OK boys here it is BET on any Team that lost 1st two games or 1st 3 games of series. like this L L or L L L
Only loser was Bo Sox got broomed by Brew crew
13 Wins 1 LOSS
92.8% YOUR fooking hated by every bookie; you r da man now
if you systems guys can back track to just last year i think we have a very simple system to use NO chasing here just wait for it to happen call it the After System
Here's your winners: most occurred on blood bath sunday the 6th it was dogs galore
1.) D Rays apr 3rd W
2.) NYY Apr 3rd W
3.) Cubbies Apr 3rd W
all these were on apr 6th 4.)CHI Sox W
5.)Balty O's W
6.)STROS W
7.)Rangers W
8.)WASH Nats W
9.)CUBBIES W (2 times on 3rd also)
10.) PADRES W
11.) REDS W
12.) Dodgers W
13.) D Backs W
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
OK boys here it is BET on any Team that lost 1st two games or 1st 3 games of series. like this L L or L L L
Only loser was Bo Sox got broomed by Brew crew
13 Wins 1 LOSS
92.8% YOUR fooking hated by every bookie; you r da man now
if you systems guys can back track to just last year i think we have a very simple system to use NO chasing here just wait for it to happen call it the After System
Here's your winners: most occurred on blood bath sunday the 6th it was dogs galore
I wanted to make sure before I posted the real results! I know there was 3 sweeps. I'm thinking only 10 or 11 not.
please exaplin what you mean by real results????
Are my results false? NO i dont think so.
All i said was i think it's a very simple system to use
AFTER a Team losses 2 straight gasmes of a 3 game series to BET on them in 3rd game to avoid the sweep or AFTER a team losses 3 games of a FOUR game series bet them to win the FOURTH game of the series
OF course now if a team lost 3 games alaredy before those losses
it's a losing streak of 5 or 6 games and that team would not be bet as per MLB history never bet against the streaks.
That is just handicapping when teams are losing keep fading them
so if a team got swept in one series and them loses 2 more games in next series that team is to be avoided and played against
EX LLL next series LL thats 5 straight losses this team would not be a play in 3rd game of second series.
SO those are just the parameters i feel should be used in tracking back last years results.
So JEFF i really want to know what are REAL RESULTS!
Because MY results all are shown in the W and L collomun
OOOOOOOOOO BTW i missed one above hold on let me go back and look at schedules
it should be 14 and 1 if i'm correct
would make it 93.3% REAL RESULTS WINNERS
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
I wanted to make sure before I posted the real results! I know there was 3 sweeps. I'm thinking only 10 or 11 not.
please exaplin what you mean by real results????
Are my results false? NO i dont think so.
All i said was i think it's a very simple system to use
AFTER a Team losses 2 straight gasmes of a 3 game series to BET on them in 3rd game to avoid the sweep or AFTER a team losses 3 games of a FOUR game series bet them to win the FOURTH game of the series
OF course now if a team lost 3 games alaredy before those losses
it's a losing streak of 5 or 6 games and that team would not be bet as per MLB history never bet against the streaks.
That is just handicapping when teams are losing keep fading them
so if a team got swept in one series and them loses 2 more games in next series that team is to be avoided and played against
EX LLL next series LL thats 5 straight losses this team would not be a play in 3rd game of second series.
SO those are just the parameters i feel should be used in tracking back last years results.
So JEFF i really want to know what are REAL RESULTS!
Because MY results all are shown in the W and L collomun
OOOOOOOOOO BTW i missed one above hold on let me go back and look at schedules
yes i missed one TWINKIES lost march 31st @ chi sox Lost april 2nd WON the 3rd game on april 3rd
so far REAL RESULTS are 14-1 this season 93.3% wins
i know i know it cannot be that strong after a year because many teams go on long losding streaks so they would not be a play on
just fade the losers stay on winners this is just something i think might have value every year i'm gueesing after a season the % will be in 60's I dont have time to back track 5 years nor do i wish to do it.
I think if we apply this now it will be very profitable
0
yes i missed one TWINKIES lost march 31st @ chi sox Lost april 2nd WON the 3rd game on april 3rd
so far REAL RESULTS are 14-1 this season 93.3% wins
i know i know it cannot be that strong after a year because many teams go on long losding streaks so they would not be a play on
just fade the losers stay on winners this is just something i think might have value every year i'm gueesing after a season the % will be in 60's I dont have time to back track 5 years nor do i wish to do it.
