Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Taking off. I won't be around to answer any queries.
Best of luck.
|
SmackTheBook | 4 |
|
|
I'm going to give you final scores as I see them
Spurs 102 Warriors 98
Heat 104 76ers 107
|
SmackTheBook | 4 |
|
|
Going to make this short, as I talked about using some type of math formula for making plays (instead of going with your gut, etc...) - I've bet over 160 NBA plays this year, hitting 107 (65%) Winners. I'm going to post for the next 7 days (through next Friday 1/26) to prove my point. Went 2-1 last night. I expect to go 2-0 today. Playing the Hawks -2 ... Bulls went all out against the Warriors. Gotta love them for that (they covered and made me money the other night). However, they destroyed their balance - at least for today - in doing so. Hawks will cover the 2. Raptors +3.5... Tight match-up here. From a pure math standpoint this close game will come down to 2 points either way. I like to bet dogs, but only if I think they will get the W. I think the Raptors get the W tonight - not playing a ML - Am taking the 3.5. Finally for all of you greedy bettors that need more.... If I "was" betting a 3rd game today (I'm not) I would take a close look at the Grizzlies. I looked at it from many different math angles, couldn't find any that added up to a 10 point victory for the Pelicans. But again, when I play a dog, I like to believe they WILL win. I didn't see Memphis winning (they could). But I did see the final score falling somewhere between the 9 points (5 - 7 point range). The first 2 will count on my record. Best of luck.
|
SmackTheBook | 2 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Well, shoot. 2 for 3 - profitable night. Misread the Nuggets game, different scenario than the other two games, so it happens. I'll post for the next 7 days 1-2 plays/daily so anyone who's interested can see the results and how profitable using a math structure to work with can be. Thanks for your comments. GN |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by TheSquare:
You really think that math is the COMPLETE solution to sports betting? Get in line. There are plenty of math PhD's that have tried to analyze sports betting from a pure mathematical perspective, looked at past AND current data and ALL have FAILED. What they fail to realize is that there is the "human aspect" to this field which there is no current mathematical formula for. In my honest opinion for sports betting, the two fields of academia that would constitute a good sports bettor is of course, an understanding mathematics (namely statistics) AND psychology. Mathematics to crunch the numbers along with psychology to understand what the public is thinking, why the line was set at a specific number and so on.. You're right about human emotion (and energy expendature). However, this can be factored into the formula. In fact, it was a big part of the Heat/Nets outcome tonight. Thanks for the comment |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
anyone who comes in here and just says "math" is the way to success is gonna get bashed and run the hell outta here.thats like me going on to a cooking show with the pros and just saying "food" is what I'm gonna make for the judges. Thanks for the comment. I haven't watched a game all year. My wife got rid of DirecTV b/c I stopped watching NFL games. I check scores on my phone only. If I get bashed for winning this way, I think I'll be all right.
|
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by spotslife1:
nice NBA and NFL I take
NBA only. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by spotslife1:
so are you up or down...
I have bet a total of 162 games (Sides, Totals, FHs) so far. My record is 105-57 |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by spotslife1:
and your posting stats are?+ or -
I haven't posted NBA plays this year. My plays have nothing to do with the theme of this post. The 3 plays I have posted in this thread are examples of pure math at work. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by TsikenBreast:
Numbers/math do not lie, as books also use the same basis.but you are delusional if you think your mathematical system is better than what they have. I did not say I get every game correct. I said if you don't use specific math, you will lose more than you win. Fact: The books know who is going to win and by how much in almost EVERY instance. Not talking about your local guy, but the men who set lines.
|
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by fugetboutit:
QUOTE Originally Posted by SmackTheBook: QUOTE Originally Posted by fugetboutit: Tel us your mathematical formula genius. lol .Play situations not teams Sorry Pal. Can't help you with that. You are just another bullshit artist trying to act smarter than everyone FOH loser I guess we'll know later this evening. Best of luck to you. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by dreski89:
QUOTE Originally Posted by SmackTheBook: Gut instinct. Choosing bets on who's been playing well, or poorly, will always leave you behind the curve. Math is real. Numbers do not lie. Not season long averages. Not PPG BS. True Math. Tonight... Brooklyn wins by a handful. Denver covers The Grizzlies cover as well. Have a nice night. why does BKN win by a handful if miami has been beating everybody on the road if ur not using any system>>???
I just said true math does not lie. I don't use a system. True math allows you to see what is going to develop. It anticipates change. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
replied to
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by fugetboutit:
Tel us your mathematical formula genius. lol .Play situations not teams
Sorry Pal. Can't help you with that. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
created a topic
If You're Not Using Some Type Of Mathematical Formula When Deciding Who To Bet ...
in NBA Betting Gut instinct. Choosing bets on who's been playing well, or poorly, will always leave you behind the curve. Math is real. Numbers do not lie. Not season long averages. Not PPG BS. True Math.
Tonight... Brooklyn wins by a handful. Denver covers The Grizzlies cover as well.
Have a nice night. |
SmackTheBook | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dolphins4life1: And I don't only play big favs, I play a good mix of both. Get your dumb*ss information out of here. Brother, you are one lame MF. That's a fact. Can't take my original comment and respond intelligently without name calling. Guilty people feel like they're being attacked. That's you. One lame Guy who wins 51% of his games... Best of luck. No, not really. In truth, you're winning percentage will probably get worse...
|
dolphins4life1 | 42 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Dnguyen7695: P*ssy is probably mad cause he's a donkey or since his a$$ just joined recently, he caught Phins on an off night and lost money. Whoever the hell he is, keep losing money chump. The level of intelligence in this thread is overwhelming... I don't bet the sides PHINS bets. If I did I'd be DOWN considerably for the year. Any fool can see that by his record and the teams he bets. Oh Wait, I guess you couldn't... so hope this helps: When you bet mostly favs you lose 49% of your games you are losing lots of money... |
dolphins4life1 | 42 |
|
|
If you want to cry when you get caught lying that's up to you. As I said, I don't care. If your followers want to cry when somebody points out a fact - Again, I don't care.
Bottom line is this - if you post, be honest all the time. Even if you're losing... |
dolphins4life1 | 42 |
|
|
Not that I care (because I don't) but in the interest of honesty to players who actually follow you... it looks like your record is incorrect. You seem to have several more wins than you've actually won over the past 2 days PHINS.
If you're going to post, might as well be honest. |
dolphins4life1 | 42 |
|
|
Yesterday: 0-2 -$200 YTD: 19-17 +$290 Todays Plays Athletics -110 (2u) BOL
|
SmackTheBook | 1 |
|
|
Yesterday: 1-2 -$60 YTD: 19-16 +$490 Todays Plays White Sox + 190 Royals even BOL
|
SmackTheBook | 1 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.