When you buy his WNBA system, he had the picks for the entire season emailed to you. Then as the series were played, when you opened up the email the series would show where the series was won (e.g. Game 1), still showing the entire schedule--those games played and those remaining. So 5 series plays into the season his email schedule would show those 5 series wins (at [A], [B], or [C] as the case may be) and show the remaing series plays yet to come.
Now I don't know how he was able to manipulate that email that is in my inbox, but the schedule would be updated--in an email that's been sitting in my inbox for weeks--as the season progressed.
Now, since this system loss, the schedule has dissappeared except for the last remaing system/series play.
So no mention of the series loss from JM, but somehow he is able to reach into my email and change the look of the schedue as the season progress showing series wins, until the loss--then the schedule just *poof* disappeared except for the last series play.
Hope this satisfies your curiosity regarding how JM dealt with the WNBA system loss.
0
Regarding the WNBA. Here's what JM did do.
When you buy his WNBA system, he had the picks for the entire season emailed to you. Then as the series were played, when you opened up the email the series would show where the series was won (e.g. Game 1), still showing the entire schedule--those games played and those remaining. So 5 series plays into the season his email schedule would show those 5 series wins (at [A], [B], or [C] as the case may be) and show the remaing series plays yet to come.
Now I don't know how he was able to manipulate that email that is in my inbox, but the schedule would be updated--in an email that's been sitting in my inbox for weeks--as the season progressed.
Now, since this system loss, the schedule has dissappeared except for the last remaing system/series play.
So no mention of the series loss from JM, but somehow he is able to reach into my email and change the look of the schedue as the season progress showing series wins, until the loss--then the schedule just *poof* disappeared except for the last series play.
Hope this satisfies your curiosity regarding how JM dealt with the WNBA system loss.
In the past, all you needed was 1 email from JM and you could click on the link inside and the plays would change in the link as the week progressed.
That is how he could manipulate your email even though you already opened it. I would forward one email to a friend and he used that 1 email for the NBA season.
At the beginning of the NBA season, JM listed the 1st series Sac as a (C) play. At halftime they were getting their clocks cleaned by Philly and JM sent an email after 9 oclock (7pm game) stating how this game wasn't a system play but a personal play. He changed the info in the link.
It might seem strange but it is true.
The final WNBA series is listed in an email today but his message is cut and dry. No giving high fives or clicking glasses together or grinning from ear to ear.
JM doesn't man up for a beat.to the system.
In MLB You kept reading how the unofficial and official systems were both undefeated. When KC lost their unofficial series, JM stated that is why you have to use the filter.
He stopped promoting unofficial plays for a while. Then came back with it has only lost 1 time.
As mentioned it will be interesting to see the WNBA promotion next year.
It has only lost 1 time in 10 years.will have to be changed to 2 in 11. (if that is even true. I personally haven't followed the WNBA until this year).
To be continued.....................
Best of Luck
0
In the past, all you needed was 1 email from JM and you could click on the link inside and the plays would change in the link as the week progressed.
That is how he could manipulate your email even though you already opened it. I would forward one email to a friend and he used that 1 email for the NBA season.
At the beginning of the NBA season, JM listed the 1st series Sac as a (C) play. At halftime they were getting their clocks cleaned by Philly and JM sent an email after 9 oclock (7pm game) stating how this game wasn't a system play but a personal play. He changed the info in the link.
It might seem strange but it is true.
The final WNBA series is listed in an email today but his message is cut and dry. No giving high fives or clicking glasses together or grinning from ear to ear.
JM doesn't man up for a beat.to the system.
In MLB You kept reading how the unofficial and official systems were both undefeated. When KC lost their unofficial series, JM stated that is why you have to use the filter.
He stopped promoting unofficial plays for a while. Then came back with it has only lost 1 time.
As mentioned it will be interesting to see the WNBA promotion next year.
It has only lost 1 time in 10 years.will have to be changed to 2 in 11. (if that is even true. I personally haven't followed the WNBA until this year).
