All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB system releases...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 238599
Posts: 2245
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 171
Posted: #1701
SN,
 
Did you have any issues sending the PM
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 241
Posted: #1702
Just looked at MLB rule book. Ball shall  be ruled dead when ball falls in fair territory and bounces out of the field of play, or when ball is unplayable due to design of park or fence. The ball landing in the bullpen gear of bosox should not have been ruled dead. Tampa and those of us on Tampa got shafted! Hopefully a two-run walk-off will save us.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 241
Posted: #1703
Pardon me, it was the Rays bullpen.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 14
Posted: #1704
Man this hurts guys....  This is like the worst night in the history of sports wagering.. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 241
Posted: #1705
Thank you  Longoria!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2005
Posts: 351
Posted: #1706
As a Yankees fan, I say you should buy Longoria a drink next time you see him. That's a rare extra inning win on the RL.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 14
Posted: #1707
ok a 2-8 day so I'm sure the two wins he had 55 units each on, and only 2 units each on the 8 losses... so a solid day regardless

There wouldn't be this question if he just indicated how many units he had on them before the game. Oh but that's too much to ask.

It's better to claim you are up a billion units by announcing how many units you had on each FOLLOWING the game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1708
Quote Originally Posted by jasonr:

ok a 2-8 day so I'm sure the two wins he had 55 units each on, and only 2 units each on the 8 losses... so a solid day regardless

There wouldn't be this question if he just indicated how many units he had on them before the game. Oh but that's too much to ask.

It's better to claim you are up a billion units by announcing how many units you had on each FOLLOWING the game.


Give it a rest with the whining.
I don't know how many units you're playing per game but if you followed even the basic unit attachment mentioned earlier in this thread you should be up at least 200 units from Jun onwards.

I estimate around a 20 unit loss today. Maybe slightly more/less.
And guess what, he's had 20 unit loss before and that hasn't stopped him from ending up with one profitable month after the other.

Besides, you should only be complaining about today if SN forced you to tail him. It was your decision.




On another note,
SN - is there something you found in your calculations that gave the leans for the under plays in the first five innings. From past (painful) experiences, I've found the 1st half under bets to have a very high risk to reward ratio.
For the most part, you sometimes only get half the full game total but 1 whole extra inning to bet with.
For eg: Game total 8 (to be played over 18 half innings or 17 if game goes for 8.5 only)
Half total 4 (to be played over 10 half innings)
 
For the 1st half over, this works in your favor - but not for the under as the teams have more chances to score.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1709
[Quote: Originally Posted by sports_Network]
MLB system releases Tuesday 08/04/09 Base_Runs formula...
 
Tigers+105 RL
Rays+188 RL
Angels+132 RL
Rangers+140 RL
Braves+110 RL
Pirates+158 RL
 
MIL/LAD+110  UNDER 4  5innings
SF/HOU+112  UNDER 4.5  5innings
StL/NYM+105  UNDER 4  5innings
COL/PHI+115  UNDER 5  5innings
 
 
tenPACformulated
projected ratio: 7/10  70%
 
SN

FINAL RESULTS

2-8

units:-22.16

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1710
snyder9, I was capitalizing on a 4-0 run that was produced from a strong read in that direction, it fizzled last night..2-8, that's baseball..no excuses, no explanations..it's not over till it's over!
best regards
SN
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 136
Posted: #1711
Well I know you had a rough day SN. But I thank you for throwing out the Braves pick. It pretty much solidified my position on taking their RL. Thank you from this "bottom feeder".
 
Just curious as to why you threw ApacheM the Pirates pick and not the Braves when you said that was your biggest lean.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1712
Quote Originally Posted by kbit:

Well I know you had a rough day SN. But I thank you for throwing out the Braves pick. It pretty much solidified my position on taking their RL. Thank you from this "bottom feeder".
 
Just curious as to why you threw ApacheM the Pirates pick and not the Braves when you said that was your biggest lean.

your welcome, regarding the Braves RL win.. congratulations on your play as well...The Pirates were a pure value play, It just wasn't thier time (inferior teams are capped for value, and value alone)   Your lengthy participation has seen many different changes in your approach, and understanding of concept, and application to insight. Bottomfeeder is a 'term' not a degrading label. I personally don't identify you as one(bottomfeeder) your commentary has always been that of respect, but at times becomes abstract with opinion, other than having stats to back your statements..please continue with your prosperity, stay positive, what goes around, comes around...

watch the R&R on this one, benificial to yourself....

