Feel free to use the acronym anytime I make a bad post (like above) or a bad pick. 
I'm not use to a site that doesn't allow post edits in the forums, although I completely understand why it's done here.
Yea, this seems a little weird, but couldn't there be a system here? Systems 1 and 2 will conflict for winning streak teams on Game B if there's a win for Game A. So what about a chase starting with Game C hoping for the opposite result of Game B?
I don't have access to a database (or know how to use one), but I'm pretty certain might be a bad system. On the System 1 continuation it probably has a 50-50 or so chance of winning if it makes it to Game C, and there's little connection to hitting on Games D & E (Otherwise, System 1 would be worth going to more than 3 games). System 2 on the other hand points to good fortune, since it's nearly undefeated, but again, it could strike well on the first game more often than the last.
I am pretty much theorycrafting that we should double down on System 2 if Game B is a NOLA ATS win, but I have no data to back it up 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
