Lets share our favourite baseball systems in this thread. Whats your plans for baseball season?
Last season, I tried several RL six-game chase systems, I bet the ML if the chase went to a fifth game. That was meant to avoid any major losses, but a study of the strategy revealed it probably didn't make much difference. I played to bet, not win, units, so sometimes I would win less than a unit or even lose money on the chase. It just make for simpler bookkeeping.
1. Good vs. all; bad vs. all. 2. Good at home; bad on the road. 3.Good vs. bad.
The first system cost us major bucks in part because the Red Sox simply sucked at first. There was another problem or two, so we dropped that. Well, my friend quit so I was on my own.
System two involved the best or worst 3-4 teams in each league. If a good and bad team were playing each other, the game counted for each. Best and worst are related to schedule. Playing in the AL East is different from the AL Central. That's why Toronto was in the "bad" group even though it wasn't that bad a team.
This system produced several failures such as the Padres, who got me in both groups. Then we had the Buck Showalter Orioles and their infamous sweep of the Rangers in Arlington. SF's offense, or lack thereof, nailed me.
Despite all that, the system was at 200 units at the start of September. Then I took my eye off the ball. I had added too many teams instead of concentrating on a small number. I didn't pay attention to the end of the season and ran out of games. Looking at the spreadsheet, I failed to bet on a couple of chases, perhaps because the account was low.
The second system still netted 87 units, and looking back would have gone well over a hundred had I paid better attention.
System three was the one that had the fewest bets. As with the others, the composition of the group changed during the season. I suspended a few chases when a good team was on the road or a bad team was at home and one was on the fifth or sixth game. Houston recovered from its terrible start to play mediocre ball the rest of the way. I halted the home series against SL late in the season and forgot to pick up the Astros after that. I would have won the chase if I had done so. The bottom line is that I went from a high of 150 units to 125.
But then I lost almost all of it. I went with the two biggest favorites on the ML on the RL chase systems. I'm blaming it on Kreatture.
My preliminary picks are based on the Hardball Times projections: NY, Boston, Texas and Oakland in the AL with Baltimore, Cleveland and KC. In the NL, it's SL, Cincinnati, SF and LA with Houston and Pittsburgh. That's just a first glance. I'll also see what the folks at Baseball Prospectus have.
What was striking was that you can win money on these systems even with several failures.
I would say a productive little system is to play the good teams at home against the bad ones. I would not have lost a chase under that system. Of course, it all depends on which teams you choose.
The best teams do more than win, and the bad teams do more than lose. Finding the right ones can net you a nice piece of change.
One of the things we do here is to try systems and share our findings. I'm not saying anyone is going to get rich off what I just shared. It's just something I tried.
Last season, I tried several RL six-game chase systems, I bet the ML if the chase went to a fifth game. That was meant to avoid any major losses, but a study of the strategy revealed it probably didn't make much difference. I played to bet, not win, units, so sometimes I would win less than a unit or even lose money on the chase. It just make for simpler bookkeeping.
1. Good vs. all; bad vs. all. 2. Good at home; bad on the road. 3.Good vs. bad.
The first system cost us major bucks in part because the Red Sox simply sucked at first. There was another problem or two, so we dropped that. Well, my friend quit so I was on my own.
System two involved the best or worst 3-4 teams in each league. If a good and bad team were playing each other, the game counted for each. Best and worst are related to schedule. Playing in the AL East is different from the AL Central. That's why Toronto was in the "bad" group even though it wasn't that bad a team.
This system produced several failures such as the Padres, who got me in both groups. Then we had the Buck Showalter Orioles and their infamous sweep of the Rangers in Arlington. SF's offense, or lack thereof, nailed me.
Despite all that, the system was at 200 units at the start of September. Then I took my eye off the ball. I had added too many teams instead of concentrating on a small number. I didn't pay attention to the end of the season and ran out of games. Looking at the spreadsheet, I failed to bet on a couple of chases, perhaps because the account was low.
The second system still netted 87 units, and looking back would have gone well over a hundred had I paid better attention.
System three was the one that had the fewest bets. As with the others, the composition of the group changed during the season. I suspended a few chases when a good team was on the road or a bad team was at home and one was on the fifth or sixth game. Houston recovered from its terrible start to play mediocre ball the rest of the way. I halted the home series against SL late in the season and forgot to pick up the Astros after that. I would have won the chase if I had done so. The bottom line is that I went from a high of 150 units to 125.
