todays game from email; june 16
todays game from email; june 16
yes but I missed it. to bad too because it was a D play. still had monster day. made 10 units at +150 average. have had really good past 2 days
yes but I missed it. to bad too because it was a D play. still had monster day. made 10 units at +150 average. have had really good past 2 days
these the plays for today?
Here are your Plus Money System picks for Thursday, June 17, 2010
Interleague :
Washington Nationals ML +170 C
Colorado Rockies -1.5 +145 B
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +185 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +140 A
these the plays for today?
Here are your Plus Money System picks for Thursday, June 17, 2010
Interleague :
Washington Nationals ML +170 C
Colorado Rockies -1.5 +145 B
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +185 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +140 A
Hi what's the record for this system?
Thanks
GL to all
the record in terms of W & L sucks. I only win roughly 43.5% of the games i play. anything over 42% turns a nasty profit when you follow the progression correctly. for example last season was 757-971 43.4% i was 214 games under .500 and still made over 20,000% ROI for the season
Hi what's the record for this system?
Thanks
GL to all
the record in terms of W & L sucks. I only win roughly 43.5% of the games i play. anything over 42% turns a nasty profit when you follow the progression correctly. for example last season was 757-971 43.4% i was 214 games under .500 and still made over 20,000% ROI for the season
Another important question!
Isn't it better to leave teams like Pittsburgh, Arizona, Baltimore out of the Fav to run line system??
I find it a good idea to bet them as a dog but I think you will delete a lot of losing series if you don't bet those teams on the run line.
What do you guys think??
I checked Pittsburgh and Arizona for 2005 and they had in total 4 losing series on the Run Line and only 1 as SU dogs. But those 4 losses from the run line = 60% And thanks to that you don't have any profit of the system for those teams in a whole season!
So maybe what you can do is: wait till april is over and than elminate the <40% teams on the -1,5 system. But do bet on them as SU dogs. What do you guys think ???
Another important question!
Isn't it better to leave teams like Pittsburgh, Arizona, Baltimore out of the Fav to run line system??
I find it a good idea to bet them as a dog but I think you will delete a lot of losing series if you don't bet those teams on the run line.
What do you guys think??
I checked Pittsburgh and Arizona for 2005 and they had in total 4 losing series on the Run Line and only 1 as SU dogs. But those 4 losses from the run line = 60% And thanks to that you don't have any profit of the system for those teams in a whole season!
So maybe what you can do is: wait till april is over and than elminate the <40% teams on the -1,5 system. But do bet on them as SU dogs. What do you guys think ???
MLB1234 - I just wanted to ask you if you really think if I started playing the system today for the remainder of the season, would it still be profitable?
Also, with your starting bankroll of $2,000, what is your bankroll as of today playing this system? Is it over $10,000 since the start of the season?
Also, are there any pitching filters for not playing a game. For example if you were playing against a top 25 pitcher in the league in ERA, would it still be a play?
Thanks
MLB1234 - I just wanted to ask you if you really think if I started playing the system today for the remainder of the season, would it still be profitable?
Also, with your starting bankroll of $2,000, what is your bankroll as of today playing this system? Is it over $10,000 since the start of the season?
Also, are there any pitching filters for not playing a game. For example if you were playing against a top 25 pitcher in the league in ERA, would it still be a play?
Thanks
MLB1234 - I just wanted to ask you if you really think if I started playing the system today for the remainder of the season, would it still be profitable?
Also, with your starting bankroll of $2,000, what is your bankroll as of today playing this system? Is it over $10,000 since the start of the season?
Also, are there any pitching filters for not playing a game. For example if you were playing against a top 25 pitcher in the league in ERA, would it still be a play?
Thanks
yes it will still be profitable. as for this season, no its not up $10,000 yet. there have been quite a few 1 run games this year that have slowed the progression compared to last season, but it is still up over 130% on the year. by seasons end it will be fine like always
MLB1234 - I just wanted to ask you if you really think if I started playing the system today for the remainder of the season, would it still be profitable?
Also, with your starting bankroll of $2,000, what is your bankroll as of today playing this system? Is it over $10,000 since the start of the season?
Also, are there any pitching filters for not playing a game. For example if you were playing against a top 25 pitcher in the league in ERA, would it still be a play?
Thanks
yes it will still be profitable. as for this season, no its not up $10,000 yet. there have been quite a few 1 run games this year that have slowed the progression compared to last season, but it is still up over 130% on the year. by seasons end it will be fine like always
well kind of hard question to answer, from 2005-2008 i only played dogs. 2008 was the worst year as it made 800% ROI for season.
well kind of hard question to answer, from 2005-2008 i only played dogs. 2008 was the worst year as it made 800% ROI for season.
Another important question!
Isn't it better to leave teams like Pittsburgh, Arizona, Baltimore out of the Fav to run line system??
I find it a good idea to bet them as a dog but I think you will delete a lot of losing series if you don't bet those teams on the run line.
What do you guys think??
I checked Pittsburgh and Arizona for 2005 and they had in total 4 losing series on the Run Line and only 1 as SU dogs. But those 4 losses from the run line = 60% And thanks to that you don't have any profit of the system for those teams in a whole season!