SN

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1713
swamppdonkey77
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1714
Quote Originally Posted by RaleighDevil:

As a Yankees fan, I say you should buy Longoria a drink next time you see him. That's a rare extra inning win on the RL.

let's say very rare..but as you wholeheartely know, that's baseball, pure and simple.. "it's not over til' it's over" 

best to you always

SN

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1715
Magic_Shark  no, not at all 
 
SN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1716
 
 
                                         Wed, August 5th, 2009
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 691
Posted: #1717
jasonr...Unit attachment isn't  that difficult for each individual handicapper. - if you would read the thread, it's all in there. Its takes time, and the correct application to understand.  I like the fact SN does not post his units.  If you  have an understanding of the ideas presented here you would already know the unit attachment...and for those that are 'bottomfeeders", it really upsets them. 

I bet there have been 50 posts through tthe entire thread asking "Why doesn't SN attach units?"  For those that have the understanding, the knowledge, the patience to learn, it's all there.

Historical Results:

Fri   7/24    +14.40
Sat  7/25    +13.84
Sun 7/26     -11.60
Mon 7/27    +12.20
Tues7/28    +18.42
Wed7/29     +2.38
Thurs7/30    +36.38
Fri    7/31    +20.52
Sat 8/1         +8.84
Sun 8/2       +15.45
Mon 8/3       + 3.85
Tues           -22.16

That is +112.52 Units in the last 12 days...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1718
MLB system releases Wed, August 5th, 2009 Base_Runs formula
 
Mets+134 ML
Astros-121 ML
Phillies-152 ML
RedSox+119 ML
Rangers+124 ML
 
Tigers+112 RL
 
ATL/SD+110  UNDER 4  5innings
FLA/WAS+112  UNDER 4.5  5innings
 
 
eightPACformulated  (R&R initiated, and in effect)*
projected ratio: 6/8  75%
 
 
SN
 
*those sitting at the same table, please take the R&R formula in reference; with attachment to todays card.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1719
MME stats don't lie, thx for your most appreciative commentary
 
 
SN
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #1720
Any pod for today?
 
Thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 87
Posted: #1721
Quote Originally Posted by MeMyselfandEye:

jasonr...Unit attachment isn't  that difficult for each individual handicapper. - if you would read the thread, it's all in there. Its takes time, and the correct application to understand.  I like the fact SN does not post his units.  If you  have an understanding of the ideas presented here you would already know the unit attachment...and for those that are 'bottomfeeders", it really upsets them. 

I bet there have been 50 posts through tthe entire thread asking "Why doesn't SN attach units?"  For those that have the understanding, the knowledge, the patience to learn, it's all there.

Historical Results:

Fri   7/24    +14.40
Sat  7/25    +13.84
Sun 7/26     -11.60
Mon 7/27    +12.20
Tues7/28    +18.42
Wed7/29     +2.38
Thurs7/30    +36.38
Fri    7/31    +20.52
Sat 8/1         +8.84
Sun 8/2       +15.45
Mon 8/3       + 3.85
Tues           -22.16

That is +112.52 Units in the last 12 days...


The sabermetrics method, especially as used through RL plays, is unquestionably  valid and valuable.  And I backtracked the RL plays earlier -at 8 units a piece- for a large profit.

However, if you can explain the bet sizing formula that has more recently been included, please do.  If, on the other hand, you can't explain how this formula works, then it is not, as you say, 'all there'. 

What does each number in that formula stand for, and how does it apply to each bet for that day?

Until that is made abundantly clear, I'm not quite ready to assume that sabermetrics expertise also translates into bet sizing expertise. 

Respectfully,


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1722
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

 
  Saturday, 01/08/09
 [+715/-785 (-70) [143 ^5^ 157 (14)] +47.6% / -52.3% (5.2)]
 
  Sunday, 02/08/09
 [+883/-250 (+533) [294.1 ^3^ 89.1 (205)] +76.7% / -23.2% (53.2)] 
 
Attached to FINAL RESULTS in advance....PACsymbol 'read' formula.
 
 
SN
 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1723
MME  I would assume the above #1772  is the formula of explanation? no problem, please PM with formula's, attached for discussion... best for you always
 
SN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1724
[Quote: Originally Posted by moneylog]
Any pod for today?
 
Thanks

  Rangers+124 ML

 

 

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1725
DarkHorse21,  I would assume the above #1772  is the formula of explanation? no problem, please PM with formula's, attached for discussion... best for you always
 
SN
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.