But then I lost almost all of it. I went with the two biggest favorites on the ML on the RL chase systems. I'm blaming it on Kreatture.
My preliminary picks are based on the Hardball Times projections: NY, Boston, Texas and Oakland in the AL with Baltimore, Cleveland and KC. In the NL, it's SL, Cincinnati, SF and LA with Houston and Pittsburgh. That's just a first glance. I'll also see what the folks at Baseball Prospectus have.
What was striking was that you can win money on these systems even with several failures.
I would say a productive little system is to play the good teams at home against the bad ones. I would not have lost a chase under that system. Of course, it all depends on which teams you choose.
The best teams do more than win, and the bad teams do more than lose. Finding the right ones can net you a nice piece of change.
One of the things we do here is to try systems and share our findings. I'm not saying anyone is going to get rich off what I just shared. It's just something I tried.
I'm working on capping a underdog system for mlb. I only capped last years but so far it looks good, I think it would profit big with a aggressive labouchere line, heres the system
take american league teams vs central league and american league west vs central league bet on the under dog. the first game of the series has to be favord it makes no difference if the american league team is on the road or at home.
example would be if boston was playing mn it doesn't matter if boston is at home or away.
same thing seems to work with nl east vs nl central and NL west vs nl central.
there seems to be about 15 C bet losses but over 100 plays so I think aggressive labauchere would work well.
I'm working on capping a underdog system for mlb. I only capped last years but so far it looks good, I think it would profit big with a aggressive labouchere line, heres the system
take american league teams vs central league and american league west vs central league bet on the under dog. the first game of the series has to be favord it makes no difference if the american league team is on the road or at home.
example would be if boston was playing mn it doesn't matter if boston is at home or away.
same thing seems to work with nl east vs nl central and NL west vs nl central.
there seems to be about 15 C bet losses but over 100 plays so I think aggressive labauchere would work well.
Last season, I tried several RL six-game chase systems, I bet the ML if the chase went to a fifth game. That was meant to avoid any major losses, but a study of the strategy revealed it probably didn't make much difference. I played to bet, not win, units, so sometimes I would win less than a unit or even lose money on the chase. It just make for simpler bookkeeping.
1. Good vs. all; bad vs. all. 2. Good at home; bad on the road. 3.Good vs. bad.
The first system cost us major bucks in part because the Red Sox simply sucked at first. There was another problem or two, so we dropped that. Well, my friend quit so I was on my own.
System two involved the best or worst 3-4 teams in each league. If a good and bad team were playing each other, the game counted for each. Best and worst are related to schedule. Playing in the AL East is different from the AL Central. That's why Toronto was in the "bad" group even though it wasn't that bad a team.
This system produced several failures such as the Padres, who got me in both groups. Then we had the Buck Showalter Orioles and their infamous sweep of the Rangers in Arlington. SF's offense, or lack thereof, nailed me.
Despite all that, the system was at 200 units at the start of September. Then I took my eye off the ball. I had added too many teams instead of concentrating on a small number. I didn't pay attention to the end of the season and ran out of games. Looking at the spreadsheet, I failed to bet on a couple of chases, perhaps because the account was low.
The second system still netted 87 units, and looking back would have gone well over a hundred had I paid better attention.
System three was the one that had the fewest bets. As with the others, the composition of the group changed during the season. I suspended a few chases when a good team was on the road or a bad team was at home and one was on the fifth or sixth game. Houston recovered from its terrible start to play mediocre ball the rest of the way. I halted the home series against SL late in the season and forgot to pick up the Astros after that. I would have won the chase if I had done so. The bottom line is that I went from a high of 150 units to 125.
But then I lost almost all of it. I went with the two biggest favorites on the ML on the RL chase systems. I'm blaming it on Kreatture.
Are you the douchebag who wrote that thread I heard about who made up the sob story about losing his life???
The Criss-Cross Blitz and RunLine Blitz System NEVER experienced a loss last Season, and for you to say it did means you never played it the way it was supposed to be played. It's not my responsibilty to look after assholes who venture out on their own and play their own spin on a system which has proven success over a number of years.
It's fucking hilarious to hear sob stories from someone who blames someone else for losing all of their money. I didn't realize you had given me any money to invest for you in an account where I had full control over.
