"When a referee makes a mistake you call fix. Referees are human, they make mistakes (apparently you don't).They are incompetent fools, are regimented that way by Harrigan. They are useless, not corrupt. "
is this a HUMAN NATURE CALL OR AN EXAMPLE OF BLATANT CHEATING TO FILL YOUR POCKETS?
Keep prostituting yourself mate, keep doing it...as long as you keep trying to convince yourself and others into believing that the NRL is corrupt free , so people continue to bet, then keep doing it.........
NAME ME ONE REASONABLE AND PLAUSABLE EXPLANATION AS TO WHY A REFEREE WHO HAS REFEREED MORE THAN 20 YEARS, HAS UNLIMITED REPLAYS, DIFFERENT ANGLES AND SLOW MOTION AFTER SLOW MOTION CAME UP WITH THE DECISION HE MADE...
JUST GIVE ME ONE......
JUST ONE......JUST ONE.....JUST ONE.
UNLIMITED REPLAYS, UNLIMITED ANGLES, SLOW MOTION.......GIVE ME ONE REASON....
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
"When a referee makes a mistake you call fix. Referees are human, they make mistakes (apparently you don't).They are incompetent fools, are regimented that way by Harrigan. They are useless, not corrupt. "
is this a HUMAN NATURE CALL OR AN EXAMPLE OF BLATANT CHEATING TO FILL YOUR POCKETS?
Keep prostituting yourself mate, keep doing it...as long as you keep trying to convince yourself and others into believing that the NRL is corrupt free , so people continue to bet, then keep doing it.........
NAME ME ONE REASONABLE AND PLAUSABLE EXPLANATION AS TO WHY A REFEREE WHO HAS REFEREED MORE THAN 20 YEARS, HAS UNLIMITED REPLAYS, DIFFERENT ANGLES AND SLOW MOTION AFTER SLOW MOTION CAME UP WITH THE DECISION HE MADE...
JUST GIVE ME ONE......
JUST ONE......JUST ONE.....JUST ONE.
UNLIMITED REPLAYS, UNLIMITED ANGLES, SLOW MOTION.......GIVE ME ONE REASON....
I don't really know... it's one incident. If they had a bet on the game they would have found
A) Large betting influxes on the Saints
B) another way to make the saints win.
How are you going to detect a bet on a game on more liquid markets like h2h and lines?
if a ref placed a $1k or even $2 bet on a head to head or line, how will they get caight when people are regularly placing $10,15 and even sometimes $20k bets on games?
You cant equivocate the Tandy incident to other incidents...The Tandy incident involved placing a large bet on a very very illiquid market, and it stood out compared to other bets...
We see $5k, $10k and even $20k bets on head to head and lines, but it would be weird to see that on a 1st scoring play
0
Quote Originally Posted by UnderandOver:
I don't really know... it's one incident. If they had a bet on the game they would have found
A) Large betting influxes on the Saints
B) another way to make the saints win.
How are you going to detect a bet on a game on more liquid markets like h2h and lines?
if a ref placed a $1k or even $2 bet on a head to head or line, how will they get caight when people are regularly placing $10,15 and even sometimes $20k bets on games?
You cant equivocate the Tandy incident to other incidents...The Tandy incident involved placing a large bet on a very very illiquid market, and it stood out compared to other bets...
We see $5k, $10k and even $20k bets on head to head and lines, but it would be weird to see that on a 1st scoring play
For this corruption to happen safely, without refs getting their heads chopped off, you'd need all 3 refs on the same page... but the other day you were saying the onfield refs backed one team, and the video ref backed the other..
So which is it?
0
For this corruption to happen safely, without refs getting their heads chopped off, you'd need all 3 refs on the same page... but the other day you were saying the onfield refs backed one team, and the video ref backed the other..
For this corruption to happen safely, without refs getting their heads chopped off, you'd need all 3 refs on the same page... but the other day you were saying the onfield refs backed one team, and the video ref backed the other..
So which is it?
If i ref places a bet on a game, even if all 3 do it...IT DOES NOT MEAN that the bet will win 100% guaranteed......
All what they do is tilt the odds in their favour.......If someone scores a match winning try and the pass goes 3 metres back, THEY CANNOT CALL IT FORWARD to save there bet....
if a kick goes between the sticks, they cant say no goal...
all what they do is get the 50.50 calls to favour them, tilt the odds on their side...Thats how you do it....
Like yesterday, if a team gets a 10-2 penalty count, the CHANCES are they are going to win....Thats all
0
Quote Originally Posted by UnderandOver:
For this corruption to happen safely, without refs getting their heads chopped off, you'd need all 3 refs on the same page... but the other day you were saying the onfield refs backed one team, and the video ref backed the other..
So which is it?
