did you think about betting using the 10% method. assuming that your making money this would allow the bankroll to grow rather quickly and the starting bankroll could be smaller.
for the 10% method pick a starting point of 4-5% of bankroll bet every bet the same amount if the bets win raise your bets the next day by 10% if they lose lower the bets by 10%.
0
did you think about betting using the 10% method. assuming that your making money this would allow the bankroll to grow rather quickly and the starting bankroll could be smaller.
for the 10% method pick a starting point of 4-5% of bankroll bet every bet the same amount if the bets win raise your bets the next day by 10% if they lose lower the bets by 10%.
Hey man. I had to get new brakes, a battery and tires for my car tonight before winter gets too crazy. I passed on everything tonight. Looking up these 4 game trends is a lot of time. I will look into some games for tomorrow. I smacked the locals for $2K but almost all of it went to my car. I'd rather pay for maintenance though and not have a car payment.
0
Hey man. I had to get new brakes, a battery and tires for my car tonight before winter gets too crazy. I passed on everything tonight. Looking up these 4 game trends is a lot of time. I will look into some games for tomorrow. I smacked the locals for $2K but almost all of it went to my car. I'd rather pay for maintenance though and not have a car payment.
did you think about betting using the 10% method. assuming that your making money this would allow the bankroll to grow rather quickly and the starting bankroll could be smaller.
for the 10% method pick a starting point of 4-5% of bankroll bet every bet the same amount if the bets win raise your bets the next day by 10% if they lose lower the bets by 10%.
Bingo, and that's why I posted this system. Because I need guys smarter than me to pitch in and make it better. Any CEO or CFO will admit that their staff is smarter than they are. My ego is checked at the door fellas. I want to absorb as much info as possible. Make money. That's the #1 rule.
0
Quote Originally Posted by coolspot:
did you think about betting using the 10% method. assuming that your making money this would allow the bankroll to grow rather quickly and the starting bankroll could be smaller.
for the 10% method pick a starting point of 4-5% of bankroll bet every bet the same amount if the bets win raise your bets the next day by 10% if they lose lower the bets by 10%.
Bingo, and that's why I posted this system. Because I need guys smarter than me to pitch in and make it better. Any CEO or CFO will admit that their staff is smarter than they are. My ego is checked at the door fellas. I want to absorb as much info as possible. Make money. That's the #1 rule.
SO to humor your system, you only look at their last 4 picks not individual Sides vs ATS where some of these "experts" have some 10-0 streaks going. Based on the above you would not pick this game because you have 2 experts contradicting each others picks?
When you think about it, you are basing your picks on someone who may be biased on their team. There is no way to know if they are basing their picks on emotion or trends or stats or just following a better expert like you are doing.
More or less you are riding someone who is on a hot streak.
What I used to do is follow someone like "StanMarsh" who is number 2 expert for Philly. Currently he is 10-3 on his Sides and 8-0 on his totals when he picks Philly games. Here he is 21 pics in and sporting a 85% on his pics. Will he keep this up for the season, OF COURSE NOT.
Over All I don't think this is a great way to make wagers but for those of us who follow.....be careful to bet this way.
0
Personally this a total crapshoot and bears little merit. but because I am determined to make money and help out:
SO to humor your system, you only look at their last 4 picks not individual Sides vs ATS where some of these "experts" have some 10-0 streaks going. Based on the above you would not pick this game because you have 2 experts contradicting each others picks?
When you think about it, you are basing your picks on someone who may be biased on their team. There is no way to know if they are basing their picks on emotion or trends or stats or just following a better expert like you are doing.
More or less you are riding someone who is on a hot streak.
What I used to do is follow someone like "StanMarsh" who is number 2 expert for Philly. Currently he is 10-3 on his Sides and 8-0 on his totals when he picks Philly games. Here he is 21 pics in and sporting a 85% on his pics. Will he keep this up for the season, OF COURSE NOT.
Over All I don't think this is a great way to make wagers but for those of us who follow.....be careful to bet this way.
I'll test this out and post some plays for tonight here. Was slumping bad lately on my own pathetic capping anyways. And no modifications, just trying it out the way you have been, and see how it fares.
What I did whenever there was a "push" during someones streak is allow that expert's streak to cancel out plays if it was on the other side of an expert (or at times multiple experts) who was on a legit streak that looked like a play. But I would NOT side with streaks like that and tail to make a play.
Here are NBA plays for tonight. Only other sport I looked at was NHL, but none qualified.
Plays:
LA Clippers -6 and the Over 198.5
Chicago -2.5
Minnesota +6.5
San Antonio -3.5
Portland -5
0
I'll test this out and post some plays for tonight here. Was slumping bad lately on my own pathetic capping anyways. And no modifications, just trying it out the way you have been, and see how it fares.
What I did whenever there was a "push" during someones streak is allow that expert's streak to cancel out plays if it was on the other side of an expert (or at times multiple experts) who was on a legit streak that looked like a play. But I would NOT side with streaks like that and tail to make a play.
Here are NBA plays for tonight. Only other sport I looked at was NHL, but none qualified.
I'll test this out and post some plays for tonight here. Was slumping bad lately on my own pathetic capping anyways. And no modifications, just trying it out the way you have been, and see how it fares.
What I did whenever there was a "push" during someones streak is allow that expert's streak to cancel out plays if it was on the other side of an expert (or at times multiple experts) who was on a legit streak that looked like a play. But I would NOT side with streaks like that and tail to make a play.
Here are NBA plays for tonight. Only other sport I looked at was NHL, but none qualified.
Plays:
LA Clippers -6 and the Over 198.5
Chicago -2.5
Minnesota +6.5
San Antonio -3.5
Portland -5
i thank you for all your effort this must have taken a long time, but the only team I double checked was Portland and I found only 1 expert with exactly won last 4 & he also chose over 207 in that game too. The expert was chuck4tennis.
0
Quote Originally Posted by abnormality:
I'll test this out and post some plays for tonight here. Was slumping bad lately on my own pathetic capping anyways. And no modifications, just trying it out the way you have been, and see how it fares.
What I did whenever there was a "push" during someones streak is allow that expert's streak to cancel out plays if it was on the other side of an expert (or at times multiple experts) who was on a legit streak that looked like a play. But I would NOT side with streaks like that and tail to make a play.
Here are NBA plays for tonight. Only other sport I looked at was NHL, but none qualified.
Plays:
LA Clippers -6 and the Over 198.5
Chicago -2.5
Minnesota +6.5
San Antonio -3.5
Portland -5
i thank you for all your effort this must have taken a long time, but the only team I double checked was Portland and I found only 1 expert with exactly won last 4 & he also chose over 207 in that game too. The expert was chuck4tennis.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.