All Forums | Rugby

The official "everything single thing goes Melbourne' way in a game of League"

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3877
Posts: 120
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #76
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

Which team has gotten within 6 points of the storm at home missing there half back and one of the storms tries should never have been allowed.

Shove that up ya arse...



6 points vs Melbourne

6 points vs Newcastle

10 points vs Souths


potent attack
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #77

Storm win another penalty count. What a surprise

Please just one game can the refs call a Storm game stright

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #78

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



6 points vs Melbourne

6 points vs Newcastle

10 points vs Souths


potent attack

And Defense?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 7556
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



if no one cares, is it still a win?

oh come on, the ceo of the comp and that other old incontinent fart are on $1million + .... it MUST be important 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by snake2710:

Storm win another penalty count. What a surprise

Please just one game can the refs call a Storm game stright

vavai drops the ball into Tolman, even Vavai gave him self up....play on, next tackle, try...

Its just a rort.....

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #81
First game this season the Storm didn't cover the line


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #82
Downhill from now
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #83

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



6 points vs Melbourne

6 points vs Newcastle

10 points vs Souths


potent attack

30 + points against the Dragons who have one of the best defensive records in the comp...........

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #84

Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:

First game this season the Storm didn't cover the line


At home in melbourne i am talking about...

Oh that game against Canberra......raiders score a legit try before half time, called forward, surprise suprise the Storm get another fav call..

Its just a rort

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #85
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

And Defense?



lost by a combined 52-22 in those games

but the dogs had great wins against teams 12th, 13th and 15th on the ladder.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #86
Well i couldnt lose in the first 5 rounds but after that Panthers game i have just gone down hill and looks like there is no return
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #87

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



lost by a combined 52-22 in those games

but the dogs had great wins against teams 12th, 13th and 15th on the ladder.

The offensive numbers you quoted are the games that our half back Hodko was injured....

You conviniently leave that out.......Take out the halves of most teams and see how they go.......offensively

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #88
if you are claiming hodginkson the different then you are more delusional then I gave you credit for


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #89

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:

if you are claiming hodginkson the different then you are more delusional then I gave you credit for


How did we go in the first 3 rounds when Hodko played?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 16902
Posted: #90
Cock-a-doodle-doo...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

How did we go in the first 3 rounds when Hodko played?





who did they play?


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #92

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:





who did they play?


Pamthers AWAY, Warriors AWAY and DRAGONS

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 29184
Posted: #93
Panthers ordinary, Warriors a rabble, Dragons didn't turn up
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 29184
Posted: #94
Cowboys
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 29184
Posted: #95
 Roosters
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 16902
Posted: #96
Thanks for coming Roosters. Point a minute for the Cowboys...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #97

Thurston running a muck.......

Over.......

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

Pamthers AWAY, Warriors AWAY and DRAGONS



3 teams who are a combined 7-12, and each have a negative for and against

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 16902
Posted: #99
Is there anyone actually making money betting the NRL this year besides the refs and players ???...
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #100

Thurston+ Bowen = Shaq + Kobe

All Forums | Rugby
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.