WHAT A FUCKING LOSER
Last season, I tried several RL six-game chase systems, I bet the ML if the chase went to a fifth game. That was meant to avoid any major losses, but a study of the strategy revealed it probably didn't make much difference. I played to bet, not win, units, so sometimes I would win less than a unit or even lose money on the chase. It just make for simpler bookkeeping.
1. Good vs. all; bad vs. all. 2. Good at home; bad on the road. 3.Good vs. bad.
The first system cost us major bucks in part because the Red Sox simply sucked at first. There was another problem or two, so we dropped that. Well, my friend quit so I was on my own.
System two involved the best or worst 3-4 teams in each league. If a good and bad team were playing each other, the game counted for each. Best and worst are related to schedule. Playing in the AL East is different from the AL Central. That's why Toronto was in the "bad" group even though it wasn't that bad a team.
This system produced several failures such as the Padres, who got me in both groups. Then we had the Buck Showalter Orioles and their infamous sweep of the Rangers in Arlington. SF's offense, or lack thereof, nailed me.
Despite all that, the system was at 200 units at the start of September. Then I took my eye off the ball. I had added too many teams instead of concentrating on a small number. I didn't pay attention to the end of the season and ran out of games. Looking at the spreadsheet, I failed to bet on a couple of chases, perhaps because the account was low.
The second system still netted 87 units, and looking back would have gone well over a hundred had I paid better attention.
System three was the one that had the fewest bets. As with the others, the composition of the group changed during the season. I suspended a few chases when a good team was on the road or a bad team was at home and one was on the fifth or sixth game. Houston recovered from its terrible start to play mediocre ball the rest of the way. I halted the home series against SL late in the season and forgot to pick up the Astros after that. I would have won the chase if I had done so. The bottom line is that I went from a high of 150 units to 125.
But then I lost almost all of it. I went with the two biggest favorites on the ML on the RL chase systems. I'm blaming it on Kreatture.
Are you the douchebag who wrote that thread I heard about who made up the sob story about losing his life???
The Criss-Cross Blitz and RunLine Blitz System NEVER experienced a loss last Season, and for you to say it did means you never played it the way it was supposed to be played. It's not my responsibilty to look after assholes who venture out on their own and play their own spin on a system which has proven success over a number of years.
It's fucking hilarious to hear sob stories from someone who blames someone else for losing all of their money. I didn't realize you had given me any money to invest for you in an account where I had full control over.
WHAT A FUCKING LOSER
Everyone is ten foot tall on the Web. I am sure you would make that rant if I were in front of you.
Second, I don't cuss at people in person or online, but to each his own.
Most important, Kreatture, it was a joke. But perhaps my subtle humor is too much for you. I figured you for a better person.
Looking at my spreadsheet, it is possible that the chase did not experience a loss, but I didn't run it as a straight chase. No need to go into details. My version included attempts to mitigate losses.
Instead of making a factual statement and then asking me how I ran my version of the chase, you decided to resort to name calling. Again, the anonymous nature of message boards allows you to get away with it. People aren't like that in person because they have to face the consequences of their actions.
Now, go ahead and cuss at me some more if it makes you feel better.
Everyone is ten foot tall on the Web. I am sure you would make that rant if I were in front of you.
Second, I don't cuss at people in person or online, but to each his own.
Most important, Kreatture, it was a joke. But perhaps my subtle humor is too much for you. I figured you for a better person.
Looking at my spreadsheet, it is possible that the chase did not experience a loss, but I didn't run it as a straight chase. No need to go into details. My version included attempts to mitigate losses.
Instead of making a factual statement and then asking me how I ran my version of the chase, you decided to resort to name calling. Again, the anonymous nature of message boards allows you to get away with it. People aren't like that in person because they have to face the consequences of their actions.
Now, go ahead and cuss at me some more if it makes you feel better.
Everyone is ten foot tall on the Web. I am sure you would make that rant if I were in front of you.
Yeah, I would. I stand up for myself in all cases. you can bet your ass if you accused me of something which wasn't true there wouldn't just be a rant. Your statement wasn't a subtle joke. If it was, it was very poor. You stated you blame me for losing all your money last year.. there's no further statement hinting that this was a joke.
The 2 Blitzes were perfect on the Chase, and the spreadsheet I had posted each day were proof of that. No one kept as well documented records for MLB last season as I did. What you should have said is you played those Blitzes according to your own style and not the way I was playing them, instead of blaming me for your own losses.
