Easter Sunday footy

Neither means to me u KNOW winning the lotto is PURE 100% LUCK.

The only stats i did was 1st year at uni.

Yes i understand confidence intervals, Z scores, t scores, mean, standard deviations. All the basics of stats.

None of it helped me win the lotto.

Oh sorry, i watched the news the other night and someone won $50 mill in the states from the lotto, when interviewed, the person said,

"Hirshfelder made me realise that winning the lotto isnt luck, there is skill involved in this, just let Hirshfelder give you a lesson in statistics and you will win like me"...

U fool

Oops, didnt come out properly.

7347 NRL R7 Parr-GCst TSOvUn Under 40.5 Points Includes Extra Time Sell Bet Win 1.9 $850 $1615

I find that they normally put a comma in between the thousand and the next hundred  

Do u want me to give you my account number to have a look?

I only cut and pasted the main description, i cant add the colums where the figures are. I tried to and look what happened in the previous post..........

So i entered them myself.....FFS

Rostos, calm down. I couldn't give a fuck what you bet

Guys, if u want a bet, unload everything u have on the Mumbai Indians to win the IPL.

Seriously, that team is indestructible.

That team is the strongest cricket team ever assembled. It probably is the strongest sporting team ever damn assembled.

They have played about 6 - 7 games, lost one and all the other games, they havent even been tested.

There batsman just dont fail, there bowlers als o just dont fail

"My point is, in order to show that something is a psychological effect, you need to show that it is a psychological effect-not merely that it isn't something else. Which people still don't get. They look at things as logically as they can, and, not seeing any other difference between A and B conclude that the difference between them is psychology.

"We don't understand why the Red Sox played better without Nomar than with him, so we credit it to clubhouse psychology. We don't understand why Joe Torre is successful, so we claim that he is a master psychologist. This is illogical, and it isn't really any different than attributing it to witchcraft. People used 'witchcraft' to explain why babies died in their cribs and why cats act weird. Using 'psychology' in the same way isn't any better, and it isn't a service to real psychology. It is actually defending real psychology to resist the bastardization of the term."

Bill James