So maybe what you can do is: wait till april is over and than elminate the <40% teams on the -1,5 system. But do bet on them as SU dogs. What do you guys think ???
you can try to do this however makes you comfortable, im not changing anything about it, it works fine the way it is. as long as you are betting the correct % on each game and increasing your bet amounts to next level as your bankroll grows and decrease during bad runs, u cant lose $ on the season. it just wont happen
Another important question!
Isn't it better to leave teams like Pittsburgh, Arizona, Baltimore out of the Fav to run line system??
I find it a good idea to bet them as a dog but I think you will delete a lot of losing series if you don't bet those teams on the run line.
What do you guys think??
I checked Pittsburgh and Arizona for 2005 and they had in total 4 losing series on the Run Line and only 1 as SU dogs. But those 4 losses from the run line = 60% And thanks to that you don't have any profit of the system for those teams in a whole season!
So maybe what you can do is: wait till april is over and than elminate the <40% teams on the -1,5 system. But do bet on them as SU dogs. What do you guys think ???
you can try to do this however makes you comfortable, im not changing anything about it, it works fine the way it is. as long as you are betting the correct % on each game and increasing your bet amounts to next level as your bankroll grows and decrease during bad runs, u cant lose $ on the season. it just wont happen
What are the plays for today?
Milwaukee Brewers ML +142 A
Los Angeles Angles ML +132 A
Philadelphia Phillies -1.5 +155 A
New York Mets ML +167 A
Chicago White Sox ML +165 A
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +145 B
Arizona Diamondbacks ML +170 C
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 +160 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +150 A
Florida Marlins ML +140 A
Kansas City Royals ML +164 A
Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 C
Baltimore Orioles ML +141 A
Seattle Mariners -1.5 +155 D
Here you go...
What are the plays for today?
Milwaukee Brewers ML +142 A
Los Angeles Angles ML +132 A
Philadelphia Phillies -1.5 +155 A
New York Mets ML +167 A
Chicago White Sox ML +165 A
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +145 B
Arizona Diamondbacks ML +170 C
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 +160 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +150 A
Florida Marlins ML +140 A
Kansas City Royals ML +164 A
Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 C
Baltimore Orioles ML +141 A
Seattle Mariners -1.5 +155 D
Here you go...
dont know, idont break it down that way, but if your asking if there are ever D losses, the answer is yes. there are plenty of D losses through out the season
dont know, idont break it down that way, but if your asking if there are ever D losses, the answer is yes. there are plenty of D losses through out the season
Milwaukee Brewers ML +142 A
Los Angeles Angles ML +132 A
Philadelphia Phillies -1.5 +155 A
New York Mets ML +167 A
Chicago White Sox ML +165 A
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +145 B
Arizona Diamondbacks ML +170 C
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 +160 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +150 A
Florida Marlins ML +140 A
Kansas City Royals ML +164 A
Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 C
Baltimore Orioles ML +141 A
Seattle Mariners -1.5 +155 D
Here you go...
Thanks buddy. I basically had the same plays except 2 of mine were different.
Cincy +142 (Why is Seattle a play? I thought it had to be between -105 to -140 for favorites and Seattle is -151)
Chicago Cubs -1.5 RL (Why is LAA a play? ML was +115 which is below +135 for dogs. Chicago is -122)
Please let me know who you came up with Seattle and Chc Cubs as plays? Otherwise I had all of the same plays for tonight. Thanks.
Milwaukee Brewers ML +142 A
Los Angeles Angles ML +132 A
Philadelphia Phillies -1.5 +155 A
New York Mets ML +167 A
Chicago White Sox ML +165 A
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +145 B
Arizona Diamondbacks ML +170 C
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 +160 A
Boston Red Sox -1.5 +150 A
Florida Marlins ML +140 A
Kansas City Royals ML +164 A
Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 C
Baltimore Orioles ML +141 A
Seattle Mariners -1.5 +155 D
Here you go...
Thanks buddy. I basically had the same plays except 2 of mine were different.
Cincy +142 (Why is Seattle a play? I thought it had to be between -105 to -140 for favorites and Seattle is -151)
Chicago Cubs -1.5 RL (Why is LAA a play? ML was +115 which is below +135 for dogs. Chicago is -122)
Please let me know who you came up with Seattle and Chc Cubs as plays? Otherwise I had all of the same plays for tonight. Thanks.
Thanks buddy. I basically had the same plays except 2 of mine were different.
Cincy +142 (Why is Seattle a play? I thought it had to be between -105 to -140 for favorites and Seattle is -151)
Chicago Cubs -1.5 RL (Why is LAA a play? ML was +115 which is below +135 for dogs. Chicago is -122)
Please let me know who you came up with Seattle and Chc Cubs as plays? Otherwise I had all of the same plays for tonight. Thanks.
yes u are right. I am on the REDS and had CUBS -1.5 as well
Thanks buddy. I basically had the same plays except 2 of mine were different.
Cincy +142 (Why is Seattle a play? I thought it had to be between -105 to -140 for favorites and Seattle is -151)
Chicago Cubs -1.5 RL (Why is LAA a play? ML was +115 which is below +135 for dogs. Chicago is -122)
Please let me know who you came up with Seattle and Chc Cubs as plays? Otherwise I had all of the same plays for tonight. Thanks.
yes u are right. I am on the REDS and had CUBS -1.5 as well
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.