Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tampa and Balt (#918) Under 8.5 (-115)
|
seafood_pasta | 1 |
|
|
Back tested a systems total I created. Background story, I was falling asleep on the couch watching the local news when the sportscaster started talking about why Golden State would go over the total in the next game, and it clicked in my mind to look for situations that this sportscaster was referring to. My back testing went all the way to 1996. Don't want to make a big deal yet, but the results are "sick."
$500 Washington / Colorado (#959) Over 10.5 [-105] Friends and haters are all welcomed. The stock market would not be a true efficient market if everyone was betting on stocks to go up....or go down. All comments welcomed. Seafood-Pasta
|
seafood_pasta | 1 |
|
|
Quit posting commentary and just post games.
|
WSTgekko | 870 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WSTgekko: *UPDATED* YTD: 32-48 Win/Loss: -7357 Stay positive
|
WSTgekko | 870 |
|
|
Game of the Week on [507] Utah +5.5
O/U Best Bets on: [969/70] LA/Kansas City Over 9 (-110) [503/04] Milw/Toronto Over 199 [505/06] SA/Memphis Over 190 Lock of the Year on [970] Kansas City +100 Total of the Year on [79/80] Boston/Ottawa Under 5 (-150) |
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
-1.10 units YTD
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
Best bet on the CIN Reds
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
Game of the year on Pittsburgh hockey
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
Lock of the year on MLB Colorado
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
I will be documenting my journey. There will be highs and lows.
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
Get on the there train! Money
|
seafood_pasta | 1 |
|
|
whole account split up on these two
northwestern -2.5 davidson -2.5 (-115) let's win 2
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
Double,
I got your text message. I agree 100% brah! Keep banging!
|
DoubleUp4Life | 33 |
|
|
I selected:
Drake Over BYU Over Virginia Under UC Irvine Over but the team experts consensus are on the opposite. Fade me and follow the team experts.... Okay make money
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
created a topic
Fade my analysis of the consensus totals *Please read* You profit*
in College Basketball
I take the entire team consensus list for "team experts."
I pick, before looking, at what I think the team experts consensus will be. If I pick Over, and the consensus is Under, then you would want to fade me and the Under. I back tested since Feb 1 and my picks (when opposite) are well below 45%. You profit I profit because I fade my pick We all make money
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
I cannot post names because it is against Covers rules, but I will say there are some awful touts on New England. I am talking terrible scam artists....but we all know that dogs with fleas sometimes lose the fleas for a short period of time.
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
The consensus at Covers at 12:15 PM today is 869-837 Atl and 957-562 Over. Tout tally is 37-35 N Eng and 14-10 Under. Grand total tally: 904 Atlanta 874 New England 967 Over 576 Under
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
Tonight was Denver Greg's first pick as the #1 contestant. Unfortunately I just noticed this. If he wins, wait for a new #1. If he loses, then follow the next #1's first pick only. Repeat.
|
seafood_pasta | 46 |
|
|
Have not had time to research this but this falls under a psychological factor potentially if there was one. Look at the last page of the Monthly Leaderboard and look for brand new contestants with very long names. The psychology angle would be that they do not plan to have that new account long due to the long name. Fade them 1 time, look for a new one tomorrow.
|
seafood_pasta | 3 |
|
|
I have done this in the past but have not had time because of other obligations. This actually made good money. Go to page 3 or 4 of the main Streak leaderboard (not the month board) and randomly find a contestant who has a winning overall record. Follow them until they lose. After they lose, do it all over again.
|
seafood_pasta | 1 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.