Teams that lost by more than 28+ points beyond the final posted spread are 6-1 ATS the following week this year. It is a small sample size but it might continue.
SJS, MN, UNLV, UAB, Marshall, BYU all covered their next game after being blown out the preceding week. Only Ole Miss did not cover vs GA. Not an advocate of chasing but might be worthy of keeping an eye on this possibility.
This trend applies only to normal board/lined teams vs other similar teams. Games like Oregon St losing to Sac St were not considered. Not even Hawaii losing SU at UNLV and then covering against a non-board team were considered. Hard to find books that take action on such games.
Army appears to the only play this week. Kansas got blown out two weeks ago but had a bye this past weekend. Could be a play if one wanted to expand the parameters this week.
Something to follow similar to the trend I posted (NFL section) last year about playing NFL teams that are on a two game roadie and not covering the first game. It was a good trend last year, and early indications appear to be the same this year.
Good luck.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Teams that lost by more than 28+ points beyond the final posted spread are 6-1 ATS the following week this year. It is a small sample size but it might continue.
SJS, MN, UNLV, UAB, Marshall, BYU all covered their next game after being blown out the preceding week. Only Ole Miss did not cover vs GA. Not an advocate of chasing but might be worthy of keeping an eye on this possibility.
This trend applies only to normal board/lined teams vs other similar teams. Games like Oregon St losing to Sac St were not considered. Not even Hawaii losing SU at UNLV and then covering against a non-board team were considered. Hard to find books that take action on such games.
Army appears to the only play this week. Kansas got blown out two weeks ago but had a bye this past weekend. Could be a play if one wanted to expand the parameters this week.
Something to follow similar to the trend I posted (NFL section) last year about playing NFL teams that are on a two game roadie and not covering the first game. It was a good trend last year, and early indications appear to be the same this year.
Teams that lost by more than 28+ points beyond the final posted spread are 6-1 ATS the following week this year. It is a small sample size but it might continue.
SJS, MN, UNLV, UAB, Marshall, BYU all covered their next game after being blown out the preceding week. Only Ole Miss did not cover vs GA. Not an advocate of chasing but might be worthy of keeping an eye on this possibility.
This trend applies only to normal board/lined teams vs other similar teams. Games like Oregon St losing to Sac St were not considered. Not even Hawaii losing SU at UNLV and then covering against a non-board team were considered. Hard to find books that take action on such games.
Army appears to the only play this week. Kansas got blown out two weeks ago but had a bye this past weekend. Could be a play if one wanted to expand the parameters this week.
Something to follow similar to the trend I posted (NFL section) last year about playing NFL teams that are on a two game roadie and not covering the first game. It was a good trend last year, and early indications appear to be the same this year.
Good luck.
Hi there, I am quite interested at what you got here. But I don't really get it. Care to elaborate a little more? Thanks!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Teams that lost by more than 28+ points beyond the final posted spread are 6-1 ATS the following week this year. It is a small sample size but it might continue.
SJS, MN, UNLV, UAB, Marshall, BYU all covered their next game after being blown out the preceding week. Only Ole Miss did not cover vs GA. Not an advocate of chasing but might be worthy of keeping an eye on this possibility.
This trend applies only to normal board/lined teams vs other similar teams. Games like Oregon St losing to Sac St were not considered. Not even Hawaii losing SU at UNLV and then covering against a non-board team were considered. Hard to find books that take action on such games.
Army appears to the only play this week. Kansas got blown out two weeks ago but had a bye this past weekend. Could be a play if one wanted to expand the parameters this week.
Something to follow similar to the trend I posted (NFL section) last year about playing NFL teams that are on a two game roadie and not covering the first game. It was a good trend last year, and early indications appear to be the same this year.
Good luck.
Hi there, I am quite interested at what you got here. But I don't really get it. Care to elaborate a little more? Thanks!
Army was the only play this week and they easily won/covered.
This week:
Temple Minnesota Tulane
Season to date is 7-1 ATS.
Good luck
i like how these games are spread apart on saturday. if MIN looks like it's a loser, then double up on TEM. if both lose, then chase with TUL. good luck!
12pm MIN +10
2pm TEM -9.5
8pm TUL +10
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Army was the only play this week and they easily won/covered.
This week:
Temple Minnesota Tulane
Season to date is 7-1 ATS.
Good luck
i like how these games are spread apart on saturday. if MIN looks like it's a loser, then double up on TEM. if both lose, then chase with TUL. good luck!
PHA is a play on the 2nd game of a 2 NFL road trip system. This system has not taken off like last year yet it is still worth keeping an eye on. Big line move in this game.
Good Luck.
0
PHA is a play on the 2nd game of a 2 NFL road trip system. This system has not taken off like last year yet it is still worth keeping an eye on. Big line move in this game.
Central Mich lost by 29 last week. The final spread was +1.5 for CM which makes a difference of 27.5. If the criteria is a difference of more than 28 how is C. Mich a play?
0
Central Mich lost by 29 last week. The final spread was +1.5 for CM which makes a difference of 27.5. If the criteria is a difference of more than 28 how is C. Mich a play?
Central Mich is not a play. W Mich is. They lost by 29 in the game vs N Illinois, and their number was anywhere from -2 to +2.5. I took in consideration various closing numbers, and feel that a play on W Mich is warranted. Hopefully it will hit this week.
Good Luck
0
Central Mich is not a play. W Mich is. They lost by 29 in the game vs N Illinois, and their number was anywhere from -2 to +2.5. I took in consideration various closing numbers, and feel that a play on W Mich is warranted. Hopefully it will hit this week.
Western Michigan appears to be a solid wager but Tulane is garbage...especially as a 12 point favorite vs. Memphis. Memphis has covered the spread in the past 5 meetings in this match up.
...no line set for the Troy game at time of post
0
System results look great so far.
Western Michigan appears to be a solid wager but Tulane is garbage...especially as a 12 point favorite vs. Memphis. Memphis has covered the spread in the past 5 meetings in this match up.
I meant W. Mich. Just trying to get a handle on what your parameters are. You specifially mentioned you only go by the closing number and I checked at least 2 places (even Covers showed W. Mich closed at +1').
GL2U.
0
I meant W. Mich. Just trying to get a handle on what your parameters are. You specifially mentioned you only go by the closing number and I checked at least 2 places (even Covers showed W. Mich closed at +1').
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.