Todays play :
Rays +1.5
Off the plane and back in the country to see that TB gave us another winner. That's 18 teams that have been through the system and won. I passed on TX but they also fit the system and won. MN and SD are pending at game 4.
LAD fit the system tonight and will probably be a dog tomorrow as well.
LAD +1.5 add on play for today.
No plays tomorrow. SD will be at LAD on Monday. MN won't be until 4/19 when they play the Chisox.
Off the plane and back in the country to see that TB gave us another winner. That's 18 teams that have been through the system and won. I passed on TX but they also fit the system and won. MN and SD are pending at game 4.
LAD fit the system tonight and will probably be a dog tomorrow as well.
LAD +1.5 add on play for today.
No plays tomorrow. SD will be at LAD on Monday. MN won't be until 4/19 when they play the Chisox.
Winner #20 last night with SD.
MN game 4 pending this Friday and NYY a possible play on Friday as well.
This system is almost over. Nice way to start the season.
No hoopla, just wins.
Winner #20 last night with SD.
MN game 4 pending this Friday and NYY a possible play on Friday as well.
This system is almost over. Nice way to start the season.
No hoopla, just wins.
NYY now added to the list of winners using this system. That's 21 wins, no losses with
MN +1.5 going today.
This will be the last play of this system for this season.
NYY now added to the list of winners using this system. That's 21 wins, no losses with
MN +1.5 going today.
This will be the last play of this system for this season.
In spite of my lack of faith, MN makes it 22 wins and no losses. I have my theories but I can't explain exactly why this system works. It just does.
Three weeks into the season and as promised +22 units. You're welcome.
A special thanks to a$$clown sports_Network.
In spite of my lack of faith, MN makes it 22 wins and no losses. I have my theories but I can't explain exactly why this system works. It just does.
Three weeks into the season and as promised +22 units. You're welcome.
A special thanks to a$$clown sports_Network.
In spite of my lack of faith, MN makes it 22 wins and no losses. I have my theories but I can't explain exactly why this system works. It just does.
Three weeks into the season and as promised +22 units. You're welcome.
A special thanks to a$$clown sports_Network.
you talk clown? right! because this clown was the only person to see through your transparent attention getting bullshit to captivate the recocognition you so dramatically seek. anyone other than the teenage groupies who have no understanding of value, and the termonology of MM connected to handicapping sports would agree; my previous post, earlier in this thread explains it all, let me refresh the realities of betting baseball " MM+value overpowers winning % get it? (take your head out of your behind) after your immature commentary, I took it upon myself to break down your so called "system" and realize exactly what your trying to do, and project. i can only comment without going into exhausted detail that, "take a long look in the mirror; that is where you'll find the 'true' clown of your description" surely not with a Covers "screen name" known as s_N
In spite of my lack of faith, MN makes it 22 wins and no losses. I have my theories but I can't explain exactly why this system works. It just does.
Three weeks into the season and as promised +22 units. You're welcome.
A special thanks to a$$clown sports_Network.
you talk clown? right! because this clown was the only person to see through your transparent attention getting bullshit to captivate the recocognition you so dramatically seek. anyone other than the teenage groupies who have no understanding of value, and the termonology of MM connected to handicapping sports would agree; my previous post, earlier in this thread explains it all, let me refresh the realities of betting baseball " MM+value overpowers winning % get it? (take your head out of your behind) after your immature commentary, I took it upon myself to break down your so called "system" and realize exactly what your trying to do, and project. i can only comment without going into exhausted detail that, "take a long look in the mirror; that is where you'll find the 'true' clown of your description" surely not with a Covers "screen name" known as s_N
Manage your bankroll appropriately. This is a 4 game chase. Using the +1.5 RL you will gain 20-30 units in the first 5-6 weeks of the season. The title of the thread explains it all but here it is again... Early season (meaning April and early May only AND it's a 1 and done. ONCE A TEAM GAINS A WIN, DON'T PLAY THEM AGAIN.) Road Dog In-Division RL (meaning +1.5 or occasionally +2.5 like today with the Marlins) 4 game chase (meaning manage your bankroll so that you don't crash and burn because of lack of funds to chase to completion) system.
