Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITALY also to win Outrights odds @7 / +600) For the final ITALY 2.69 xG vs 0.79 xG England, Italy deserve to win the final Forza ITalia https://www.infogol.net/en/matches/results/yesterday
Note: I think that without penalties shoot against italy, spain is the best on xG but it is knock out tornament so |
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
replied to
Does it exist " Expected points" stats for NBA like it exist "Expected Goals" stats for Soccer ?
in NBA Betting @Enzyme13 I think it is like "expected goals" in soccer but still keep in secret by bookmakers for nba (basketball) These stats are not displaying for the public until now I don't know why it is releases for soccer it strange because it help bettors against bookies.. |
schmeto | 5 |
|
|
created a topic
Does it exist " Expected points" stats for NBA like it exist "Expected Goals" stats for Soccer ?
in NBA Betting |
schmeto | 5 |
|
|
Here is the xG to see the potential Defensive of teams
1) Italy : -3.17 xG below the average level of Defense 2) England: -1.83 xG below the average level of Defense 3) Netherlands : -1.7 xG below the average level of Defense 4) Germany : -1.47 xG below the average level of Defense 5) Austria : -1.1 xG below the average level of Defense 6) Spain: -1.07 xG below the average level of Defense 7) Belgium: -1 xG below the average level of Defense 8) Switzerland : -0.7 xG below the average level of Defense 9) France: -0.6 xG below the average level of Defense 10) Denmark : -0.47 xG below the average level of Defense 11) Ukraine : -0.43 xG below the average level of Defense 12) Sweden: +0.37 xG above the average level of Defense 13) Portugal: +0.5 xG above the average level of Defense 14) Rep Czech: +0.63 xG above the average level of Defense 15) Croatia: +0.7 xG above the average level of Defense 16) Wales : +1.33 xG above the average level of Defense
Italy seems to have the best potential defense and Wales are the worst on this sector Regarding OFFENSE+DEFENSE xG may be I should consider ITALY also to win Outrights odds @7 / +600) Netherlands and Spain seems teams to have the most potential balanced off+def Wait and see... |
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
Here is the update of xG after the last group games played
1) Spain: +3.67 xG above the average level ( odds @ 8.71 / +771) 2) Netherlands : +2.43 xG above the average level ( odds @9.92 / +892) 3) Denmark : +2.33 xG above the average level ( odds@ 19.34 / +1834) 4) Portugal : +1.97 xG above the average level ( odds @ 11.67 / +1067)
Others team's trends (For info): Italy: +0.43 xG Wales : +0.33xG Switzerland : -0.17 xG Belgium +0.2 xG Austria: -0.83 xG Ukraine: -0.97xG England: -0.13 xG Croatia: -0.8 xG Czech Republic: -0.2xG Sweden: -0.13xG France: -0.27 xG Germany : +0.33xG
I don't know if it makes sens but I will try to make to see xG bests potential defenses now |
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
Now with the xG.. Who is surprised of the score of Spain against Slov? For European Big , this website is very good for xG, there is historical last years xG results https://understat.com/
|
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
I love the IDEA of XG, but I have yet to find a practical implementation of it in my handicapping. A couple of reasons.... 1. XG itself - the measurement that feeds the stat - is an inexact science. It is largely determined from location on the pitch where the attempt at goal was made, but only secondarily takes in to effect all of the other determining factors like positioning of defense, situation, is this a primary of secondary chance at goal etc. 2. It is skewed by PKs and free kicks 3. The two above are on the collection of the stat itself (which is flawed and inexact), but this is based on the application of the stat. If a side has a high XG, but is scoring below that XG value - is that a sign that a team should be sided with in an individual match? In other words, Spain is second in the tournament in XG (2.4 above average), but have only scored 1 goal. What does that mean practically to me? It could mean that Spain just hasn't hit their chances but are "due" to make more goals because they consistently get chances, OR it can mean that Spain is just horrible at converting chances and shouldn't be bet. That being said.... I look at XG. It is part of my process and important to see between the lines. But I am not totally convinced that a flawed statistic that is more art than science can be applied accurately to be a predictor of future events. I think it is one ingredient in a complicated soup - but just my opinion. Thoughts? It is the problem with stats numbers usually , we can read it on differents way... where do you find the 2.4 xG above the average for spain? because it is the same result of my calculs so if the work is already done in other website I would like to have it if possible. I have seen videos on youtubes that xG are balanced on long term so we can expect + for the retarding xG I guess even it is not exact science( look scotland I had for them +1.03 xG above the average AND they finished last... but here it is not long term view on 1-2-3games... What we could say also about teams who are qualified for next round and have a negative xG( below the average level) ... That could mean these teams are talented more than the average and/or they had "more luck" for the moment Where is the Truth...? that is good question may be without reply :)
For me xGD( differential xG) is a "joke", it is more complex that that on my mind to forecast next.
|
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
I heard already few time before about xG but I just start to interest much more with the euro2020 You can use infogol.net for the euro https://www.infogol.net/en/leagues/european-championship-finals-group-stage-2021/231 or FootballxG.com for world games data and forecast
I have checked group stage for euro2020 about expected goals and analyse deeply this I am beginning with that so it is a test but I already find one idea to find some potential of teams. We will see how it is work... It stays tonight games for the last qualification places so I will update these datas after games of groupeE+F will be finished..
