6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
What are the odds of that in an 8 team parlay? The system has had much higher success in June than May, I will still continue to back track May -- After I post today's picks.
0
6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
What are the odds of that in an 8 team parlay? The system has had much higher success in June than May, I will still continue to back track May -- After I post today's picks.
6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
What are the odds of that in an 8 team parlay? The system has had much higher success in June than May, I will still continue to back track May -- After I post today's picks.
lol, its pretty ez picking all of the DOG winners after the day is over, bravo bravo
0
Quote Originally Posted by WiLdCaRd88:
6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
What are the odds of that in an 8 team parlay? The system has had much higher success in June than May, I will still continue to back track May -- After I post today's picks.
lol, its pretty ez picking all of the DOG winners after the day is over, bravo bravo
I think what the guy was saying is that people are all here to make money, and if you would post what you're working on, others can help you refine it since none of us has all of the answers. I'm following your plays to see the success rate and hope you nail 'em all, but it would be nice to help you see if you're on to something or if it's a wild lucky streak.
0
Wildcard,
I think what the guy was saying is that people are all here to make money, and if you would post what you're working on, others can help you refine it since none of us has all of the answers. I'm following your plays to see the success rate and hope you nail 'em all, but it would be nice to help you see if you're on to something or if it's a wild lucky streak.
Word. I understand...Trying to fine tune it myself ATM. As far as it going 8-0 yesterday, thats the first time it was ever 100% and some days there are only 2-5 plays. Almost every dog won last night, I was just showing those that fell into the system.... I'm still working at it and thank you. Not every day is a positive day though, obviously.
0
Word. I understand...Trying to fine tune it myself ATM. As far as it going 8-0 yesterday, thats the first time it was ever 100% and some days there are only 2-5 plays. Almost every dog won last night, I was just showing those that fell into the system.... I'm still working at it and thank you. Not every day is a positive day though, obviously.
6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
6/28 -- I know I wasn't here to post -- was the best day the system has ever had -- go figure -- believe it or not. System Plays 6/28:
San Francisco Giants (+160) $100:$160 Cincinnati Reds (+150) $100:$150 Philadelphia Phillies (+140) $100:$140 Washington Nationals (+122) $100:$122 Chicago White Sox (+102) $100:$102 Minnesota Twins (+114) $100:$114 Los Angeles Angels (+140) $100:$140 San Diego Padres (+136) $100:$136 TOTAL: (8-0) (+$1,064)
damn....that parlay for $100 would have paid 84694.16!!!
10 bucks would have been 8469.42
nice....
whats the system?
don't listen to these other guys....i track things all the time and sometimes things work and pan out and sometimes they don;t....
more importantly than just this season, you need to go and back track for prior seasons....
i can't even tell you the all the systems i've tracked....hours and hours going through old boxscores and past seasons results for the MLB, NBA and NFL for years.....
some of my tracking in the NFL i have dated back from the early/mid 90's through today......most don't pan out but i have a few that have....
0
damn....that parlay for $100 would have paid 84694.16!!!
10 bucks would have been 8469.42
nice....
whats the system?
don't listen to these other guys....i track things all the time and sometimes things work and pan out and sometimes they don;t....
more importantly than just this season, you need to go and back track for prior seasons....
i can't even tell you the all the systems i've tracked....hours and hours going through old boxscores and past seasons results for the MLB, NBA and NFL for years.....
some of my tracking in the NFL i have dated back from the early/mid 90's through today......most don't pan out but i have a few that have....
damn....that parlay for $100 would have paid 84694.16!!!
10 bucks would have been 8469.42
nice....
whats the system?
don't listen to these other guys....i track things all the time and sometimes things work and pan out and sometimes they don;t....
more importantly than just this season, you need to go and back track for prior seasons....
i can't even tell you the all the systems i've tracked....hours and hours going through old boxscores and past seasons results for the MLB, NBA and NFL for years.....
some of my tracking in the NFL i have dated back from the early/mid 90's through today......most don't pan out but i have a few that have....
What do you mean "don't listen to these other guys"? We all have the same goal. Instead of going through old box scores like you say that you do, why not post your idea so someone can say "hey, I tried that, but it went under 50% over a four year period." Or maybe someone could add little tidbits, like "that trend doesn't hold up with division rivals." If you want to try systems, fine, but why post your plays without the system along with it? Either you're posting it for other people to see or you're not....can't have it both ways.
0
Quote Originally Posted by powerade:
damn....that parlay for $100 would have paid 84694.16!!!