When you look up the word joke, maybe you should look up the word libel..
Everyone is ten foot tall on the Web. I am sure you would make that rant if I were in front of you.
Yeah, I would. I stand up for myself in all cases. you can bet your ass if you accused me of something which wasn't true there wouldn't just be a rant. Your statement wasn't a subtle joke. If it was, it was very poor. You stated you blame me for losing all your money last year.. there's no further statement hinting that this was a joke.
The 2 Blitzes were perfect on the Chase, and the spreadsheet I had posted each day were proof of that. No one kept as well documented records for MLB last season as I did. What you should have said is you played those Blitzes according to your own style and not the way I was playing them, instead of blaming me for your own losses.
When you look up the word joke, maybe you should look up the word libel..
Mr. K needs to get back on his meds. No one has "accused" you of anything. To borrow from Bill, you doth protest too much. And I notice that you can't get away from cussing at me on your thread. Is that your version of discourse? Instead of politely asking me where I got my info, you went postal. That's to be expected on a board where people aren't forced to be halfway polite. Get a thesaurus so you can find some more salty language.
Anyway, we're getting sidetracked from the original purpose of the thread, so I'm through commenting on the subject. And if anyone has anything else to say, my inbox is available. I'm going to be playing a RL chase this season and might do a thread on it.
Mr. K needs to get back on his meds. No one has "accused" you of anything. To borrow from Bill, you doth protest too much. And I notice that you can't get away from cussing at me on your thread. Is that your version of discourse? Instead of politely asking me where I got my info, you went postal. That's to be expected on a board where people aren't forced to be halfway polite. Get a thesaurus so you can find some more salty language.
Anyway, we're getting sidetracked from the original purpose of the thread, so I'm through commenting on the subject. And if anyone has anything else to say, my inbox is available. I'm going to be playing a RL chase this season and might do a thread on it.
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL INTERLEAGUE PLAY CHASE:
The National League has gotten hammered by the American League just about every season when Interleague play begins. Since 2204 the AL is 160 games over .500 vs the NL. That sets up an amazing chase system, and here is how it works:
PLAY AGAINST ANY NL TEAM IN INTERLEAGUE PLAY UNTIL THEY LOSE 1 GAME. IF THEY WIN YOU WAGER ENOUGH IN THE NEXT GAME TO MAKE 1 UNIT OF PROFIT. ONCE THEY LOSE, YOU NEVER PLAY ON THEM AGAIN FOR THE REMAINDER OF INTERLEAGUE PLAY.
THE LAST 6 YEARS HAVE SEEN THE FOLLOWING RESULTS:
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 1: 63 times out of 96 OR 65.6% OF THE TIME
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 2: 19 times out of remaining 33 OR 57.8% OF THE TIME, MEANING 82 of 96 games or 85.4% end in game 2
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 3: 12 of remaining 14 games or 85.7% of the time, meaning 94 of 96 games or 97.8% of the time, the chase ends in just 3 games.
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 4: 2 of the remaining 2 games or 100.0% of the time
That means no chase ever went past 3 losses!
That means 1 out of every 2 years you reach game 4, and one out of every 2 years you never lose more than 2 in a row!
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL INTERLEAGUE PLAY CHASE:
The National League has gotten hammered by the American League just about every season when Interleague play begins. Since 2204 the AL is 160 games over .500 vs the NL. That sets up an amazing chase system, and here is how it works:
PLAY AGAINST ANY NL TEAM IN INTERLEAGUE PLAY UNTIL THEY LOSE 1 GAME. IF THEY WIN YOU WAGER ENOUGH IN THE NEXT GAME TO MAKE 1 UNIT OF PROFIT. ONCE THEY LOSE, YOU NEVER PLAY ON THEM AGAIN FOR THE REMAINDER OF INTERLEAGUE PLAY.
THE LAST 6 YEARS HAVE SEEN THE FOLLOWING RESULTS:
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 1: 63 times out of 96 OR 65.6% OF THE TIME
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 2: 19 times out of remaining 33 OR 57.8% OF THE TIME, MEANING 82 of 96 games or 85.4% end in game 2
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 3: 12 of remaining 14 games or 85.7% of the time, meaning 94 of 96 games or 97.8% of the time, the chase ends in just 3 games.
CHASE ENDS IN GAME 4: 2 of the remaining 2 games or 100.0% of the time
That means no chase ever went past 3 losses!