If i ref places a bet on a game, even if all 3 do it...IT DOES NOT MEAN that the bet will win 100% guaranteed......
All what they do is tilt the odds in their favour.......If someone scores a match winning try and the pass goes 3 metres back, THEY CANNOT CALL IT FORWARD to save there bet....
if a kick goes between the sticks, they cant say no goal...
all what they do is get the 50.50 calls to favour them, tilt the odds on their side...Thats how you do it....
Like yesterday, if a team gets a 10-2 penalty count, the CHANCES are they are going to win....Thats all
Chances are Penrith gave away too many penalties because they are Ill disciplined useless boneheads... like NSW
Soths last week gave away penalty after penalty after penalty against brisbane...couldnt even get one in the last 60 minutes...yet this week, it all of a sudden changes...This happens to often..
The dogs lost a penalty count to the titans 11-2 a few weeks ago..
A 4th placed team against a busted rabble like the Titans get 11 penalties in a row? pleeeeaaaaaaaase
0
Quote Originally Posted by UnderandOver:
Chances are Penrith gave away too many penalties because they are Ill disciplined useless boneheads... like NSW
Soths last week gave away penalty after penalty after penalty against brisbane...couldnt even get one in the last 60 minutes...yet this week, it all of a sudden changes...This happens to often..
The dogs lost a penalty count to the titans 11-2 a few weeks ago..
A 4th placed team against a busted rabble like the Titans get 11 penalties in a row? pleeeeaaaaaaaase
How are you going to detect a bet on a game on more liquid markets like h2h and lines?
if a ref placed a $1k or even $2 bet on a head to head or line, how will they get caight when people are regularly placing $10,15 and even sometimes $20k bets on games?
You cant equivocate the Tandy incident to other incidents...The Tandy incident involved placing a large bet on a very very illiquid market, and it stood out compared to other bets...
We see $5k, $10k and even $20k bets on head to head and lines, but it would be weird to see that on a 1st scoring play
everytime you talk about betting markets you just embarrass yourself more. You simply do not know what you are talking about
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
How are you going to detect a bet on a game on more liquid markets like h2h and lines?
if a ref placed a $1k or even $2 bet on a head to head or line, how will they get caight when people are regularly placing $10,15 and even sometimes $20k bets on games?
You cant equivocate the Tandy incident to other incidents...The Tandy incident involved placing a large bet on a very very illiquid market, and it stood out compared to other bets...
We see $5k, $10k and even $20k bets on head to head and lines, but it would be weird to see that on a 1st scoring play
everytime you talk about betting markets you just embarrass yourself more. You simply do not know what you are talking about
everytime you talk about betting markets you just embarrass yourself more. You simply do not know what you are talking about
So if i place a $5k bet on this Friday night game for the dogs to win ML........it will create the same "bells" as if i put $5k on the Tigers to kick a penalty goal as the first scoring play?
If i put $5k on the dogs to win ML, it will create the same attention as if i put $5k or even $2k on the tigers penalty goal as the first scoring play?
Just like Lockyer abnd Lewis are jealous losers...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:
everytime you talk about betting markets you just embarrass yourself more. You simply do not know what you are talking about
So if i place a $5k bet on this Friday night game for the dogs to win ML........it will create the same "bells" as if i put $5k on the Tigers to kick a penalty goal as the first scoring play?
If i put $5k on the dogs to win ML, it will create the same attention as if i put $5k or even $2k on the tigers penalty goal as the first scoring play?
Just like Lockyer abnd Lewis are jealous losers...
If i bought $250k worth of NAB on the market, it will create the same attention to the ASX and ASIC as if i bought $250k worth of an illiquid hardly traded mining option.....
0
So according to Hirschfelder....
If i bought $250k worth of NAB on the market, it will create the same attention to the ASX and ASIC as if i bought $250k worth of an illiquid hardly traded mining option.....
So if i place a $5k bet on this Friday night game for the dogs to win ML........it will create the same "bells" as if i put $5k on the Tigers to kick a penalty goal as the first scoring play?
If i put $5k on the dogs to win ML, it will create the same attention as if i put $5k or even $2k on the tigers penalty goal as the first scoring play?
Just like Lockyer abnd Lewis are jealous losers...
If YOU did it, no. The bookies would be rubbing their hands in glee. If somebody they didn't know did it then yes
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
So if i place a $5k bet on this Friday night game for the dogs to win ML........it will create the same "bells" as if i put $5k on the Tigers to kick a penalty goal as the first scoring play?
If i put $5k on the dogs to win ML, it will create the same attention as if i put $5k or even $2k on the tigers penalty goal as the first scoring play?
Just like Lockyer abnd Lewis are jealous losers...
If YOU did it, no. The bookies would be rubbing their hands in glee. If somebody they didn't know did it then yes
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
