i don't know who makes the calls on the series but i faded the nets lastnight because they are the NETS....those are the type of teams you do not bet on with this system
i have stuck with 'the strategy' and have had two losers this season and am now fading with the home team when the road dawg is in the bottom 5-10 in overall standings
i don't know who makes the calls on the series but i faded the nets lastnight because they are the NETS....those are the type of teams you do not bet on with this system
i have stuck with 'the strategy' and have had two losers this season and am now fading with the home team when the road dawg is in the bottom 5-10 in overall standings
the system will fail every once in a while, but if you are not buying points that may make the system fail more often, if you are buying the points then the system will fail less but when it does fail it will wipe you out pretty good if you go all 3.
i stick to the calendar but use my own discresion, i try not to buy points to lower the risk...but i sometimes buy them to get favorite to - 2 or 3 or a dawg up to 6 or 7.....i fade the teams that suck...most of time the sucky teams cover but the goal of this strategy is to not loss any of your series...
the system will fail every once in a while, but if you are not buying points that may make the system fail more often, if you are buying the points then the system will fail less but when it does fail it will wipe you out pretty good if you go all 3.
i stick to the calendar but use my own discresion, i try not to buy points to lower the risk...but i sometimes buy them to get favorite to - 2 or 3 or a dawg up to 6 or 7.....i fade the teams that suck...most of time the sucky teams cover but the goal of this strategy is to not loss any of your series...
EM to JM 1/22/10
Dear Genius
LAL was never "bettable" @ 3 1/2. Will you ever "man up"???????? Show me your bet ticket @ 3 1/2 and I'll forever hold my tongue!!
John
NBA League Contests | ||
01/20/10 4:16:28 PM | ||
01/20/10 4:26:31 PM | ||
01/20/10 9:16:27 PM | ||
01/20/10 11:26:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 12:06:28 AM | ||
01/21/10 12:56:32 AM | ||
01/21/10 4:36:28 AM | ||
01/21/10 12:56:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:26:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:06:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:16:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:26:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:16:30 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:46:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:56:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 4:16:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 4:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:26:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:46:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:56:27 PM |
>
> John,
>
> Depending on the spread you had on the Lakers, you could have won
> or pushed on your wager. Although the series is now closed at the
> +3.5 spread, you do have the option of remaking the [A] bet on
> their game vs. New York today and continue the series if you wish.
Any ideas on his new V3 version????????
EM to JM 1/22/10
Dear Genius
LAL was never "bettable" @ 3 1/2. Will you ever "man up"???????? Show me your bet ticket @ 3 1/2 and I'll forever hold my tongue!!
John
NBA League Contests | ||
01/20/10 4:16:28 PM | ||
01/20/10 4:26:31 PM | ||
01/20/10 9:16:27 PM | ||
01/20/10 11:26:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 12:06:28 AM | ||
01/21/10 12:56:32 AM | ||
01/21/10 4:36:28 AM | ||
01/21/10 12:56:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:26:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 1:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:06:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:16:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:26:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 2:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:16:30 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:46:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 3:56:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 4:16:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 4:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:26:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:36:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 5:46:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:06:28 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:46:27 PM | ||
01/21/10 6:56:27 PM |
>
> John,
>
> Depending on the spread you had on the Lakers, you could have won
> or pushed on your wager. Although the series is now closed at the
> +3.5 spread, you do have the option of remaking the [A] bet on
> their game vs. New York today and continue the series if you wish.
Any ideas on his new V3 version????????
stay away from pushes for the most part...but i think with the lakers facing three easy opp i would continue to ride them.
I had the lakers at 3.5...what is the issue? should have bought them to 6, whenever i play a dawg in this strategy i try and get them at 6 or higher. regardless keep betting the lakers...
nets should have never been a play....why chase the nets? that is a good spot for a fade........good teams you chase and really bad teams you fade
i've been perfect so far in the new year with one loser on the strategy with the pistons back in november i think.
stay away from pushes for the most part...but i think with the lakers facing three easy opp i would continue to ride them.
I had the lakers at 3.5...what is the issue? should have bought them to 6, whenever i play a dawg in this strategy i try and get them at 6 or higher. regardless keep betting the lakers...
nets should have never been a play....why chase the nets? that is a good spot for a fade........good teams you chase and really bad teams you fade
i've been perfect so far in the new year with one loser on the strategy with the pistons back in november i think.
stay away from pushes for the most part...but i think with the lakers facing three easy opp i would continue to ride them.
I had the lakers at 3.5...what is the issue? should have bought them to 6, whenever i play a dawg in this strategy i try and get them at 6 or higher. regardless keep betting the lakers...
nets should have never been a play....why chase the nets? that is a good spot for a fade........good teams you chase and really bad teams you fade
i've been perfect so far in the new year with one loser on the strategy with the pistons back in november i think.
stay away from pushes for the most part...but i think with the lakers facing three easy opp i would continue to ride them.
I had the lakers at 3.5...what is the issue? should have bought them to 6, whenever i play a dawg in this strategy i try and get them at 6 or higher. regardless keep betting the lakers...
nets should have never been a play....why chase the nets? that is a good spot for a fade........good teams you chase and really bad teams you fade
i've been perfect so far in the new year with one loser on the strategy with the pistons back in november i think.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.