All Forums | Rugby

EASY MONEY ON RWC

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1378
Posts: 36
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 1097
Posted: #26
Have to agree.. US for me as well
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #27
Might wanna revise that bet HoH 

I jumped on the +62 once i saw australia's AMAZING performance against ireland 

looks like  for me right now but you never know. I'm just so happy such a major bet and thread is working out 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #28
FUCK, USA COME ONNNNNNNN
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by SAyR:

FUCK, USA COME ONNNNNNNN



 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by SAyR:

Might wanna revise that bet HoH 

I jumped on the +62 once i saw australia's AMAZING performance against ireland 

looks like  for me right now but you never know. I'm just so happy such a major bet and thread is working out 


SAyR, I hope for your sake you were on 62.5, not 62.

If the Aussies didn't suffer a rash of injuries (FIRE DEANS IMMEDIATELY!!!) or miss one more conversion.....................well, you get the point.

Your rationale for backing the Americans here (U.S. sunk a lot of money into rugby (no, we haven't) and the Aussies were shit against Ireland (different match, different day, different head games) was faulty.  The Americans trotted out a rec team who just happened to be smiling and wearing the national colors.  They were not fit for 80 mins of test play and the U.S. kicker (Malifa) was the same guy that was ATROCIOUS against Canada and Japan in the warm-ups.  Of course, he missed his conversion attempt in this match as well.

I hope you got the hook on the 62 here to have made this worthwhile.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #31
I was on 62.5, but my rationale for the bet was NOT that usa has put money into rugby. I was saying that they look good, in terms of formations, discipline etc because of it! I saw 3 man overlaps against Japan and Namibia, but 1 is the most against USA even against Australia. I agree that they were not fit for test play but the reserves of the AUS game were actually all from the starting 1st XV which is why i was tempted by the +62.5, in the end they gave up which is something I thought they were strong enough to avoid at least until much later.

Also, I think I mentioned that Australia had several injured and Genia as captain could pose risks.

But anyway, it worked out for me....just. so i'm pretty happy about that 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #32
Sorry, what I meant to say is that,  I agree that they were not fit for test play but the reserves of the USA against AUS were actually all from the starting 1st XV which played against Ireland and Russia which is why i was tempted by the +62.5, in the end they gave up which is something I thought they were strong enough to avoid at least until much later.

Hopefully makes a little more sense now
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #33
The reserves of the US in that match were all the starters and O'Sullivan wasn't going to give them a run-out because he is saving them for Italy.

The difference between the US starting XV and the reserves is similar to Collingwood and Gold Coast.  The drop-off in talent is eye-popping.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #34
Sorry, don't follow AFL. Still, the 2nd XV gave Australia a run for their money in the first 25minutes! 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by SAyR:

Sorry, don't follow AFL. Still, the 2nd XV gave Australia a run for their money in the first 25minutes! 




That's to be expected SAyR!!!  The first quarter of the match will be scrappy and generally even as both sides figure each other out and fitness levels are high.

Watch some more test-level union and this becomes obvious.  Please be careful on betting too much!
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #36
It was 30 bucks, which is a lot for me but nothing in the real scheme of things 

In hindsight i should have bet on the 1st half margin, which was at around +28ish but i forget. It's a lot better option for the lower tier countries up against the top ones in relation to fitness especially.
All Forums | Rugby
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.