Spurs at Wembley has a nice ring to it.
Im in the same boat. I just cant understand it.
As for parlaymakers, forget about it. Im rooting for them, but they are on life support.
Im in the same boat. I just cant understand it.
As for parlaymakers, forget about it. Im rooting for them, but they are on life support.
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
Thats really tough to answer. I understand your predicament, but let me give you tottenham as an example - yesterday I would have hated to lose a draw bet on that game because they scored a late goal - I just cant give good advice on whether I like Shakhtar to win or draw - I just think they will play them tight.
I do like the under, I think a 1-0, 0-0, or 1-1 is very likely. Would be surprised to see either team score twice.
Anyway, hope that helps.
Thats really tough to answer. I understand your predicament, but let me give you tottenham as an example - yesterday I would have hated to lose a draw bet on that game because they scored a late goal - I just cant give good advice on whether I like Shakhtar to win or draw - I just think they will play them tight.
I do like the under, I think a 1-0, 0-0, or 1-1 is very likely. Would be surprised to see either team score twice.
Anyway, hope that helps.
I like the under as well in the roma game....definitely the over in the other(barca) and hope for the tie...like van zack said in another post....don;t bet against barca..it's just not worth the stress....
GL to all!
I like the under as well in the roma game....definitely the over in the other(barca) and hope for the tie...like van zack said in another post....don;t bet against barca..it's just not worth the stress....
GL to all!
Thats really tough to answer. I understand your predicament, but let me give you tottenham as an example - yesterday I would have hated to lose a draw bet on that game because they scored a late goal - I just cant give good advice on whether I like Shakhtar to win or draw - I just think they will play them tight.
I do like the under, I think a 1-0, 0-0, or 1-1 is very likely. Would be surprised to see either team score twice.
Anyway, hope that helps.
Thats really tough to answer. I understand your predicament, but let me give you tottenham as an example - yesterday I would have hated to lose a draw bet on that game because they scored a late goal - I just cant give good advice on whether I like Shakhtar to win or draw - I just think they will play them tight.
I do like the under, I think a 1-0, 0-0, or 1-1 is very likely. Would be surprised to see either team score twice.
Anyway, hope that helps.
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
Yeah, I posted it originally yesterday. I always post current lines.
It was -120 about an hour ago, but I do see it is even up from there.
At -130, I probably would still bet it, but for far less.
GL
Yeah, I posted it originally yesterday. I always post current lines.
It was -120 about an hour ago, but I do see it is even up from there.
At -130, I probably would still bet it, but for far less.
GL
One thing nobody can accuse me of is not posting current lines - I do it every time - even if I have bet at a better line.
Yesterday, it was in the -109 range, and even up to an hour ago it was -120.
One thing nobody can accuse me of is not posting current lines - I do it every time - even if I have bet at a better line.
Yesterday, it was in the -109 range, and even up to an hour ago it was -120.
It might be worth a shot. In soccer, it is really tough because 89 great minutes and 1 bad minute means a goal, but I do think SD will be in a defensive posture. A 0-0 draw would suit them fine.
It might be worth a shot. In soccer, it is really tough because 89 great minutes and 1 bad minute means a goal, but I do think SD will be in a defensive posture. A 0-0 draw would suit them fine.
Not bonehead at all.
It is a home and home series. 2 games, one each played in each home stadium. The 2 game scores are added together, and whoever has the highest aggregate goal total advances. Away goals break ties.
Example:
1. Tott wins 1-0 in first leg.
if Tott wins second game 1-0, they advance 2-0.
if Tott loses second game 2-1, Milan advances 2-2 (based on 2-1 away goals).
If tott loses second game 1-0, they go to OT and shootout based on 1-1 aggregate, and 1-1 away.
Make sense?
Not bonehead at all.
It is a home and home series. 2 games, one each played in each home stadium. The 2 game scores are added together, and whoever has the highest aggregate goal total advances. Away goals break ties.
Example:
1. Tott wins 1-0 in first leg.
if Tott wins second game 1-0, they advance 2-0.
if Tott loses second game 2-1, Milan advances 2-2 (based on 2-1 away goals).
If tott loses second game 1-0, they go to OT and shootout based on 1-1 aggregate, and 1-1 away.
Make sense?
Not bonehead at all.
It is a home and home series. 2 games, one each played in each home stadium. The 2 game scores are added together, and whoever has the highest aggregate goal total advances. Away goals break ties.
Example:
1. Tott wins 1-0 in first leg.
if Tott wins second game 1-0, they advance 2-0.
if Tott loses second game 2-1, Milan advances 2-2 (based on 2-1 away goals).
If tott loses second game 1-0, they go to OT and shootout based on 1-1 aggregate, and 1-1 away.
Make sense?
Not bonehead at all.
It is a home and home series. 2 games, one each played in each home stadium. The 2 game scores are added together, and whoever has the highest aggregate goal total advances. Away goals break ties.
Example:
1. Tott wins 1-0 in first leg.
if Tott wins second game 1-0, they advance 2-0.
if Tott loses second game 2-1, Milan advances 2-2 (based on 2-1 away goals).
If tott loses second game 1-0, they go to OT and shootout based on 1-1 aggregate, and 1-1 away.
Make sense?
btw, I will publicly give you the credit for the term "douchebaggery" in my thread.
I need to cite my sources just like a College paper.
Havent had the chance to use the term Mental Masturbation in a sentence yet in 2011
btw, I will publicly give you the credit for the term "douchebaggery" in my thread.
I need to cite my sources just like a College paper.
Havent had the chance to use the term Mental Masturbation in a sentence yet in 2011
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
Today:
1. Shakthar +.5 -109 (2 units)
2. Shakthar to advance +105 (1.5 units)
3. Shakhtar UNDER 2 and 2.5 -108 (1.5 units) ADDED
btw, I will publicly give you the credit for the term "douchebaggery" in my thread.
I need to cite my sources just like a College paper.
Havent had the chance to use the term Mental Masturbation in a sentence yet in 2011
my all time favorite is still "douchemoron" - the superman of douchebags
btw, I will publicly give you the credit for the term "douchebaggery" in my thread.
I need to cite my sources just like a College paper.
Havent had the chance to use the term Mental Masturbation in a sentence yet in 2011
my all time favorite is still "douchemoron" - the superman of douchebags
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.