Posted:
#26
Japan: Omyia Ardija not to lose
EASY TO WIN
, Utd. to win would be a better choice because the odds are higher. I hope to win them both and they are equal to me, but Manchester -0.5 pays better...
Posted:
#42
man this betting shit is really funny
I was so sure of Lahti-1,5 and marehamn-1 bets,I was thinking of putting 5k and winning 12k,then because of late losses,i put 500$ for these 2,added gamba osaka -1,it won,returned me 3400$ but oh well..
and i was to add cerezo osaka to it but hesitated since japanese league is full of surprise shit
you read above i said kashima and kawasaki,i didnt add them for some reason and they won
that always happen,when you choose but not play they win,then you go with another team that loses,at least i got 3k back but still trying to recover from my last couple week losses
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by elsewhere:
man this betting shit is really funny
I was so sure of Lahti-1,5 and marehamn-1 bets,I was thinking of putting 5k and winning 12k,then because of late losses,i put 500$ for these 2,added gamba osaka -1,it won,returned me 3400$ but oh well..
and i was to add cerezo osaka to it but hesitated since japanese league is full of surprise shit
you read above i said kashima and kawasaki,i didnt add them for some reason and they won
that always happen,when you choose but not play they win,then you go with another team that loses,at least i got 3k back but still trying to recover from my last couple week losses
Posted:
#46
Quote Originally Posted by newrebelintown:
Calin....I really wanted to take that Malmo under but passed at the last second.......the juice increased for the over... 2 and 2.5 .at -136...from -116....that to me is a sure thing it stays under....but when I tried to buy the extra half of a point to 2.5....the under was a -110....
When I took (this morning) it was +102 under 2 and 2.5 at Pinnacle and I took it at my bookie as under 2.5 at 1.67 decimal.
That was purely based on your principle (power of +100)
Hot Forum Topics
