If you have the historical data, testing various formulas wouldn't take long at all -- a few minutes for each trial. The data would have to be in some format, preferably in a ' .csv ' (comma seperated values) file. Easier to test then to risk money.
If you have the historical data, testing various formulas wouldn't take long at all -- a few minutes for each trial. The data would have to be in some format, preferably in a ' .csv ' (comma seperated values) file. Easier to test then to risk money.
I use a similar formula to get a base line number. VGPOP adds some very valuable information to the base number. You need to come up with values for each of those variations to round your number into form.
Just remember these factors are also built into the line LVSC puts out.
I would also recommend using your own power ratings to come up with a line. I use a similar pace-formula and compare it with my power ratings in order to come up with several lines.
These are then compared with the posted numbers, and when my lines agree, and IMO are sharper than theirs, it is a play.
I use a similar formula to get a base line number. VGPOP adds some very valuable information to the base number. You need to come up with values for each of those variations to round your number into form.
Just remember these factors are also built into the line LVSC puts out.
I would also recommend using your own power ratings to come up with a line. I use a similar pace-formula and compare it with my power ratings in order to come up with several lines.
These are then compared with the posted numbers, and when my lines agree, and IMO are sharper than theirs, it is a play.
Hot Forum Topics
