Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tied game but why are they keeping Darvish in :(
|
aaironworks | 10 |
|
|
Which side are you guys on? Cardinals offense has been miserable the last few games. But Darvish is usually an auto-fade lately.
Darvish has been very much out the strike zone lately, but if Cards are over-aggressive like last game, it might work in his favor.
|
YoungStunna | 1 |
|
|
YTD 0-0 posted Cards ML -105 Will post the others later |
YoungStunna | 1 |
|
|
Any reason everyone is one Cardinals here? Most their best hitters are resting (Martinez, Goldy, couple others). Nats have the pitching advantage. I know Nats dont have the greatest lineup either, but definitely feel they have a big pitching edge. Plus Nats avoiding sweep. Just curious what yall think |
YoungStunna | 1 |
|
|
Bauer > Alcantra (by a lot)
Indians hitting > Marlins Hitting Indians Bullpen > Marlens Bullpen Not to mention the Marlins only have 8 wins this season. Any reason not to take Indians -1? My main concern is that over 80% of bets are on them, so I feel it may be a trap |
YoungStunna | 7 |
|
|
So I generally bet with my bookie friend, but would prefer a website. Problem is most of them ask for Social security, License, etc. Is there one that asks for less information but still trusted?
Fanduel is good but it's 21+
|
YoungStunna | 7 |
|
|
I know this might be an amateaur question. I know a lot of smaller competitions teams like Man City/Man U might not go 100% and use their best lineup. Is that the case in the FA Cup? Or is it important enough that even those large clubs go all out. Once again I know this might be a bad question haha, so sorry about that |
YoungStunna | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DoctorSuccess:
It was a decent bet at -5. 6 will probably still cover. I have them winning by 9 points. Feel like they easily cover and win by 10+, or lose outright |
YoungStunna | 4 |
|
|
Pacers have been unreal at Home. Hornets have been atrocious on the Road. Feels so easy to go big on Pacers but feel like it's a trap.
Yet this also feels like a game you take Hornets +6 to try and be sharp, and then Pacers win by 15+ and you realized you overthinked it. What do you guys think?
|
YoungStunna | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit: FWIW......I heard Gurley & CJA will split time today I know, and it's very public that CJ Anderson has been the one getting the touches lately. Which is why it makes 13.5 a fishy number. ALSO Gurley is -200 to get more rush attempts than CJ....plus this seems like a more similar game vs Cowboys where had 16 rushes. More run focused instead of heaving the pass game while down 2 TDs |
YoungStunna | 12 |
|
|
My favorite is Margin of Victory Under 7.5 points (-110)
Issue is I can't find it in my books, let me know if you guys know where I can find that. Gurly rushes over 13.5 (The under seems like a trap, expecting a big game out of him today.) Rams 4th down conversion -150 (Very aggressive team with dominant O-line/CJ Anderson. Should be a 4th & 1 or 4th & 2 situaton that they go for. WORST case if not, can always get bailed out if they are losing end game and are in 4 down territory. Any other ones you guys like a lot?
|
YoungStunna | 12 |
|
|
Just had a horrible push with Rockets -2, now Jazz up 21 to start 4th, and only win by 3. What the fuck is going on today |
YoungStunna | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers: Lol what? Have you not sold points before? Not that complicated Maybe you meant +170...thats what you surely meant right? Ah yeah I meant +170. My mistake for the hostility
|
YoungStunna | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers: +3.5 was -110, so -2 @ -170 is pretty normal for a 5.5 swing Are you sure about that? Look at bet365 and alternative spreads. Why would i lie lol, you've been on this site with 12 years and still dont know how selling points work
|
YoungStunna | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers: Weird stuff on planet airbets Lol what? Have you not sold points before? Not that complicated
|
YoungStunna | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Slappers: how in the world did you get rockets -2 @-170 lmao. +3.5 was -110, so -2 @ -170 is pretty normal for a 5.5 swing |
YoungStunna | 18 |
|
|
I took Rockets -2 @ -170. Rockets held lead the entire game. Up 15 in 4th, up 9 with 50 seconds left, and they only win by 2 for the push. What the fuck
|
YoungStunna | 18 |
|
|
Lol a lot of you are embarrassing. Imagine having to name call and go all caps to try and prove a point. Get a life
|
YoungStunna | 126 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hennessy:
you guys just gotta be on the right side of the fix thats all !!!pick the right side !! Yep. Pretty much |
YoungStunna | 126 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:
I had both winners today but both of these games were dirty and were influenced by either ref calls or ref non calls...end of story. I really want to dig into one know it all bitch on this thread but I will let it be...at least for now. Yeah like I'm more annoyed at how dumb people are that they cant acknowledge what happening right in front of them, then I am mad about the result. People really slow nowadays lol |
YoungStunna | 126 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.