You have the rules. Plays may or may not be posted here or elsewhere. Remember, MANAGE YOUR MONEY.
your 22 wins are based on 'chasing' you fail to mention your loses and the MM connected to them that are included on your way to fame. you have done nothing other than consistently "break even" at your best-
Manage your bankroll appropriately. This is a 4 game chase. Using the +1.5 RL you will gain 20-30 units in the first 5-6 weeks of the season. The title of the thread explains it all but here it is again... Early season (meaning April and early May only AND it's a 1 and done. ONCE A TEAM GAINS A WIN, DON'T PLAY THEM AGAIN.) Road Dog In-Division RL (meaning +1.5 or occasionally +2.5 like today with the Marlins) 4 game chase (meaning manage your bankroll so that you don't crash and burn because of lack of funds to chase to completion) system.
You have the rules. Plays may or may not be posted here or elsewhere. Remember, MANAGE YOUR MONEY.
your 22 wins are based on 'chasing' you fail to mention your loses and the MM connected to them that are included on your way to fame. you have done nothing other than consistently "break even" at your best-
SD +1.5 RL @ -155
you call this 'value' ? This happens to be a mild one, most of the +RL you are posting range from a minimum of -160 to well over -200 Do you even take under consideration the SP? or the handicap matchup? Do you even capp the game at large? or is all this in the blind? you consistently mention to "manage your bankroll" are you saying to double down on loses with prices above -160? the sacrafice of a half run just doesn't carry it's value in a ML sport, especially MLB. I doubt very seriously that you played this system for 3 winning seasons as you have stated; if so, back up your results, with documented facts. After in-depth review, I find this system posted "nowhere" on Covers.com last year (as you have stated), I would appreciate the links if you have them available. please continue, and incorporate your MM technique, attached to your loses...I am sure you must realize, regardless of the size of your bankroll, if you lose 3 games (not 3 chases), your wiped out- as you stated, "Manage your Bankroll"
SD +1.5 RL @ -155
you call this 'value' ? This happens to be a mild one, most of the +RL you are posting range from a minimum of -160 to well over -200 Do you even take under consideration the SP? or the handicap matchup? Do you even capp the game at large? or is all this in the blind? you consistently mention to "manage your bankroll" are you saying to double down on loses with prices above -160? the sacrafice of a half run just doesn't carry it's value in a ML sport, especially MLB. I doubt very seriously that you played this system for 3 winning seasons as you have stated; if so, back up your results, with documented facts. After in-depth review, I find this system posted "nowhere" on Covers.com last year (as you have stated), I would appreciate the links if you have them available. please continue, and incorporate your MM technique, attached to your loses...I am sure you must realize, regardless of the size of your bankroll, if you lose 3 games (not 3 chases), your wiped out- as you stated, "Manage your Bankroll"
A prime example
Miami Marlins +2.5 RL @ -325
a loss would put you at a $975 wager....winning a grand total of $100-
a second loss would put you at a $2925 wager, ect, ect
do you really feel Miami, a team in the lower NL bracket is not capable of losing 2 games to the Mets? realizing your next wager, based upon a loss will cost you close to 6k 'minimum' or; do you feel your going to win every game? as you have for the past 3 seasons? this is only one example, multiply it by 2 loses and your down 9k (based on 1unit=$100 I'm sure your reference of 22units is not based upon $220 rather then $2200
A prime example
Miami Marlins +2.5 RL @ -325
a loss would put you at a $975 wager....winning a grand total of $100-
a second loss would put you at a $2925 wager, ect, ect
do you really feel Miami, a team in the lower NL bracket is not capable of losing 2 games to the Mets? realizing your next wager, based upon a loss will cost you close to 6k 'minimum' or; do you feel your going to win every game? as you have for the past 3 seasons? this is only one example, multiply it by 2 loses and your down 9k (based on 1unit=$100 I'm sure your reference of 22units is not based upon $220 rather then $2200
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.