update..thanks for pointing out the games i missed
adding
Angels (Oakland lose) -182 1.82u to win 1u
Detroit (KC lose) -103 1.03u to win 1u
Boston should be to win 1.21u , i already have the play in as above to win 2.21u .,,but to properly track the system i will count is as 1.82u to win 1.21u
0
update..thanks for pointing out the games i missed
adding
Angels (Oakland lose) -182 1.82u to win 1u
Detroit (KC lose) -103 1.03u to win 1u
Boston should be to win 1.21u , i already have the play in as above to win 2.21u .,,but to properly track the system i will count is as 1.82u to win 1.21u
Just double checked the plays and it seems Texas is a play as well, they have won 5 in a row, so there is another conflict with them and Boston. Also, what have the numbers been in the past in cases where a play has gone pasta third game which shifts the type of play?
0
Just double checked the plays and it seems Texas is a play as well, they have won 5 in a row, so there is another conflict with them and Boston. Also, what have the numbers been in the past in cases where a play has gone pasta third game which shifts the type of play?
From what I can see this year this has happened 4 times with split results, 2 of the times the 4th game hit on the original play and 2 of the times the play went to the first game for the new streak. Just curious if you have info on this, I know you have been switching to the other side, but why not play the original play and if it wins on what would be the 4th game, then you would have a second play on the second streak.
0
From what I can see this year this has happened 4 times with split results, 2 of the times the 4th game hit on the original play and 2 of the times the play went to the first game for the new streak. Just curious if you have info on this, I know you have been switching to the other side, but why not play the original play and if it wins on what would be the 4th game, then you would have a second play on the second streak.
In the case of this conflict Boston is to win 2.82, Texas is to win 1 ..therefore my actual bet is boston to win 1.82 .. on my lines however, i will treat each as if they were bet as seperate plays..didnt really look into chasing past 3..
0
Hey Jayray
In the case of this conflict Boston is to win 2.82, Texas is to win 1 ..therefore my actual bet is boston to win 1.82 .. on my lines however, i will treat each as if they were bet as seperate plays..didnt really look into chasing past 3..
Maybe I missed something, but I peg Wednesday's loss at -19.91 units, not -10.94.
Now come on, it was a bad night, but not that bad ! , i do not have my spreadsheet here at work, but I will double check when i get home, just quickly looking at the results, it woulsnot be -19.91..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Snappa:
Maybe I missed something, but I peg Wednesday's loss at -19.91 units, not -10.94.
Now come on, it was a bad night, but not that bad ! , i do not have my spreadsheet here at work, but I will double check when i get home, just quickly looking at the results, it woulsnot be -19.91..
DET W +1.00 ________________ -19.91 I still come up with the same answer. Maybe I'm not understanding your system. My results are a little different, due to rounding, but my loss totaled 18.96U. Better luck today.
0
BOS L -2.26
MIA W +1.00
LAD L -1.4 -2.48
WAS L -5.94
BAL L -4.05
STL W +1.00
CLE L -2.04
LAA L -4.74
DET W +1.00 ________________ -19.91 I still come up with the same answer. Maybe I'm not understanding your system. My results are a little different, due to rounding, but my loss totaled 18.96U. Better luck today.
Washington was a winner last night, that should bring the number down to where neilsy has it. I got off a little better last night, played cws to win and took lad run line which was a winner, also skipped Boston due to conflict with Texas, that saved me 3 big losses.
0
Washington was a winner last night, that should bring the number down to where neilsy has it. I got off a little better last night, played cws to win and took lad run line which was a winner, also skipped Boston due to conflict with Texas, that saved me 3 big losses.
I'm trying to follow along to help out, a couple things about Friday games, should lad(hou to lose) have been a play? Also, how was balt a play? And what about Texas? I know Detroit was a play, but Texas is rolling.
0
I'm trying to follow along to help out, a couple things about Friday games, should lad(hou to lose) have been a play? Also, how was balt a play? And what about Texas? I know Detroit was a play, but Texas is rolling.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.