All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB Super Systems

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 40083
Posts: 246
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #176

Yesterday's Plays

System #1 – Dominant Team Playing Better Now

WAS (A) - WIN

System #4 – Dominant Team Over Last 3 Years

ARI (A) - LOSS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #177

Today's Plays

System #1 – Dominant Team Playing Better Now

NYY (A)

CIN (A)

System #5 – Revenge Series

TEX (A)

 

Note: We are laying off the 'B' game for ARI - due to the pitching matchup - hopefully - we can pick it up again for the C game

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #178

Some color commentary on the spreadsheet

SF - is a no play since it conflicts with a LAD pick for system #5 - we are off

SDG - pitching matchup is not in our favor - so we are off

TEX - only small difference in pitching matchup (Darvish vs Sale) - both are top 25 pitchers - so we will play this

WAS - we won out A game - so we are off the series

ARI - we have to lay off of our B game on ARI due to the pitching matchup - hopefully we can pick it up on a C game

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #179

Yesterday's Plays

System #1 – Dominant Team Playing Better Now

NYY (A) - WON

CIN (A) - WON

System #5 – Revenge Series

TEX (A) - LOSS

 

I guess we should have played ARI and layed off TEX - oh well the new filters are here to mitgate risk.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #180

Today's Plays

System #3 – Dominant Home Team

SF (A)

System #4 – Dominant Team Over Last 3 Years

ARI (B)

System #5 – Revenge Series

TEX (B)

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 326
Posted: #181
I like the SF match-up today. I've been holding off on Texas till they can come out of their slump. ARI dose have at least a situational advantage over the NYM , but it's tough to wager against somebodys top pitcher.  GL   Keep up the good work.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #182

Yesterday's Plays

System #3 – Dominant Home Team

SF (A) - LOSS

System #4 – Dominant Team Over Last 3 Years

ARI (B) - WIN

System #5 – Revenge Series

TEX (B) - LOSS

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #183

Today's Plays

System #3 – Dominant Home Team

SF (B)

 

No play on TEX - CWS have the pitching edge
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 592
Posted: #184
Quote Originally Posted by DegenGamble:

No play on TEX - CWS have the pitching edge


Didn't even see this.  Just saw yesterday that TEX was going to a C game and bet 25% of my BR on it....safe to say I'm PRETTY happy right about now
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #185

Yesterday's Plays

System #3 – Dominant Home Team

SF (B) - LOSS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #186

Tough series - we won 4 series and lost 2 series - for a loss of -6 units.

 

Since tracking started on 7/2

Record: 39-10

Units: +10.2 units

 

We would have avoided the TEX loss if we followed the system to the letter - and help off game "A" even with the ever so slight pitching disadvantage.  So we would have came out profitable for this series.

 


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #187

Today's Plays

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

LAD (A)

SF (A)

CWS (A)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #188

Color Commentary:

ATL, CIN, TEX - are listed on the spreadsheet but does not have a favorable pitching matchup.  So we will lay off game 1 and see if they stay a play in game 2.

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 592
Posted: #189
Did TEX for System 5 show up in your spreadsheet?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 592
Posted: #190
Actually, I no longer question it.  I assume it did, and I believe you have the parameters right.  I find the plays they record on the site have many mistakes in them.  CHC should have never been a play for system #5 bc the one parameter of this system is that the team needs to have a winning percentage over .470....CHC clearly doesn't have that, yet they were listed as a 5 play on the site.  So assuming TEX did show up (didn't look just saw your post) you clearly have the parameters in the s/s correct.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #191
Quote Originally Posted by CannedGoods:

Actually, I no longer question it.  I assume it did, and I believe you have the parameters right.  I find the plays they record on the site have many mistakes in them.  CHC should have never been a play for system #5 bc the one parameter of this system is that the team needs to have a winning percentage over .470....CHC clearly doesn't have that, yet they were listed as a 5 play on the site.  So assuming TEX did show up (didn't look just saw your post) you clearly have the parameters in the s/s correct.


CG - just for the record, the under .470 filter is not documented on the website or the PDF - it's one we added to avoid losses.  However, he did email me that their are some filters he added that are not documented on the website or the PDF - so that is probably why some of the plays on the website don't match up to the spreadsheet - I think it's up to us to figure out the correct filters to use.  I think using a filter not to play a team under .470 is a good one though - we will mitigate risk.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #192

Yesterday's Plays

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

LAD (A) - LOSS

SF (A) - LOSS

CWS (A) - LOSS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #193

Today's Plays

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

LAD (B)

SF (B)

CWS (B)

CIN (A)

WAS (A)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #194
Color Commentary:

OAK - popped up today on the spreadsheet but won yesterday - so it's a no play.

ATL - could have been a play if they lost yesterday and had a favorable pitching matchup - but we are off

CIN - is listed under systems 1,3 and 6

BOS - is listed but is not a play - bad pitching matchup and win yesterdday

MIL - is listed but won yesterday (you're option if you want to do a 1 time flat bet - only because they playign the god awful stro's)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #195

Yesterday's Plays

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

LAD (B) - LOSS

SF (B) - WIN

CWS (B) - WIN

CIN (A) - WIN

WAS (A) - LOSS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #196

Sorry about the late post - I was not by a PC all day - but you should know the plays from the spreadsheet

Today's Plays

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

WAS (B)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #197
Can someone post the plays if there are any? Thanks
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #198

Series Result: 4-1 Units: +.3 units

Not a great series - the LAD loss ate up all the profits.  Have a better feeling about the next series - this mini-slump should turn around.

 

Since tracking started on 7/2

Record: 43-11

Units: +10.5 units

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #199

Today's Plays

System #1 – Dominant Team Playing Better Now

WAS (A)

ATL (A)

System #6 – RPI Hybrid

TEX (A)

 

Note: WAS & ATL are listed in Systems 1 & 6
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #200
Don't forget WAS is a double header - so if they lose the first game today - you take the 7:30 game as game B
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.