Back to my question on 6/28/12. CLE @ BAL had an rpi difference of 45. BAL had won 4 of their last 10. DET @ TB had an rpi difference of 42. TB had won 4 of their last 10. CHW @ NYY had an rpi difference of 39. At this point the system is purely a mechanical system. Once you start putting things in like "best player is out", "team era is too high", "bad team is hot", "team doesn't do well out west", etc. the system is no longer mechanical. I just go by the rpi difference rule and don't play the first month of the season. I'm doing fine this year and it takes me five minutes to figure out the plays. This is baseball and anything can happen. Remember, the first rule of the system is the good teams beat the bad teams. So I played BAL and TB and they both won their "B" games. I did not play NYY because it did not meet the rpi minimum. That being said, I hope you guys win the NYY "C" game because win is what we all want each other to do regardless of the discussions we have. If I did something wrong, I can't find it and I've been dead on when I match my picks with what you put on this forum up until now.
Back to my question on 6/28/12. CLE @ BAL had an rpi difference of 45. BAL had won 4 of their last 10. DET @ TB had an rpi difference of 42. TB had won 4 of their last 10. CHW @ NYY had an rpi difference of 39. At this point the system is purely a mechanical system. Once you start putting things in like "best player is out", "team era is too high", "bad team is hot", "team doesn't do well out west", etc. the system is no longer mechanical. I just go by the rpi difference rule and don't play the first month of the season. I'm doing fine this year and it takes me five minutes to figure out the plays. This is baseball and anything can happen. Remember, the first rule of the system is the good teams beat the bad teams. So I played BAL and TB and they both won their "B" games. I did not play NYY because it did not meet the rpi minimum. That being said, I hope you guys win the NYY "C" game because win is what we all want each other to do regardless of the discussions we have. If I did something wrong, I can't find it and I've been dead on when I match my picks with what you put on this forum up until now.
Back to my question on 6/28/12. CLE @ BAL had an rpi difference of 45. BAL had won 4 of their last 10. DET @ TB had an rpi difference of 42. TB had won 4 of their last 10. CHW @ NYY had an rpi difference of 39. At this point the system is purely a mechanical system. Once you start putting things in like "best player is out", "team era is too high", "bad team is hot", "team doesn't do well out west", etc. the system is no longer mechanical. I just go by the rpi difference rule and don't play the first month of the season. I'm doing fine this year and it takes me five minutes to figure out the plays. This is baseball and anything can happen. Remember, the first rule of the system is the good teams beat the bad teams. So I played BAL and TB and they both won their "B" games. I did not play NYY because it did not meet the rpi minimum. That being said, I hope you guys win the NYY "C" game because win is what we all want each other to do regardless of the discussions we have. If I did something wrong, I can't find it and I've been dead on when I match my picks with what you put on this forum up until now.
I double checked that game (cle/bal) RP-RT, I didn't see those numbers (RPI difference) you are talking about. Maybe I missed it. You may be right...fyi.
As far as the other filters, well, I don't generally use them either. I normally just go with what the RPI says. Good points by the way.
Back to my question on 6/28/12. CLE @ BAL had an rpi difference of 45. BAL had won 4 of their last 10. DET @ TB had an rpi difference of 42. TB had won 4 of their last 10. CHW @ NYY had an rpi difference of 39. At this point the system is purely a mechanical system. Once you start putting things in like "best player is out", "team era is too high", "bad team is hot", "team doesn't do well out west", etc. the system is no longer mechanical. I just go by the rpi difference rule and don't play the first month of the season. I'm doing fine this year and it takes me five minutes to figure out the plays. This is baseball and anything can happen. Remember, the first rule of the system is the good teams beat the bad teams. So I played BAL and TB and they both won their "B" games. I did not play NYY because it did not meet the rpi minimum. That being said, I hope you guys win the NYY "C" game because win is what we all want each other to do regardless of the discussions we have. If I did something wrong, I can't find it and I've been dead on when I match my picks with what you put on this forum up until now.
I double checked that game (cle/bal) RP-RT, I didn't see those numbers (RPI difference) you are talking about. Maybe I missed it. You may be right...fyi.
As far as the other filters, well, I don't generally use them either. I normally just go with what the RPI says. Good points by the way.
bettor2win, this is what I downloaded from ESPN on 6/26/12. does it maech what you used?
1 | New York Yankees | 0.547 |
2 | Baltimore Orioles | 0.544 |
3 | Tampa Bay Rays | 0.536 |
4 | Washington Nationals | 0.53 |
5 | Texas Rangers | 0.525 |
6 | Cincinnati Reds | 0.522 |
7 | Toronto Blue Jays | 0.521 |
8 | Atlanta Braves | 0.517 |
9 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.511 |
10 | Boston Red Sox | 0.51 |
11 | New York Mets | 0.51 |
12 | Los Angeles Angels | 0.509 |
13 | Chicago White Sox | 0.508 |
14 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 0.506 |
15 | Cleveland Indians | 0.499 |
16 | Miami Marlins | 0.498 |
17 | San Francisco Giants | 0.495 |
18 | Kansas City Royals | 0.494 |
19 | Detroit Tigers | 0.494 |
20 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 0.492 |
21 | Oakland Athletics | 0.491 |
22 | Seattle Mariners | 0.489 |
23 | St. Louis Cardinals | 0.489 |
24 | Philadelphia Phillies | 0.481 |
25 | Houston Astros | 0.479 |
26 | Minnesota Twins | 0.473 |
27 | Milwaukee Brewers | 0.466 |
28 | Colorado Rockies | 0.466 |
29 | San Diego Padres | 0.454 |
30 | Chicago Cubs | 0.447 |
bettor2win, this is what I downloaded from ESPN on 6/26/12. does it maech what you used?
