France Ligue 2
Clermont Foot over 2 -127 2 units
Holland 2
Zwolle over 3.5 -114
Germany 2
Aue pick +135 EVERY stat points to an AUE victory...what am I missing? ML is +241
France Ligue 2
Clermont Foot over 2 -127 2 units
Holland 2
Zwolle over 3.5 -114
Germany 2
Aue pick +135 EVERY stat points to an AUE victory...what am I missing? ML is +241
France Ligue 2
Clermont Foot over 2 -127 2 units
Holland 2
Zwolle over 3.5 -114
Germany 2
Aue pick +135 EVERY stat points to an AUE victory...what am I missing? ML is +241
my book has the NTL at +125
Are you sure your book didnt have the "pickem" price at +125 similar to mine...?
The NTL or +.5 line was -143 and is currently back to a pickem at the Greek at +115
The ML for AUE has moved from +241 to +213, so others are noticing this to.
I wish lutz could comment to tell us if anything is in the local papers about AUE fielding a B team or other personnel issues.
my book has the NTL at +125
Are you sure your book didnt have the "pickem" price at +125 similar to mine...?
The NTL or +.5 line was -143 and is currently back to a pickem at the Greek at +115
The ML for AUE has moved from +241 to +213, so others are noticing this to.
I wish lutz could comment to tell us if anything is in the local papers about AUE fielding a B team or other personnel issues.
Not sure the books would need to put a tricky line out on a German 2 match, and the Parma line looked about right. Many of us thought Samps were the better team and shouldnt have been around +200, but as we found out it is difficult to score on Parma at home.
Not sure the books would need to put a tricky line out on a German 2 match, and the Parma line looked about right. Many of us thought Samps were the better team and shouldnt have been around +200, but as we found out it is difficult to score on Parma at home.
sharp,
1) either the books are wrong, or
2) they know something we dont....
ummmm, safe bet is they know something we dont...
This is too much of a talent gap to get the line wong.
sharp,
1) either the books are wrong, or
2) they know something we dont....
ummmm, safe bet is they know something we dont...
This is too much of a talent gap to get the line wong.
Are you sure your book didnt have the "pickem" price at +125 similar to mine...?
The NTL or +.5 line was -143 and is currently back to a pickem at the Greek at +115
The ML for AUE has moved from +241 to +213, so others are noticing this to.
I wish lutz could comment to tell us if anything is in the local papers about AUE fielding a B team or other personnel issues.
yea, it was for a pickem..i got it mixed up
Are you sure your book didnt have the "pickem" price at +125 similar to mine...?
The NTL or +.5 line was -143 and is currently back to a pickem at the Greek at +115
The ML for AUE has moved from +241 to +213, so others are noticing this to.
I wish lutz could comment to tell us if anything is in the local papers about AUE fielding a B team or other personnel issues.
yea, it was for a pickem..i got it mixed up
raff, last year when p_66 was posting his plays, many were tailing his NTL plays, not realizing most of the tailers could only get PICKEM lines (because he was making teams who were -105 or so on the ML an NTL by hedging the draw....
what wasnt apparent to people was when you try to do that, you make the play cost around -350 to -400
raff, last year when p_66 was posting his plays, many were tailing his NTL plays, not realizing most of the tailers could only get PICKEM lines (because he was making teams who were -105 or so on the ML an NTL by hedging the draw....
what wasnt apparent to people was when you try to do that, you make the play cost around -350 to -400
sharp,
1) either the books are wrong, or
2) they know something we dont....
ummmm, safe bet is they know something we dont...
This is too much of a talent gap to get the line wong.
sharp,
1) either the books are wrong, or
2) they know something we dont....
ummmm, safe bet is they know something we dont...
This is too much of a talent gap to get the line wong.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.