This one isn't rocket science. We take the top favorite everyday and play on a labby line. Since we are looking at high juice, I'm using a labby line of 4 numbers with each number being 1/4 (25%) of a unit.
This has already cleared 12 times this year. Starting today on SJ -230.
.25-.25-.25-.25
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
This one isn't rocket science. We take the top favorite everyday and play on a labby line. Since we are looking at high juice, I'm using a labby line of 4 numbers with each number being 1/4 (25%) of a unit.
This has already cleared 12 times this year. Starting today on SJ -230.
Sorry for the close to puck drop post above, will post earlier going forward. Let's assume $10 for a unit size. I would use $5 but that would possibly put us below some sites minimums on some bets.
Todays bet would be $11.5 to win $5, on SJ -230
2.5 - 2.5 - 2.5 - 2.5
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Sorry for the close to puck drop post above, will post earlier going forward. Let's assume $10 for a unit size. I would use $5 but that would possibly put us below some sites minimums on some bets.
I remember this system. I followed it a couple years ago. I think English Gent was the guy that started it.
Yes this was originally started by English Gent. he did both in regulation and OT. I recall the regulation system suffered some long lossing streaks. I'm just going with game results including OT and we'll see what happens.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by Audball:
I remember this system. I followed it a couple years ago. I think English Gent was the guy that started it.
Yes this was originally started by English Gent. he did both in regulation and OT. I recall the regulation system suffered some long lossing streaks. I'm just going with game results including OT and we'll see what happens.
Yes this was originally started by English Gent. he did both in regulation and OT. I recall the regulation system suffered some long lossing streaks. I'm just going with game results including OT and we'll see what happens.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
Yes this was originally started by English Gent. he did both in regulation and OT. I recall the regulation system suffered some long lossing streaks. I'm just going with game results including OT and we'll see what happens.
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. Buffalo should not be taken lightly however as we saw first hand last night.
Good luck Dan
Yes they are playing better. Even fading a .500 team is good for a labby line - add a number, then mark off 2, add a number or 2, then mark off 2 or 4. Can't see Buffalo going on a big win streak, but you never know.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. Buffalo should not be taken lightly however as we saw first hand last night.
Good luck Dan
Yes they are playing better. Even fading a .500 team is good for a labby line - add a number, then mark off 2, add a number or 2, then mark off 2 or 4. Can't see Buffalo going on a big win streak, but you never know.
Whats the furthest you can recall getting out on one these labbys for this system? Like how many numbers past the original 4 or 5? I like this, just curious how bad the runs could get, doesn't really seem like they could get too bad since you're always on a big fave
0
Whats the furthest you can recall getting out on one these labbys for this system? Like how many numbers past the original 4 or 5? I like this, just curious how bad the runs could get, doesn't really seem like they could get too bad since you're always on a big fave
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. "Buffalo should not be taken lightly, however as we saw first hand last night".
Good luck Dan
excellent commentery, you seen it coming, at +260 ML the Sabres WIN 2-1 regardless of any system, win or lose, you can't make money taking -300 ML favorites, especially when it comes to the NHL. Dan doesn't deny the fact that this system is far from rocket science material, he must really be bored to even consider an effort on behalf of this system, does it WIN? yes, unfortunately this is about 'making money', playing the highest favorite on the board (on a 1/5 ratio) will, however, put gas in his car to cover the expense of driving to Stations sportsbook, a perfect system for the brainless, clueless, novice, unfamiliar with how the NHLworks, and has a limited BR using $10 units (more concerned with merley winning, than actually making money) "no such thing as a bad profit though" well said d_opie, profit comes in many forms, and levels. MM will always over-power winning % that's not opinionated, it's the statistical facts relating to sports wagering, and betting high level favorites in particular;
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. "Buffalo should not be taken lightly, however as we saw first hand last night".
Good luck Dan
excellent commentery, you seen it coming, at +260 ML the Sabres WIN 2-1 regardless of any system, win or lose, you can't make money taking -300 ML favorites, especially when it comes to the NHL. Dan doesn't deny the fact that this system is far from rocket science material, he must really be bored to even consider an effort on behalf of this system, does it WIN? yes, unfortunately this is about 'making money', playing the highest favorite on the board (on a 1/5 ratio) will, however, put gas in his car to cover the expense of driving to Stations sportsbook, a perfect system for the brainless, clueless, novice, unfamiliar with how the NHLworks, and has a limited BR using $10 units (more concerned with merley winning, than actually making money) "no such thing as a bad profit though" well said d_opie, profit comes in many forms, and levels. MM will always over-power winning % that's not opinionated, it's the statistical facts relating to sports wagering, and betting high level favorites in particular;
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. "Buffalo should not be taken lightly, however as we saw first hand last night".
Good luck Dan
excellent commentery, you seen it coming, at +260 ML the Sabres WIN 2-1 regardless of any system, win or lose, you can't make money taking -300 ML favorites, especially when it comes to the NHL. Dan doesn't deny the fact that this system is far from rocket science material, he must really be bored to even consider an effort on behalf of this system, does it WIN? yes, unfortunately this is about 'making money', playing the highest favorite on the board (on a 1/5 ratio) will, however, put gas in his car to cover the expense of driving to Stations sportsbook, a perfect system for the brainless, clueless, novice, unfamiliar with how the NHLworks, and has a limited BR using $10 units (more concerned with merley winning, than actually making money) "no such thing as a bad profit though" well said d_opie, profit comes in many forms, and levels. MM will always over-power winning % that's not opinionated, it's the statistical facts relating to sports wagering, and betting high level favorites in particular;
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
This will be FADE Buffalo probably most nights. "Buffalo should not be taken lightly, however as we saw first hand last night".
Good luck Dan
excellent commentery, you seen it coming, at +260 ML the Sabres WIN 2-1 regardless of any system, win or lose, you can't make money taking -300 ML favorites, especially when it comes to the NHL. Dan doesn't deny the fact that this system is far from rocket science material, he must really be bored to even consider an effort on behalf of this system, does it WIN? yes, unfortunately this is about 'making money', playing the highest favorite on the board (on a 1/5 ratio) will, however, put gas in his car to cover the expense of driving to Stations sportsbook, a perfect system for the brainless, clueless, novice, unfamiliar with how the NHLworks, and has a limited BR using $10 units (more concerned with merley winning, than actually making money) "no such thing as a bad profit though" well said d_opie, profit comes in many forms, and levels. MM will always over-power winning % that's not opinionated, it's the statistical facts relating to sports wagering, and betting high level favorites in particular;
No problem. As you point out betting top faves is very difficult to grind out a profit. You are somewhat correct on the bored part. I need baseball back. Lol
There is a reason English Gent abandoned this method. At this point, I'll keep it running just to see how high these bets can get. A good learning tool to never actually bet like this. The two team parlays are looking like the way to go.
Appreciate your comments and insight. Oh and I bet online through CG mostly. Much better odds than stations. I might be spending more time in Mexico so I'll have to go with 5Dimes.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
No problem. As you point out betting top faves is very difficult to grind out a profit. You are somewhat correct on the bored part. I need baseball back. Lol
There is a reason English Gent abandoned this method. At this point, I'll keep it running just to see how high these bets can get. A good learning tool to never actually bet like this. The two team parlays are looking like the way to go.
Appreciate your comments and insight. Oh and I bet online through CG mostly. Much better odds than stations. I might be spending more time in Mexico so I'll have to go with 5Dimes.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.