I think if we apply this now it will be very profitable
yeah ok mets got swept but i missed that cause one game was played MARCH 31st current schedules only show april and angels got swept again 1st loss was in MARCH 31st so i didnt see it only saw april results
but so the real results are now 12 wins 3 losses
80% winners ge whiz sorru Hat they dont show lists of schedules in yahoo sports i'll be more careful next time i post up a easy to follow system
80% is super great i presume tho after a full season it will be found out to be in 60% range 60 - 69 % if memory servers me correctly over past 25 years betting bases this was when i was winning bets after a team lost 2 straight games of a 3 game series or 3 straight games of a 4 game series.
so also why did you add in when those two teams in 4 game series LL W L not working ???
why was that added i cleral;y said 3 straight games of a FOUR game set or 2 stright of a 3 game set
also to avoid any team that lost 2 games of last series then lost 2 more stright i next series it's to be faded again because thats 4 straight losses and go on a longer losing streak
EXAMPLE team goes W L L 1st series Next SERIES L L we stay off them.
because now it's FOUR striaght LOSSES LL LL
0
yeah ok mets got swept but i missed that cause one game was played MARCH 31st current schedules only show april and angels got swept again 1st loss was in MARCH 31st so i didnt see it only saw april results
but so the real results are now 12 wins 3 losses
80% winners ge whiz sorru Hat they dont show lists of schedules in yahoo sports i'll be more careful next time i post up a easy to follow system
80% is super great i presume tho after a full season it will be found out to be in 60% range 60 - 69 % if memory servers me correctly over past 25 years betting bases this was when i was winning bets after a team lost 2 straight games of a 3 game series or 3 straight games of a 4 game series.
so also why did you add in when those two teams in 4 game series LL W L not working ???
why was that added i cleral;y said 3 straight games of a FOUR game set or 2 stright of a 3 game set
also to avoid any team that lost 2 games of last series then lost 2 more stright i next series it's to be faded again because thats 4 straight losses and go on a longer losing streak
EXAMPLE team goes W L L 1st series Next SERIES L L we stay off them.
yeah ok mets got swept but i missed that cause one game was played MARCH 31st current schedules only show april and angels got swept again 1st loss was in MARCH 31st so i didnt see it only saw april results
but so the real results are now 12 wins 3 losses
80% winners ge whiz sorru Hat they dont show lists of schedules in yahoo sports i'll be more careful next time i post up a easy to follow system
80% is super great i presume tho after a full season it will be found out to be in 60% range 60 - 69 % if memory servers me correctly over past 25 years betting bases this was when i was winning bets after a team lost 2 straight games of a 3 game series or 3 straight games of a 4 game series.
so also why did you add in when those two teams in 4 game series LL W L not working ???
why was that added i cleral;y said 3 straight games of a FOUR game set or 2 stright of a 3 game set
also to avoid any team that lost 2 games of last series then lost 2 more stright i next series it's to be faded again because thats 4 straight losses and go on a longer losing streak
EXAMPLE team goes W L L 1st series Next SERIES L L we stay off them.
because now it's FOUR striaght LOSSES LL LL
On the example LLWL your claiming that's as a win? What happens if you bet game 3 and it lost , bet game 4? What if that loses? An extra loss? Can't have both ways!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeyoulosers:
yeah ok mets got swept but i missed that cause one game was played MARCH 31st current schedules only show april and angels got swept again 1st loss was in MARCH 31st so i didnt see it only saw april results
but so the real results are now 12 wins 3 losses
80% winners ge whiz sorru Hat they dont show lists of schedules in yahoo sports i'll be more careful next time i post up a easy to follow system
80% is super great i presume tho after a full season it will be found out to be in 60% range 60 - 69 % if memory servers me correctly over past 25 years betting bases this was when i was winning bets after a team lost 2 straight games of a 3 game series or 3 straight games of a 4 game series.
so also why did you add in when those two teams in 4 game series LL W L not working ???
why was that added i cleral;y said 3 straight games of a FOUR game set or 2 stright of a 3 game set
also to avoid any team that lost 2 games of last series then lost 2 more stright i next series it's to be faded again because thats 4 straight losses and go on a longer losing streak
EXAMPLE team goes W L L 1st series Next SERIES L L we stay off them.
because now it's FOUR striaght LOSSES LL LL
On the example LLWL your claiming that's as a win? What happens if you bet game 3 and it lost , bet game 4? What if that loses? An extra loss? Can't have both ways!
if the first 3 games lose out of 4 then its a bet. or if first 2 games out of a 3 game series lose it's a bet. I take back my statement to play till augest 15th I think that's wrong. I think if played up till allstar break would be profitable. just because after allstar break winning teams tend to get hot. and lower teams fall away.
0
if the first 3 games lose out of 4 then its a bet. or if first 2 games out of a 3 game series lose it's a bet. I take back my statement to play till augest 15th I think that's wrong. I think if played up till allstar break would be profitable. just because after allstar break winning teams tend to get hot. and lower teams fall away.
I did it month to month in 2013 for american league april, may and june seem to have very profitable months wins and losses about even. I'm going to go back another 3 years.
0
I did it month to month in 2013 for american league april, may and june seem to have very profitable months wins and losses about even. I'm going to go back another 3 years.
MLB as you know is a game of streaks. IMO you should never bet against the streak either way. My research has proven that. With out fades' filters many times teams lose 2 or 3 series in a row being swept. so if you just take every sweep it adds 15 to 20 losses or more. If I not mistaken the average dog win price over a season is about +128 if I remember correctly. Use that as you may.
0
MLB as you know is a game of streaks. IMO you should never bet against the streak either way. My research has proven that. With out fades' filters many times teams lose 2 or 3 series in a row being swept. so if you just take every sweep it adds 15 to 20 losses or more. If I not mistaken the average dog win price over a season is about +128 if I remember correctly. Use that as you may.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.