That means 1 out of every 2 years you reach game 4, and one out of every 2 years you never lose more than 2 in a row!
Like most sports, the first month is always the best to bet the Underdogs. Any Underdog System should produce very well, but keep close tabs and realize when the tables are turning and get out with your profit. Once the All-Star Break hits, the top home teams then catch fire as they go on their run to the Playoffs, so the Home Favs are usually the way to go in August.
Can't wait for MLB 2011!
Like most sports, the first month is always the best to bet the Underdogs. Any Underdog System should produce very well, but keep close tabs and realize when the tables are turning and get out with your profit. Once the All-Star Break hits, the top home teams then catch fire as they go on their run to the Playoffs, so the Home Favs are usually the way to go in August.
Can't wait for MLB 2011!
A few stats on betting against Pittsburgh in 2010 based on six-game RL chases and longest chases.
All games: 80-0 two fives and two sixes.
Road: 43-0 with a five and a six.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/PIT/2010-schedule-scores.shtml
A few stats on betting against Pittsburgh in 2010 based on six-game RL chases and longest chases.
All games: 80-0 two fives and two sixes.
Road: 43-0 with a five and a six.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/PIT/2010-schedule-scores.shtml
I've spent a lot of time researching RL and ML chases for the past two seasons. I've gone the route of picking the worst and best teams at the start, then seeing how they do. I'll post some of the results. Of course, each season is unique.
A problem with this approach is that teams are going to unpleasantly surprise you. Look at 2010: Boston was terrible at the start. TB struggled at home. SD contended until the end. Texas got swept in four games at home against Baltimore. Toronto was lights out at the start. It is possible to lose a few chases and still win money.
I'll post a big of the research. I have more. This is from 2009. It involves the RL and ML chase records with the filter being that games within the group don't count.
NYY: 61-0, 73-0
Boston: 51-0, 67-0
TB: 44-0, 62-0
LAA: 54-0, 76-0
Philadelphia: 64-2, 91-1
LAD: 63-1, 87-0
Totals: 337-3, 456-1
KC: 67-2, 89-1
SD: 64-2, 80-1
Totals: 344-7, 441-4
Both groups: 681-10, 997-5
This involves good vs. bad teams from the same year. I'm going over 2010 and have one loss in the AL.
NYY: 16-0, 18-0
TB: 15-0, 22-0
LAA: 15-0, 20-0
LAD: 11-0, 15-0
Totals: 94-0, 122-0
KC: 17-0, 24-0
SD: 13-0, 17-0
Totals: 95-0, 123-0
KC did have one RL "loss" in this system in 2010, but I'm not through with the NL yet.
Luckydan has an excellent observation. You could pick your teams, then wait for them to have their "bad" stretch before taking them on.
I'll post some other info from last season in a while.
I've spent a lot of time researching RL and ML chases for the past two seasons. I've gone the route of picking the worst and best teams at the start, then seeing how they do. I'll post some of the results. Of course, each season is unique.
A problem with this approach is that teams are going to unpleasantly surprise you. Look at 2010: Boston was terrible at the start. TB struggled at home. SD contended until the end. Texas got swept in four games at home against Baltimore. Toronto was lights out at the start. It is possible to lose a few chases and still win money.
I'll post a big of the research. I have more. This is from 2009. It involves the RL and ML chase records with the filter being that games within the group don't count.
NYY: 61-0, 73-0
Boston: 51-0, 67-0
TB: 44-0, 62-0
LAA: 54-0, 76-0
Philadelphia: 64-2, 91-1
LAD: 63-1, 87-0
Totals: 337-3, 456-1
KC: 67-2, 89-1
SD: 64-2, 80-1
Totals: 344-7, 441-4
Both groups: 681-10, 997-5
This involves good vs. bad teams from the same year. I'm going over 2010 and have one loss in the AL.
NYY: 16-0, 18-0
TB: 15-0, 22-0
LAA: 15-0, 20-0
LAD: 11-0, 15-0
Totals: 94-0, 122-0
KC: 17-0, 24-0
SD: 13-0, 17-0
Totals: 95-0, 123-0
KC did have one RL "loss" in this system in 2010, but I'm not through with the NL yet.
Luckydan has an excellent observation. You could pick your teams, then wait for them to have their "bad" stretch before taking them on.
I'll post some other info from last season in a while.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.