from individual bettors and from the operators and paid to the Treasury. The legislation would impose new record-keeping requirements on operators and require them to disclose the name, address, social security number of any person placing a bet. It would also mandate the disclosure of the bettor’s gross winnings, gross wagers, gross losses and net winnings for the year. Licensee/operators would be required to withhold on the bettor’s winnings. |
Professortrades | 6 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I will take the Colts on the ML -200 I can see Peyton holding the trophy while giving tribute to New Orleans. It will be a touching moment and NO will still be able to celebrate the hometown kid. But I dont see them winning this game. This play has the highest rating I can give a play. Goodluck all! |
Professortrades | 1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by AyalaZero:
ProfessorTrades... Not bashing... but let's try to keep it real next time. P.S. I am typing this on my laptop, while driving home in my '09 Bugatti Veyron. WOW...........unreal' I was driving home from MIami the last two days and DID post my plays on my laptop from the front seat of Cayenne. The fact is I have a life and have nice things Get over it. |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question to all here................ It has got me thinking during this streak.....Here is my question... Guys that come on here (like myself) that have some skill or system or whatever, that post winners and take massive crap from the bashers.....WHY would we want to stay and post here? We dont get paid...we have lives outside of the internet....we have 10% good feedback and 90% bashing...and when you lose you are the enemy. Why would we post? When you get your answer you will know why good guys DO NOT post at places like this. I will stop by from time to time........... It amazes me that someone could take away from all this the crap that people have taken away. The fact is that I came in here to wi a bet.....I WON IT!!!!! The rest was gravy......................I lost about $13000.00 in real money last night. That is a fact...HOWEVER....if I had won I would have been celebrating. 4th down....UGH! The other fact is that I made over $14000 on Saturday and was already up 17000 for the week. I played what I played because it recieved my highest score in the system for ingame plays. I went "all-in" on 4 Aces only tohave been beat by a small straight-flush that was hidden for the most part. You have to jsut tip your hat to the other player and step away from the table with the Paycheck for coming in 2nd that year. It was fun while it lasted guys. |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by SolidCapper:
This guy lost most of his bankroll cause he dabbled on Moneylines under -300. It's so hard to make a long streak if you bet on ML's under -300. I think greediness took over, and it unfortunately backfired. Dude...................ARE YOU SERIOUS? This streak on Covers HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY BANKROLL....................nor does it portray all of the other plays I make. If you look back you will see that on saturday alone I made over $14000. I have the luxury to play wahetever amounts I want to play. Frankly, this sports investing is my MAD money accounts. I actually make a living in the real life. This thread and streak was to win a bet............AND I WON THAT BET and proved that point. This new thread was to see if I could get to 50-0 and I did NOT reach that goal. OH FUCKING WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I will enjoy my holiday next week in the Bahamas and spend my MAD money on the tables and on OceanClub., So take all your crap and shove off dude! BTW.thanks for making my decision that much easier.
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Just was wondering Brother What Online Book let's you Bet 10K+ on in Game Wagering ???
I am not sure what you mean by this question. I play with Greek and I play on a private account with Cris. I have layed THOUSANDS on ingames. Here are the ones that I put thru Greek last night unfortunately.
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Was fun while it lasted gents. I capped that ingame correctly but was taken back a little bythe last 4 minutes. I was driving home and FIRING off plays from the laptop....LOL Oh well. I apologize to anyone that might have tailed me on that ingame play. I apologize for Belichecks call on 4th down. I simply apologize for the entire game....... Note to self......Dont stop and have dinner with wine and then drive while firing off plays on the laptop....LMBO Anyways....................I am not sure what to do at this juncture....?? If I start another streak I will get haters....If I call it a day I will get haters......Hmmmmmmmmmmmm I think I might think about starting a thread to show that you can lose a ML and still make money. That is the big criticism I here the most. |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well the run ended just like that. I enjoyed the ride gents. I will be here to take all the bashing like a man!!!!! I am home now and turning in for the night but will be glad to answer tomorrow. Wow......what a play call on 4th down......LOL |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding ................. NE -800 40 to win 5 |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wheres my boys...............
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding NE again -360 52 to win 20 |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding...........NE ingame ml -340 34 to win 10 |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding............ patriots ingame ml -260 52 units to win 20 |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you held a gun to my head I would pick Indy straight up DISCLAIMER...................
LOL........this is JUST an opinion and NOT to be counted towards my streak |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33-0 +186
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Just having a little fun |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Will be traveling today again....I will try to fire up the laptop from time to time.....Just having some fun in this GORGEOUS weather
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding.......... Minny ML -1350 27 units to win 2 |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Update Record at Covers.......... 32-0 + 184 units
|
Professortrades | 101 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by SuckerBet77:
Well actually, he's up over 100 units so it would actually take about 3 or 4 losses for all of the profits to go poof. Everybody on this site would jerk off if they were up 100 units and, yet, half of the people posting here keep pointing out that this system won't work. Betting spreads doesn't work either if you don't hit your target win %, so what is the difference? I stopped in your state to have brunch this morning SB. Thanks for all the support.....Lets go for 50-0 and 300 units. |
Professortrades | 101 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.