10 bucks would have been 8469.42
nice....
whats the system?
don't listen to these other guys....i track things all the time and sometimes things work and pan out and sometimes they don;t....
more importantly than just this season, you need to go and back track for prior seasons....
i can't even tell you the all the systems i've tracked....hours and hours going through old boxscores and past seasons results for the MLB, NBA and NFL for years.....
some of my tracking in the NFL i have dated back from the early/mid 90's through today......most don't pan out but i have a few that have....
What do you mean "don't listen to these other guys"? We all have the same goal. Instead of going through old box scores like you say that you do, why not post your idea so someone can say "hey, I tried that, but it went under 50% over a four year period." Or maybe someone could add little tidbits, like "that trend doesn't hold up with division rivals." If you want to try systems, fine, but why post your plays without the system along with it? Either you're posting it for other people to see or you're not....can't have it both ways.
Ok. I've finished the month of May -- May Record: (86-97) (+$1,650) W/L Days: 18:13 June Record: (93-77) (+$4,854) W/L Days: 18:9 TOTAL: (179-174)(+$6,504) W/L Days: 36:22 Did end up hitting 50%+.... Now the real backtracking -- Previous seasons from May-End of season. This is going to take a while...
0
Ok. I've finished the month of May -- May Record: (86-97) (+$1,650) W/L Days: 18:13 June Record: (93-77) (+$4,854) W/L Days: 18:9 TOTAL: (179-174)(+$6,504) W/L Days: 36:22 Did end up hitting 50%+.... Now the real backtracking -- Previous seasons from May-End of season. This is going to take a while...
What do you mean "don't listen to these other guys"? We all have the same goal. Instead of going through old box scores like you say that you do, why not post your idea so someone can say "hey, I tried that, but it went under 50% over a four year period." Or maybe someone could add little tidbits, like "that trend doesn't hold up with division rivals." If you want to try systems, fine, but why post your plays without the system along with it? Either you're posting it for other people to see or you're not....can't have it both ways.
makes sense, no debate, show and tell...
0
Quote Originally Posted by coachnip13:
What do you mean "don't listen to these other guys"? We all have the same goal. Instead of going through old box scores like you say that you do, why not post your idea so someone can say "hey, I tried that, but it went under 50% over a four year period." Or maybe someone could add little tidbits, like "that trend doesn't hold up with division rivals." If you want to try systems, fine, but why post your plays without the system along with it? Either you're posting it for other people to see or you're not....can't have it both ways.
are you cappin' these games, or just playing "dogs" at random?
what your doing doesn't make any sense; can you explain the form your iniciating? Dogs hit 44% over the past 8 seasons, it's what particular dog that you 'capp' of those 44%, playing all dogs, and thinking your going to come out on top, based on the 'value' of the play, does not equate to an advantage in units, do your math, stats don't lie, an opinion is deemed worthless when attaching it to sports handicapping where wagering is involved, baseball is about stats, not whims, or theory..It is your option to be evasive with 'your' thread, I am sure you have your reasons; and as you stated, "I could care less what anyone thinks" fine, you also have that option of commentary, but keep in mind; it isolates you from receiving any insight, or knowledge from added brainpower attached to your concept, there are some extremely intellegent handicappers in Systems&Strategies with more resources, and data bases than bayer has aspirins..Take advantage of the reasearch skills available, or you'll 'fizzle'..I wish you the best of success in your work, and hope it puts you in a prosperous position...my thoughts on your thread, but of course.."you could care less" best regards, SN
0
are you cappin' these games, or just playing "dogs" at random?
what your doing doesn't make any sense; can you explain the form your iniciating? Dogs hit 44% over the past 8 seasons, it's what particular dog that you 'capp' of those 44%, playing all dogs, and thinking your going to come out on top, based on the 'value' of the play, does not equate to an advantage in units, do your math, stats don't lie, an opinion is deemed worthless when attaching it to sports handicapping where wagering is involved, baseball is about stats, not whims, or theory..It is your option to be evasive with 'your' thread, I am sure you have your reasons; and as you stated, "I could care less what anyone thinks" fine, you also have that option of commentary, but keep in mind; it isolates you from receiving any insight, or knowledge from added brainpower attached to your concept, there are some extremely intellegent handicappers in Systems&Strategies with more resources, and data bases than bayer has aspirins..Take advantage of the reasearch skills available, or you'll 'fizzle'..I wish you the best of success in your work, and hope it puts you in a prosperous position...my thoughts on your thread, but of course.."you could care less" best regards, SN
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
