JM: A 12/22 76ers +3/+5 buy 2 at youwager -150 L by 7 A/B 12/26 76ers +7.5/+9.5 buy 2 -150 at BM L by 23 B/C 12/28 76ers +7.5 opening line W by 11 35-2
I don't think the Celtics series was an official JM play so I won't count that as a JM loss. It might have been a V2 play I missed that covered the first game for a 36-2 record. ???????????
Version 2 Play JM: A 1/6 Nets +14/+16 buy 2 -150 at BookMaker AJM: A 1/6 Hawks -13.5 -110 at Betus I'm holding out for this line to drop to -13.
Version 2 plays don't get the same line variance as Version 1.
0
JM: A 12/22 76ers +3/+5 buy 2 at youwager -150 L by 7 A/B 12/26 76ers +7.5/+9.5 buy 2 -150 at BM L by 23 B/C 12/28 76ers +7.5 opening line W by 11 35-2
I don't think the Celtics series was an official JM play so I won't count that as a JM loss. It might have been a V2 play I missed that covered the first game for a 36-2 record. ???????????
Version 2 Play JM: A 1/6 Nets +14/+16 buy 2 -150 at BookMaker AJM: A 1/6 Hawks -13.5 -110 at Betus I'm holding out for this line to drop to -13.
Version 2 plays don't get the same line variance as Version 1.
smitler...going to play your system..do i play both jm and anti jm? Is a a single unit, b a double unit, and c a triple unit? With jm, do i always buy 3 pts? Thanks looks great.
0
smitler...going to play your system..do i play both jm and anti jm? Is a a single unit, b a double unit, and c a triple unit? With jm, do i always buy 3 pts? Thanks looks great.
smitler...going to play your system..do i play both jm and anti jm? Is a a single unit, b a double unit, and c a triple unit? With jm, do i always buy 3 pts? Thanks looks great.
You can play one or both. I am playing both for tracking purposes. The method you are talking about is Martingale where you double up after a loss. I don't do that very often. Too stressful. I play a version of the cross-out/labby method. For example cross-out line starts $10 $10 $10 $10 so bet both ends (10+10=$20). If that wins they are crossed out and you bet the next two (10 10=20). If that wins then that line is completely crossed out. Start a new line to cross out. Keep it the same or increase it.
If you lose the first bet add the loss to the end and add both ends ($10 10 10 10 20) 10+20=30. Essentially you are trying to win half of what you initially tried to win. 10 10 10 10 20 30 (10+30=40) if lose twice. If you win the second bet you cross out the 10 and 30 and bet the 10 and 20. A little less risky.
I use two or more accounts. Betus for the AJM because they are in cahoots with Morrison and adjust their lines. I use other accounts for JM and usually buy 2 pts. When you buy 3 pts at Betus its like buying 2 or 2.5 everywhere else. I usually post how I'm playin it. Watching line movement also has some benefit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by avenue:
smitler...going to play your system..do i play both jm and anti jm? Is a a single unit, b a double unit, and c a triple unit? With jm, do i always buy 3 pts? Thanks looks great.
You can play one or both. I am playing both for tracking purposes. The method you are talking about is Martingale where you double up after a loss. I don't do that very often. Too stressful. I play a version of the cross-out/labby method. For example cross-out line starts $10 $10 $10 $10 so bet both ends (10+10=$20). If that wins they are crossed out and you bet the next two (10 10=20). If that wins then that line is completely crossed out. Start a new line to cross out. Keep it the same or increase it.
If you lose the first bet add the loss to the end and add both ends ($10 10 10 10 20) 10+20=30. Essentially you are trying to win half of what you initially tried to win. 10 10 10 10 20 30 (10+30=40) if lose twice. If you win the second bet you cross out the 10 and 30 and bet the 10 and 20. A little less risky.
I use two or more accounts. Betus for the AJM because they are in cahoots with Morrison and adjust their lines. I use other accounts for JM and usually buy 2 pts. When you buy 3 pts at Betus its like buying 2 or 2.5 everywhere else. I usually post how I'm playin it. Watching line movement also has some benefit.
It makes no difference. Whatever you like best. 2 pts is almost always -150 so risking 15 to win 10 looks like 7.5-7.5-7.5-7.5. Alternatively, make the risk amount even like risking 12 to win 8 (6-6-6-6) or 30 to win 20 (15-15-15-15).
It makes no difference. Whatever you like best. 2 pts is almost always -150 so risking 15 to win 10 looks like 7.5-7.5-7.5-7.5. Alternatively, make the risk amount even like risking 12 to win 8 (6-6-6-6) or 30 to win 20 (15-15-15-15).
Smitler...thanks for the clippers win....so i crossed out 2 #s have 2 left with three games tonight....do i make all 3 plays the amt of the two #s left or am i suppose to have a line for jm and one for ajm? Thanks
0
Smitler...thanks for the clippers win....so i crossed out 2 #s have 2 left with three games tonight....do i make all 3 plays the amt of the two #s left or am i suppose to have a line for jm and one for ajm? Thanks
I would have to different lines. One for JM and one for AJM. JM1 and JM2 just notes what version (1 or 2) of Morrison's system the game falls under for tracking purposes. The Bucks series is over for AJM Lakers killed them Bucks will try again under JM against Suns. I will post updates tomorrow.
0
I would have to different lines. One for JM and one for AJM. JM1 and JM2 just notes what version (1 or 2) of Morrison's system the game falls under for tracking purposes. The Bucks series is over for AJM Lakers killed them Bucks will try again under JM against Suns. I will post updates tomorrow.
Avenue, this thread was started just to compare the results of the John Morrison (Its not his system but he is the douche that marketed it) system and going opposite without buying 3 points. You can follow only one system if you want.
0
Avenue, this thread was started just to compare the results of the John Morrison (Its not his system but he is the douche that marketed it) system and going opposite without buying 3 points. You can follow only one system if you want.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.