All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB 4-game system

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17484
Posts: 126
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 279
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by sabs5000:

Hi nfl_huskers,

During these 7 game losses, were any of the chase teams ever Underdogs and lost by only 1 run so that the losing streak would have ended if the RL was played?


Great question. I definitely remembered quite a few underdogs in those 7-loss streaks, so I checked.  Looks like the RL would have ended every streak except those 2013 Rangers.


2016 Nationals
Lost by one run in games 4 and 5 as underdogs.

2015 Mets
Lost by one run in game 6 as an underdog.

2013 Cardinals
Lost by one run in game 5 as an underdog.

2013 Indians
Lost by one run in game 3 as an underdog.

2013 Dodgers
Lost by one run in games 3 and 4 as an underdog.

2013 Rangers
Texas was only an underdog in game 7, and lost by 4.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 50
Posted: #27
Excellent work. Maybe that's what we should focus on. If they're a favorite play the money line, and if they're a dog play the run line. It's just a thought.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #28
Indians on Game 1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 50
Posted: #29
I'm on board with you. Good luck today CKP22
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 50
Posted: #30
We're off to a good start (3-0), all game 1 winners. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 279
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by sabs5000:

Excellent work. Maybe that's what we should focus on. If they're a favorite play the money line, and if they're a dog play the run line. It's just a thought.


Changing those underdog ML bets to favorite RL bets will definitely stretch the timeline for a potential chase loss. Just a question of how much juice a person's bankroll can handle.

Great win today by Cleveland!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 50
Posted: #32
Changing those underdog ML bets to favorite RL bets will definitely stretch the timeline for a potential chase loss. Just a question of how much juice a person's bankroll can handle.

Absolutely.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #33
Monday - Cubs on Game 1 
Tuesday - Mets on Game 1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #34
Tuesday

Cubs on Game 2
Mets on Game 1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #35
Cubs clear on Game 2.

Wednesday: Mets on Game 2 and Dodgers on Game 1

YTD 4-0
Game 1 - 3 wins
Game 2 - 1 win
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 50
Posted: #36
We're off to a great start (6-0). Thanks for sharing.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #37
Mets and Dodgers clear.

Record: 6-0
Game 1 wins - 4
Game 2 wins - 2
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by sabs5000:

We're off to a great start (6-0). Thanks for sharing.

So far, so good. We'll see how this plays out.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #39
Game 1 on Sunday with Mets
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 328
Posted: #40
Is this system still ongoing?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 24
Posted: #41
Yes. Should be Mets again.  Hopefully they pull through today 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 328
Posted: #42
thx
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #43
Thursday: Mets on Game 3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 24
Posted: #44
Matt Harvey being a bum like usual 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 2838
Posted: #45
Great stuff.

Would this type of system work on fading the bottom feeders after a 3 game winning streak?  In other words....a reverse system?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #46
Probably going to lose here with Mets. Blame myself for that one. Should've went with Nationals this season as one of the teams instead.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 1
Posted: #47
[Quote: Originally Posted by CKP22] Probably going to lose here with Mets. Blame myself for that one. Should've went with Nationals this season as one of the teams instead. [/Quote

Should we go for Mets on Game 7 then? Or move forward with Washington?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #48
Mets clear on final try.
Record: 7-0
Game 1 wins - 4
Game 2 wins - 2
Game 4 wins - 1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #49
We have a play with a Game 1 on Cubs starting Monday night.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 998
Posted: #50
Cubs to Game 2 on second game of doubleheader.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.