Soooooo, I take it ol' JM is a wuss. With balls the size of grapefruits when he wins, he sure doesn't have any when it comes to losses.
Looks like his [A] bets in MLB last night didn't help. Hopefully we get them back tonight, but I do not like Baltimore's chances. As Nole says, their best chance is tonight, the [B] bet. I imagine if there is another unofficial series loss before end of the season, he will most likely not promote the distinction between official and unofficial next year. He will just get rid of all the unofficial plays, then zap you with an [A] bet on his V3 system the following day.
0
Soooooo, I take it ol' JM is a wuss. With balls the size of grapefruits when he wins, he sure doesn't have any when it comes to losses.
Looks like his [A] bets in MLB last night didn't help. Hopefully we get them back tonight, but I do not like Baltimore's chances. As Nole says, their best chance is tonight, the [B] bet. I imagine if there is another unofficial series loss before end of the season, he will most likely not promote the distinction between official and unofficial next year. He will just get rid of all the unofficial plays, then zap you with an [A] bet on his V3 system the following day.
does anyone have a list of all the plays from the beginning of the mlb season till now? i wanted to back test and see if you went against jm in every series would you be undefeated. thanks for your help if anyone has it
0
does anyone have a list of all the plays from the beginning of the mlb season till now? i wanted to back test and see if you went against jm in every series would you be undefeated. thanks for your help if anyone has it
does anyone have a list of all the plays from the beginning of the mlb season till now? i wanted to back test and see if you went against jm in every series would you be undefeated. thanks for your help if anyone has it
Without going thru every single teams results I know the Bos/NYY would result in a loss if you went opposite of JM. Boston had swept the Yanks a second time. When the Sox went to NY for their 4 games series, the JM play was the Yanks and they won the (A) bet. If you went opposite, you would have to take the Red Sox. NY won 13-6, 2-0, 5-0,5-2. (no runline cover here)
Your reverse JM system would have 1 loss right out of the chute. so it seems like a waste of time as it wouldn't go undefeated.
Best of Luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by phatpherriola:
does anyone have a list of all the plays from the beginning of the mlb season till now? i wanted to back test and see if you went against jm in every series would you be undefeated. thanks for your help if anyone has it
Without going thru every single teams results I know the Bos/NYY would result in a loss if you went opposite of JM. Boston had swept the Yanks a second time. When the Sox went to NY for their 4 games series, the JM play was the Yanks and they won the (A) bet. If you went opposite, you would have to take the Red Sox. NY won 13-6, 2-0, 5-0,5-2. (no runline cover here)
Your reverse JM system would have 1 loss right out of the chute. so it seems like a waste of time as it wouldn't go undefeated.
chicano 1 I don't understand how you can celebrate the Seattle win when the Connecticut LOSS makes it impossible for anyone following the JM WNBA to be profitable. It was an entire seasons loss.
A $100 players lost $170 in game 1, $459 game 2 and $1,293 in game 3.....= 1,922 or -19 units. There aren't even 19 plays....and when the White Sox crash and burn today that will be another 15+ units ....or wait did JM send out an email claiming he took the Alternate run line yesterday or something......he did that in the DETROIT LOSS.
I don't have a problem with him ripping the systems from other people and selling them but he is such a scumbag liar. I, like others here have the emails from last year where he CLEARLY RECOMMENDED Sacramento as a play last year in NBA. The thing is what the hell is wrong with being like 75-1 in NBA??? So you lost 1...big fukn deal...be honest.
I have the emails from last summer too when we had either 6 or 7 losses in MLB totaling over -100 units and he has the balls to say he was 42-0??? That's a joke
I don't hear much about the hockey system he abandon in the first month after 60 units of losses.
bottom line is that with that the systems he stole and marketed work but with that money management method everyone who follows is one bad week from a ZERO bankroll.
0
chicano 1 I don't understand how you can celebrate the Seattle win when the Connecticut LOSS makes it impossible for anyone following the JM WNBA to be profitable. It was an entire seasons loss.
