All Forums | Systems & Strategies

JM NFL System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 46188
Posts: 267
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 8
Posted: #101

Has anyone used the sports betting professor? Does anyone have or know where to get his picks?

Thanks

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #102
Quote Originally Posted by rm2673:


what if i were illiterate? then you rant for nothing. luckily thats not the case lol


I don't think illiteracy is your only problem.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 56
Posted: #103
Quote Originally Posted by on3:

solid win today with the Titans. also picked up a win SU and ATS for the Bears with my modified system. the Giants lost today, but now they will fall under the JM system too next week.

week 9 plays:
NY Giants
Tampa Bay

week 10 potentials:
Detroit
Washington

week 11 potentials:
Cleveland

modified system plays for week 9:
NY Giants (B bet)
Atlanta Falcons (potential)

modified system plays for week 10 potentials:
Green Bay
Arizona
Denver

Is everything a go for these week 10 potentials?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #104
Quote Originally Posted by ASSPHALTCOWGIRL:


Is everything a go for these week 10 potentials?


Yep both have lost 3 time ATS and SU
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 36
Posted: #105

on3,

Not to confuse the peanut gallery, but isn't Dener a modified by? There are playing a JM play, so maybe you just filtered it?

Thanks for your work,

Jsqd

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 36
Posted: #106

*modified play

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 310
Posted: #107
Quote Originally Posted by JSqd25:

on3,

Not to confuse the peanut gallery, but isn't Dener a modified by? There are playing a JM play, so maybe you just filtered it?

Thanks for your work,

Jsqd



to be honest, i didnt know what to do with denver this week since they were going up against a team that fell into the JM system. id like to ask you guys what do you think we should do?

a. play washington under JM system (the line is tricky, 3 seems too easy for denver, and whenever it is too easy you know vegas has something up its sleeve)
b. play denver ML and play washington +3.5 and hope for a middle?
c. play denver ML and save the washington play for next week

im leaning towards option b., but im going to keep my units small for the modified system since it is going against the JM system this week.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #108
B sounds like the best of both worlds.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 141
Posted: #109

Arizona is NOT a Modified system play for week 10...they won and covered last weekend vs. Chicago.  Denver and GB are Modified system plays....

For the record, I like Option B from On3 on the Denver/Washington game....Then we can just follow up with the loser for next week if it generates another play.....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 36
Posted: #110
I'm using a lab mm, so i'll be going with option B. Probably won't get the middle, but you never know...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #111
2-0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #112
I'm thinkin more like 1-1.  had lions 16.5.  too stupid to buy a half or one.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 1191
Posted: #113
I bought 1 point for Detroit from +16.5 to +17.5 thinking 17 could be a possibility.  Worked out quite well.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #114
Quote Originally Posted by smitler:

I'm thinkin more like 1-1.  had lions 16.5.  too stupid to buy a half or one.


That sucks but for the system it was a winner because the closing line was 17 and the system says to buy a point or a half point on key numbers.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 350
Posted: #115

I wouldn't consider 17 a key number. This is exactly from the morrison pdf file:

I also recommend that you buy half a point (.5) onto the point spread if your team happens to be an underdog with an exact spread of either +2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7.

By your reasoning; would 27 would be a key number as well?

My understanding is for spreads that are common week to week like those he lists above (+2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7).

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 16266
Posted: #116
some people use key numbers like 10 17 and 21 also.. 10.5 17.5 and 21.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #117
Quote Originally Posted by MikeyFingers:

I wouldn't consider 17 a key number. This is exactly from the morrison pdf file:

I also recommend that you buy half a point (.5) onto the point spread if your team happens to be an underdog with an exact spread of either +2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7.

By your reasoning; would 27 would be a key number as well?

My understanding is for spreads that are common week to week like those he lists above (+2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7).



Yes I know JM says only to 7 but can you honestly tell me that 14, 17, or 21 are not key numbers? A lot of games end with these key numbers. So yes I do consider it a key number.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 310
Posted: #118
another two wins today (with detroit @ +17.5) and washington winning SU. for anyone who plays the JM system, please buy half points on ALL key numbers (10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21). the juice wont kill you at -130, so why not do it??

also, picked up a win with the modified system with Green Bay. i probably wouldnt have played GB against that agressive Dallas if it didnt fall into the system, so I am glad it worked out and some of you followed.
 
JM System so far: 14-0

Week 11 plays:
NY Giants (B bet, C bet for modified)
Cleveland

Modified Week 11 plays:
Philadelphia ML
Denver Broncos (B bet)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 141
Posted: #119
Isn't Denver a 'A' Play under the JM System after 3 straight ATS and SU losses.?  So that would make them an A play under JM and also a B play on the Modified side. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 219
Posted: #120
Yeah Denver should be an A bet this weekend for JM
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 15
Posted: #121
Yeah Denver is an A bet but for some reason ppl are posting modified versions of the JM NFL system on the JM NFL system and ppl are getting confused. They should start a modified JM NFL system post.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 310
Posted: #122
just a note, kyle orton is out for the broncos. JM has a habit of eliminating a loss if a star is out for the team. make sure you play denver with caution this week.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 86
Posted: #123
Been following the forum (with success), but never posted...just wanted pass on another note I came across...A supposed JM filter update is recommending that for UD's only double digit NFL UD's should be played on from this point...That would eliminate the DEN (a) and Cle (a)???...It leaves the NYG (b) and the mod on PHI (a)...thoughts...I can paste for review... 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 310
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by ramper71:

Been following the forum (with success), but never posted...just wanted pass on another note I came across...A supposed JM filter update is recommending that for UD's only double digit NFL UD's should be played on from this point...That would eliminate the DEN (a) and Cle (a)???...It leaves the NYG (b) and the mod on PHI (a)...thoughts...I can paste for review... 


can someone else verify this??
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 243
Posted: #125
that's only for his playing surface system
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.