what sports book do you belong too obviosly not a respectable one if they kick you out. find one that respects everybody. like bet jamaica.
what sports book do you belong too obviosly not a respectable one if they kick you out. find one that respects everybody. like bet jamaica.
what sports book do you belong too obviosly not a respectable one if they kick you out. find one that respects everybody. like bet jamaica.
GETMERESULTS
Thanks for the reply. As far as PSIC goes, things are going pretty good still, I've been getting some tennis from him as well, which have been pretty solid. Just tennis alone, I haven't had a losing day yet, knock on wood. Basketball, with his halftime plays is going pretty good as well. I am really looking forward to baseball with him, I keep hearing how good in baseball he is, we will see!!?? (Accept me as a friend) when you get a chance, I want to ask you something about these Jimmy Young character.
THANKS
GETMERESULTS
Thanks for the reply. As far as PSIC goes, things are going pretty good still, I've been getting some tennis from him as well, which have been pretty solid. Just tennis alone, I haven't had a losing day yet, knock on wood. Basketball, with his halftime plays is going pretty good as well. I am really looking forward to baseball with him, I keep hearing how good in baseball he is, we will see!!?? (Accept me as a friend) when you get a chance, I want to ask you something about these Jimmy Young character.
THANKS
You are not exactly correct. He listed Sac as a C play (it was listed as a play). Sac was playing Philly and getting their clocks cleaned at halftime. The game started at 7:05. At about 9:30 Morrison sent out an email stating that Sac wasn't a play because they were the worst defensive team. I have the email to prove it.
He changed the info on the link he sends.
When questioned on it JM claimed the play was a personal play. He has acted like the game(series) never existed.
Since realistically being 0-1 the system has been money going 72 - 0. Would have had another win but chose not to play Okl City when they fit the system. OKL City won on the A game.
I am not a promoter just looking to make $$$ and give credit where credit is due. Its amazing how many times when the dust clears on a series it is a win even when it seems not to be a smart play.
It just bothers me he doesn't man up about it.
He did the same thing with baseball. Last year his system ended up with 5 losses. (I followed it from day 1). He recalculated the system at the end of the year with a filter that supposedly would have made the system 33-0. That is what he claimed the system was. That still wouldn't be accurate because the Red Sox lost 1 of the series against the Angels at home. The filter eliminates playing lower winning % teams.
Bottom line 72-1 is still awesome, just man up after a hiccup.
Best of Luck
You are not exactly correct. He listed Sac as a C play (it was listed as a play). Sac was playing Philly and getting their clocks cleaned at halftime. The game started at 7:05. At about 9:30 Morrison sent out an email stating that Sac wasn't a play because they were the worst defensive team. I have the email to prove it.
He changed the info on the link he sends.
When questioned on it JM claimed the play was a personal play. He has acted like the game(series) never existed.
Since realistically being 0-1 the system has been money going 72 - 0. Would have had another win but chose not to play Okl City when they fit the system. OKL City won on the A game.
I am not a promoter just looking to make $$$ and give credit where credit is due. Its amazing how many times when the dust clears on a series it is a win even when it seems not to be a smart play.
It just bothers me he doesn't man up about it.
He did the same thing with baseball. Last year his system ended up with 5 losses. (I followed it from day 1). He recalculated the system at the end of the year with a filter that supposedly would have made the system 33-0. That is what he claimed the system was. That still wouldn't be accurate because the Red Sox lost 1 of the series against the Angels at home. The filter eliminates playing lower winning % teams.
Bottom line 72-1 is still awesome, just man up after a hiccup.
Best of Luck
You are not exactly correct. He listed Sac as a C play (it was listed as a play). Sac was playing Philly and getting their clocks cleaned at halftime. The game started at 7:05. At about 9:30 Morrison sent out an email stating that Sac wasn't a play because they were the worst defensive team. I have the email to prove it.
He changed the info on the link he sends.
When questioned on it JM claimed the play was a personal play. He has acted like the game(series) never existed.
Since realistically being 0-1 the system has been money going 72 - 0. Would have had another win but chose not to play Okl City when they fit the system. OKL City won on the A game.
I am not a promoter just looking to make $$$ and give credit where credit is due. Its amazing how many times when the dust clears on a series it is a win even when it seems not to be a smart play.
It just bothers me he doesn't man up about it.
He did the same thing with baseball. Last year his system ended up with 5 losses. (I followed it from day 1). He recalculated the system at the end of the year with a filter that supposedly would have made the system 33-0. That is what he claimed the system was. That still wouldn't be accurate because the Red Sox lost 1 of the series against the Angels at home. The filter eliminates playing lower winning % teams.
Bottom line 72-1 is still awesome, just man up after a hiccup.
Best of Luck
You are correct PUPPET, I remember it well, the east/west system is great and it's work well, especially this year, but you don't need morrison to figure out who you are suppose to play each day. Save your $197, plus all the other $$ he will try to get out of you.
GL
You are not exactly correct. He listed Sac as a C play (it was listed as a play). Sac was playing Philly and getting their clocks cleaned at halftime. The game started at 7:05. At about 9:30 Morrison sent out an email stating that Sac wasn't a play because they were the worst defensive team. I have the email to prove it.
He changed the info on the link he sends.
When questioned on it JM claimed the play was a personal play. He has acted like the game(series) never existed.
Since realistically being 0-1 the system has been money going 72 - 0. Would have had another win but chose not to play Okl City when they fit the system. OKL City won on the A game.
I am not a promoter just looking to make $$$ and give credit where credit is due. Its amazing how many times when the dust clears on a series it is a win even when it seems not to be a smart play.
It just bothers me he doesn't man up about it.
He did the same thing with baseball. Last year his system ended up with 5 losses. (I followed it from day 1). He recalculated the system at the end of the year with a filter that supposedly would have made the system 33-0. That is what he claimed the system was. That still wouldn't be accurate because the Red Sox lost 1 of the series against the Angels at home. The filter eliminates playing lower winning % teams.
Bottom line 72-1 is still awesome, just man up after a hiccup.
Best of Luck
You are correct PUPPET, I remember it well, the east/west system is great and it's work well, especially this year, but you don't need morrison to figure out who you are suppose to play each day. Save your $197, plus all the other $$ he will try to get out of you.
GL
PROF8T
Sorry it took so long to respond I just now found this post. Well plan and simple I pay a lot more for those and some halftime plays as well, to me it's worth it. I get other stuff from him as well, for example: horses, MMA, if you can believe this PING PONG, no bull-shit it wins. I'll play whatever wins. Well take care.
GL
PROF8T
Sorry it took so long to respond I just now found this post. Well plan and simple I pay a lot more for those and some halftime plays as well, to me it's worth it. I get other stuff from him as well, for example: horses, MMA, if you can believe this PING PONG, no bull-shit it wins. I'll play whatever wins. Well take care.
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.