A $100 players lost $170 in game 1, $459 game 2 and $1,293 in game 3.....= 1,922 or -19 units. There aren't even 19 plays....and when the White Sox crash and burn today that will be another 15+ units ....or wait did JM send out an email claiming he took the Alternate run line yesterday or something......he did that in the DETROIT LOSS.
I don't have a problem with him ripping the systems from other people and selling them but he is such a scumbag liar. I, like others here have the emails from last year where he CLEARLY RECOMMENDED Sacramento as a play last year in NBA. The thing is what the hell is wrong with being like 75-1 in NBA??? So you lost 1...big fukn deal...be honest.
I have the emails from last summer too when we had either 6 or 7 losses in MLB totaling over -100 units and he has the balls to say he was 42-0??? That's a joke
I don't hear much about the hockey system he abandon in the first month after 60 units of losses.
bottom line is that with that the systems he stole and marketed work but with that money management method everyone who follows is one bad week from a ZERO bankroll.
Yeah its funny everytime Morrison loses Chicano still wins and blows his horn aloud so everyone can hear it. Guess we should judt follow Chicano's picks from now on...lol
0
Yeah its funny everytime Morrison loses Chicano still wins and blows his horn aloud so everyone can hear it. Guess we should judt follow Chicano's picks from now on...lol
So who is on CWS today? Luckily I sat out the A and B bets. This is a great example of how you need to some times consider that it is ok to not follow the system. I know there are some that follow it strictly, with the thinking that when you skip some games, you will forgo wins.
I see it as if I skip some games I will forgo bigger losses. I'd rather skip an A and/or B bet and miss a win, rather then lose an A and/or B bet and skip a C bet and miss a win.
That said, I am making an A wager on this C game and holding my nose doing it.
GL everyone
0
So who is on CWS today? Luckily I sat out the A and B bets. This is a great example of how you need to some times consider that it is ok to not follow the system. I know there are some that follow it strictly, with the thinking that when you skip some games, you will forgo wins.
I see it as if I skip some games I will forgo bigger losses. I'd rather skip an A and/or B bet and miss a win, rather then lose an A and/or B bet and skip a C bet and miss a win.
That said, I am making an A wager on this C game and holding my nose doing it.
Without going thru every single teams results I know the Bos/NYY would result in a loss if you went opposite of JM. Boston had swept the Yanks a second time. When the Sox went to NY for their 4 games series, the JM play was the Yanks and they won the (A) bet. If you went opposite, you would have to take the Red Sox. NY won 13-6, 2-0, 5-0,5-2. (no runline cover here)
Your reverse JM system would have 1 loss right out of the chute. so it seems like a waste of time as it wouldn't go undefeated.
Best of Luck
\
ok yes it wouldnt go undefeated but my thinking is you also wouldnt be laying nearly as much on the odds. therefore losses wont hurt nearly as bad
0
Quote Originally Posted by puppetm716:
Without going thru every single teams results I know the Bos/NYY would result in a loss if you went opposite of JM. Boston had swept the Yanks a second time. When the Sox went to NY for their 4 games series, the JM play was the Yanks and they won the (A) bet. If you went opposite, you would have to take the Red Sox. NY won 13-6, 2-0, 5-0,5-2. (no runline cover here)
Your reverse JM system would have 1 loss right out of the chute. so it seems like a waste of time as it wouldn't go undefeated.
Best of Luck
\
ok yes it wouldnt go undefeated but my thinking is you also wouldnt be laying nearly as much on the odds. therefore losses wont hurt nearly as bad
Soo happy i decided to call it a season last week and settle for what i already got. Learned the lesson from running my NHL system too long this spring. No MLB in september and no NHL in March for this fella...
0
Soo happy i decided to call it a season last week and settle for what i already got. Learned the lesson from running my NHL system too long this spring. No MLB in september and no NHL in March for this fella...