1 | New York Yankees | 0.547 |
2 | Baltimore Orioles | 0.544 |
3 | Tampa Bay Rays | 0.536 |
4 | Washington Nationals | 0.53 |
5 | Texas Rangers | 0.525 |
6 | Cincinnati Reds | 0.522 |
7 | Toronto Blue Jays | 0.521 |
8 | Atlanta Braves | 0.517 |
9 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.511 |
10 | Boston Red Sox | 0.51 |
11 | New York Mets | 0.51 |
12 | Los Angeles Angels | 0.509 |
13 | Chicago White Sox | 0.508 |
14 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 0.506 |
15 | Cleveland Indians | 0.499 |
16 | Miami Marlins | 0.498 |
17 | San Francisco Giants | 0.495 |
18 | Kansas City Royals | 0.494 |
19 | Detroit Tigers | 0.494 |
20 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 0.492 |
21 | Oakland Athletics | 0.491 |
22 | Seattle Mariners | 0.489 |
23 | St. Louis Cardinals | 0.489 |
24 | Philadelphia Phillies | 0.481 |
25 | Houston Astros | 0.479 |
26 | Minnesota Twins | 0.473 |
27 | Milwaukee Brewers | 0.466 |
28 | Colorado Rockies | 0.466 |
29 | San Diego Padres | 0.454 |
30 | Chicago Cubs | 0.447 |
Yes it is what I have. But on 6/26, I thought I doublechecked that even with the degen and canis spreadsheets and it showed BAL/CLE at a 39 difference. Maybe it's this new vegetarian diet I'm on.
Yes it is what I have. But on 6/26, I thought I doublechecked that even with the degen and canis spreadsheets and it showed BAL/CLE at a 39 difference. Maybe it's this new vegetarian diet I'm on.
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. This is when this system really got going last year. Maybe someone could light a FIRECRACKER under the RPI's A$$ and we could win some "A" games. The plays look look like, potentially:
NORTH EASTERN BIRDS
SNAKES
ONE EYED BANDITS
TOMAHAWKS
I'm trying something new. See if Karma comes our way.
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. This is when this system really got going last year. Maybe someone could light a FIRECRACKER under the RPI's A$$ and we could win some "A" games. The plays look look like, potentially:
NORTH EASTERN BIRDS
SNAKES
ONE EYED BANDITS
TOMAHAWKS
I'm trying something new. See if Karma comes our way.
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. The plays look look like, potentially:
NORTH EASTERN BIRDS
SNAKES
ONE EYED BANDITS
TOMAHAWKS
I'm in for 3.5 units a piece.
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. The plays look look like, potentially:
NORTH EASTERN BIRDS
SNAKES
ONE EYED BANDITS
TOMAHAWKS
I'm in for 3.5 units a piece.
Not sure what you are trying to do, but here are the rpi and stats as they existed the morning of 06/28/12.
Not sure what you are trying to do, but here are the rpi and stats as they existed the morning of 06/28/12.
ATL is a go.
PIT is a go using the 40-42 range for a home team RPI differential. (the differential is at 40 for this game)
ATL is a go.
PIT is a go using the 40-42 range for a home team RPI differential. (the differential is at 40 for this game)
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. This is when this system really got going last year.
We have 4 potential plays for tomorrow heading into the 4th of July week. This is when this system really got going last year.
bettor2win
Okay, I must have screwed up somewhere and it was too late for me to go back and get the 6/28/12 numbers again from ESPN to be sure I had the correct set. It's all good. Thanks for the help. Thanks again for the system. Now I'm golden in MLB and NCAAB. I have to continue working on NFL and NBA though.
bettor2win
Okay, I must have screwed up somewhere and it was too late for me to go back and get the 6/28/12 numbers again from ESPN to be sure I had the correct set. It's all good. Thanks for the help. Thanks again for the system. Now I'm golden in MLB and NCAAB. I have to continue working on NFL and NBA though.
IN 3720 OUT 2390 NET 1320 give or take
Chasing the DOG
IN 2250 OUT 1900 NET 350
havent seen a recap for June. looks like it was a risky month but still profitable. Chasing the DOG was a theory I back checked after a DREADFUL MAY which netted over 2000 for the month of MAY vs. chasing the favorite which netted next to nothing.
IN 3720 OUT 2390 NET 1320 give or take
Chasing the DOG
IN 2250 OUT 1900 NET 350
havent seen a recap for June. looks like it was a risky month but still profitable. Chasing the DOG was a theory I back checked after a DREADFUL MAY which netted over 2000 for the month of MAY vs. chasing the favorite which netted next to nothing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.