Here is teams that I believe they have the potential to make upset and win outrights the Euro2020.
1) Netherlands : +2.43 xG above the average level ( odds @12.58 / +1158) 2) Spain: +2.4 xG above the average level ( odds @ 10.54 / +954) 3) Denmark : +2.33 xG above the average level ( odds@ 22.33 / +2133) 4) Portugal : +1.43 xG above the average level ( odds @ 11.25 / +1025)
Others team's trends (For info): Italy: +0.43 xG Wales : +0.33xG Switzerland : -0.17 xG Belgium +0.2 xG Finland: -1.73 xG Austria: -0.83 xG Ukraine: -0.97xG England: -0.13 xG Croatia: -0.8 xG Czech Republic: -0.2xG Sweden: -0.13xG Slovakia:-2.07xG Poland: -0.3xG France: -0.43 xG Germany : +0.33xG Hungary: -1.23 xG Note: Finland, Slovakia, Hungary, Ukraine are the worst on this ( and bookies agree with that on their standing outrights winner)
BL |
schmeto | 8 |
|
|
FRZA ! |
specimen24 | 47 |
|
|
Thanks for the Write up BL |
vanzack | 218 |
|
|
Nice write up! BL |
DiamondJack | 328 |
|
|
Results DENVER ML ( s1+s2+s3) +1.69U PHOENIX ML (s1+s2+s3) +1.28U Profit of the day: + 2.97U
Total record of the System1(S1) since beginning of play-in(47bets) : +9.5U ( Roi :+20.23%) (If I had followed bookies trends I will be in lost by -13.08U) For info: System2(S2) has a total playinoff record: +8.08U System3(S3) has a total playinoff record: +4.3U
For Today: CLIP@DAL : system1 has no value(for the moment), S2 gives value on DALLAS ML, S3 gives value on CLIP ML I don't like so much contrary trends between systems In add, I am more waiting that Home teams winning in nearby future I will wait to see if a value will come for S1. It will be DALLAS ML or ( FOLD)
BL |
schmeto | 14 |
|
|
Results PHILA ML ( System1+S2+S3) +0.41U NY ML ( S1+S3) -1U MEMPHIS ML ( S1+S2+S3) -1U DALLAS ML ( S1+S2+S3) +2.7U
Profit of the day: +1.1U
Total record of the System1(S1) since beginning of play-in(45bets) : +6.53U ( Roi :+14.5%) (If I had followed bookies trends I will be in lost by -11.08U) For info: System2(S2) has a total playinoff record: +5.08U System3(S3) has a total playinoff record: +1.33U
For Today DENVER ML ( s1+s2+s3) PHOENIX ML (s1+s2+s3)
BL |
schmeto | 14 |
|
|
Results Brooklyn ML +0.1U Denver ML +0.79U Phoenix ML +0.54U Profit of the day: +1.43U
Total record of the System1(S1) since beginning of play-in(41bets) : +5.42U ( Roi :+13.22%) (If I had followed bookies trends I will be in lost by -10.23U) For info: System2(S2) has a total record: +2.76U System3(S3) has a total record: +0.22U
Bets for Today: PHILA ML ( System1+S2+S3) NY ML ( S1+S3) MEMPHIS ML ( S1+S2+S3) DALLAS ML ( S1+S2+S3)
BL |
schmeto | 14 |
|
|
I am on Denver ML too
BL |
IntuitionBets | 610 |
|
|
Results Washington ML +3U Memphis ML -1U Profit of the day : +2U
Total record of the system since beginning of play-in(38bets) : +4U ( Roi :+10.5%) (If I had followed bookies trends I will be in lost by -7.23U)
For Today: My system1 gives me Brooklyn ml, Denver ml and phoenix ml but for Brooklyn and Phoenix the value is very low(not interesting). In add system2&3 are not agree with the system1 so I will fold them.(I will count it on the system record anyway) So, It stays Denver ML that respect the 3system's trends...
BL |
schmeto | 14 |
|
|
Results: Atlanta ML ( game4) +0.5U Phoenix ML ( game4) +2.32U Boston ML (game4) -1U Dallas ML (game4) - 1U Profit day: +0.82U Total record of the system since beginning of play-in(36bets) : +2U ( Roi :+5.5%) (If I had followed bookies trends I will be in lost by -6.67U)
For today: Washington ML Memphis ML
BL |
schmeto | 14 |
|
|
@Anonyme I think there are many things together LEbron and Lakers had little rest between last season and this new season + Lebron was injuried ( and AD too) during this regular season and I think it happened because Lebron and AD had not enough rest so injuries come more quickly +Lebron has 1 year more also Regarding my system lakers could be out at round1 but not sure it will happen, it is just trends probabilities I was wondering witch team could beat Brooklyn @ Brooklyn, the only one I thought was The lakers(with Lebron) but now....I don't think anymore
|
calicappin | 22 |
|
|
Lebron looked "Tired"... |
calicappin | 22 |
|
|
Lebron looks " Tired"... |
begginerboy | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.