Im fuckin glad ws won this game. But Im a bit confused, JM rules are that you stop mlb betting at the end of August, he was very strict in saying that there is "NO" plays in September, but yet he gave this game out?? I wonder why? Does the RPI system make this change? Once again Im gald it won.
0
Im fuckin glad ws won this game. But Im a bit confused, JM rules are that you stop mlb betting at the end of August, he was very strict in saying that there is "NO" plays in September, but yet he gave this game out?? I wonder why? Does the RPI system make this change? Once again Im gald it won.
Am I ever glad I wasn't watching that game (CWS [C] bet). I was basically "all in" with my bankroll. I bet to win 100 on the [A] game. Then on the [B] bet I put in about $825 to make back my A loss plus trying to get the first $100 I was trying to win. Those two losses put me back about $1300 or so with the line at BetUS at -190 it took me about $2400 to get back. That bet left about $200 in my account if I lost the game today. All's well that ends well, I reckon. But I sure didn't like it.
0
Am I ever glad I wasn't watching that game (CWS [C] bet). I was basically "all in" with my bankroll. I bet to win 100 on the [A] game. Then on the [B] bet I put in about $825 to make back my A loss plus trying to get the first $100 I was trying to win. Those two losses put me back about $1300 or so with the line at BetUS at -190 it took me about $2400 to get back. That bet left about $200 in my account if I lost the game today. All's well that ends well, I reckon. But I sure didn't like it.
Im fuckin glad ws won this game. But Im a bit confused, JM rules are that you stop mlb betting at the end of August, he was very strict in saying that there is "NO" plays in September, but yet he gave this game out?? I wonder why? Does the RPI system make this change? Once again Im gald it won.
My best guess is that because the series began in August, JM called it a play. According to the stories by some long-time clients of JM, my guess is that if the White Sox lost today, JM would have claimed it was not an official play because the entire series was not played in August, therefore it would not have been an official loss. But since the C bet came through, he will chalk it up as an official win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by glen30:
Im fuckin glad ws won this game. But Im a bit confused, JM rules are that you stop mlb betting at the end of August, he was very strict in saying that there is "NO" plays in September, but yet he gave this game out?? I wonder why? Does the RPI system make this change? Once again Im gald it won.
My best guess is that because the series began in August, JM called it a play. According to the stories by some long-time clients of JM, my guess is that if the White Sox lost today, JM would have claimed it was not an official play because the entire series was not played in August, therefore it would not have been an official loss. But since the C bet came through, he will chalk it up as an official win.
Holy crap Jeff. If you were watching that on TV or on gamecast on the computer, you would have been sick to your stomach up until the 9th. Then you would have been STUNNED with euphoria at that comeback.
Wow.
Dude, you need to do some alterations on your money managament if I may suggest. That is way too much money to lay to win 100 bucks. Forget about your rollover, if that is your reasoning.
You should look at some variation of spreading out losses on future series, and betting similar amounts on all games within 1 series.
I know I was doing the same thing as you unitl I discovered Covers, and my eyes were opened wide.
I still tend to double up on B bets, but I NEVER lay the full C or anything close to it. If a strong series comes up (like stl. vs houston, or NYY vs Redsox) I double my normal wager for the A game.
Just a thought.
0
Holy crap Jeff. If you were watching that on TV or on gamecast on the computer, you would have been sick to your stomach up until the 9th. Then you would have been STUNNED with euphoria at that comeback.
Wow.
Dude, you need to do some alterations on your money managament if I may suggest. That is way too much money to lay to win 100 bucks. Forget about your rollover, if that is your reasoning.
You should look at some variation of spreading out losses on future series, and betting similar amounts on all games within 1 series.
I know I was doing the same thing as you unitl I discovered Covers, and my eyes were opened wide.
I still tend to double up on B bets, but I NEVER lay the full C or anything close to it. If a strong series comes up (like stl. vs houston, or NYY vs Redsox) I double my normal wager for the A game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.