tate thanx for the input! according to covers, if you played the cubs,bost,nym,nyy,laa,lad and tb you would be -521 {moneyline]and -1170 {run line]. these are probably the 7 most PUBLIC teams. it's always been a debate ml vs rl. right now ml is the way to go. as far as vig goes, it's the same whether it's one game or a 1000 games.
0
tate thanx for the input! according to covers, if you played the cubs,bost,nym,nyy,laa,lad and tb you would be -521 {moneyline]and -1170 {run line]. these are probably the 7 most PUBLIC teams. it's always been a debate ml vs rl. right now ml is the way to go. as far as vig goes, it's the same whether it's one game or a 1000 games.
sambuca, Im curious, again with bases, (and hockey) Playing on the BEST team for every game that week,, geesh,, tough nut to crack,
I havetn backtested it but I wonder, if you bet the best team to win thier first game?!?!
or again, Possible, a PROGRESSIVE BET on a -1.5 runline?? that would put JUICE on your side, and allow you to reasonably progressively bet 2-3 games in search of 1 win? Please accept this as constructive criticism, I rreally dig the angle here, and want to just try and throw some ideas around.
tater
0
sambuca, Im curious, again with bases, (and hockey) Playing on the BEST team for every game that week,, geesh,, tough nut to crack,
I havetn backtested it but I wonder, if you bet the best team to win thier first game?!?!
or again, Possible, a PROGRESSIVE BET on a -1.5 runline?? that would put JUICE on your side, and allow you to reasonably progressively bet 2-3 games in search of 1 win? Please accept this as constructive criticism, I rreally dig the angle here, and want to just try and throw some ideas around.
tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.
i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!
i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.
they could be right!
i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.
who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.
unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!
0
tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.
i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!
i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.
they could be right!
i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.
who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.
unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!
For curiousity sake.. how long do u plan on testing this for? There must be a cut-off point after so many losing weeks?
Have u thought about adding filters, like only playing these teams at home? Or possibly running a Chase on the Top 3 starting each week. I bet if u back tested the Top 3 teams on Chasing each week to win 1 game the results would be damn near 100%, maybe even 100%??
I am currently running a System where I play only the top Home Teams. There are filters involved, and it produced huge results so far.
Food 4 Thought
BOL
0
For curiousity sake.. how long do u plan on testing this for? There must be a cut-off point after so many losing weeks?
Have u thought about adding filters, like only playing these teams at home? Or possibly running a Chase on the Top 3 starting each week. I bet if u back tested the Top 3 teams on Chasing each week to win 1 game the results would be damn near 100%, maybe even 100%??
I am currently running a System where I play only the top Home Teams. There are filters involved, and it produced huge results so far.
tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.
i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!
i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.
they could be right!
i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.
who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.
unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!
Just noticed I missed this post.. guess you're testing for 2000 games.
This must be 2000 games combined in all Sports?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sambuca frank:
tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.
i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!
i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.
they could be right!
i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.
who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.
unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!
Just noticed I missed this post.. guess you're testing for 2000 games.
thanks kreature for the response. yes filters be be applied beginning at the start of ncaaf. that will be our 1 year anniversary for this thread. don't care to chase. been there done that!!!
right now my biggest filter is don't play baseball!!! however this system does better after the all star break.
the 3 commandments in sports betting:
patience, perserverance,discipline
gl
0
thanks kreature for the response. yes filters be be applied beginning at the start of ncaaf. that will be our 1 year anniversary for this thread. don't care to chase. been there done that!!!
right now my biggest filter is don't play baseball!!! however this system does better after the all star break.
thanks kreature for the response. yes filters be be applied beginning at the start of ncaaf. that will be our 1 year anniversary for this thread. don't care to chase. been there done that!!!
right now my biggest filter is don't play baseball!!! however this system does better after the all star break.
the 3 commandments in sports betting:
patience, perserverance,discipline
gl
Exactly right my friend.. you will lose some battles along the way, but it's the War we really care about.
Continued Success
0
Quote Originally Posted by sambuca frank:
thanks kreature for the response. yes filters be be applied beginning at the start of ncaaf. that will be our 1 year anniversary for this thread. don't care to chase. been there done that!!!
right now my biggest filter is don't play baseball!!! however this system does better after the all star break.
the 3 commandments in sports betting:
patience, perserverance,discipline
gl
Exactly right my friend.. you will lose some battles along the way, but it's the War we really care about.
king, its still going on. jimmy started a new thread a few weeks ago but keeping the same system. i believe it"s doing good after 500+- games. he post every day. i think it's up around 2200+-
0
king, its still going on. jimmy started a new thread a few weeks ago but keeping the same system. i believe it"s doing good after 500+- games. he post every day. i think it's up around 2200+-
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
