Sunday results:
Tor/SD wins on the C game.
Record: 3-0
A: 2-1
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
For Monday 6/3:
Col 59.3% @ Cincy 59.3% Over
Oak 63.3% @ Mil 65.5% Over
For Tuesday 6/4:
Tampa 56% @ Detroit 64% Over
Minn 55.5% @ KC 56.5% Under
Balt 67.8% @ Hou 62.1 % Over
Mets 68% @ Wash 58.3% Over
Sunday results:
Tor/SD wins on the C game.
Record: 3-0
A: 2-1
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
For Monday 6/3:
Col 59.3% @ Cincy 59.3% Over
Oak 63.3% @ Mil 65.5% Over
For Tuesday 6/4:
Tampa 56% @ Detroit 64% Over
Minn 55.5% @ KC 56.5% Under
Balt 67.8% @ Hou 62.1 % Over
Mets 68% @ Wash 58.3% Over
Degen, I'll take a look at the spreadsheet in alittle bit, have some work stuff to do. I hate when work stuff gets in the way of gambling. lol
For Seattle, I have them at 12 unders, 11 overs at home so 52.2%. Not sure where the 56% is coming from.
Degen, I'll take a look at the spreadsheet in alittle bit, have some work stuff to do. I hate when work stuff gets in the way of gambling. lol
For Seattle, I have them at 12 unders, 11 overs at home so 52.2%. Not sure where the 56% is coming from.
Degen, I'll take a look at the spreadsheet in alittle bit, have some work stuff to do. I hate when work stuff gets in the way of gambling. lol
For Seattle, I have them at 12 unders, 11 overs at home so 52.2%. Not sure where the 56% is coming from.
Degen, I'll take a look at the spreadsheet in alittle bit, have some work stuff to do. I hate when work stuff gets in the way of gambling. lol
For Seattle, I have them at 12 unders, 11 overs at home so 52.2%. Not sure where the 56% is coming from.
Hilarious. I'll check it out in a bit. Hoping this is much easier than me tracking manually. Thanks!
Hilarious. I'll check it out in a bit. Hoping this is much easier than me tracking manually. Thanks!
I've kept track of the over unders on my own spreadsheet. I use the lines I've been getting from Station casions which is where I ahve my online account. So we could have a game or two where one of us got a Push while the other had the O/U. With as few games as we have had, that could move the % a few points.
I've kept track of the over unders on my own spreadsheet. I use the lines I've been getting from Station casions which is where I ahve my online account. So we could have a game or two where one of us got a Push while the other had the O/U. With as few games as we have had, that could move the % a few points.
I didn't keep track of the % of each team when played. I should have done that. As we get further into the season we won't see many teams at all with 60% (maybe the Pirates under at home). I'll track that moving forward and also figure out the plays that I did earlier and report back my findings.
I didn't keep track of the % of each team when played. I should have done that. As we get further into the season we won't see many teams at all with 60% (maybe the Pirates under at home). I'll track that moving forward and also figure out the plays that I did earlier and report back my findings.
I would not be opposed to that.
I would not be opposed to that.
Monday 6/3 results:
Oak/Mil wins on the A game
Col/Cin loses on A game and goes to B game Tuesday.
Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
For Tuesday 6/4:
Tampa 56% @ Detroit 64% Over
Minn 55.5% @ KC 56.5% Under
Balt 67.8% @ Hou 62.1 % Over
Mets 68% @ Wash 58.3% Over
Col/Cin B game Over
Monday 6/3 results:
Oak/Mil wins on the A game
Col/Cin loses on A game and goes to B game Tuesday.
Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
For Tuesday 6/4:
Tampa 56% @ Detroit 64% Over
Minn 55.5% @ KC 56.5% Under
Balt 67.8% @ Hou 62.1 % Over
Mets 68% @ Wash 58.3% Over
Col/Cin B game Over
Thanks for the new sheet. I have not been factoring Pushes at all, been treating them as a non-game. The more I think about that, it's probably the wrong way to go. Are you figuring it into the percentages just as a tie would lower a winning %?
Thanks for the new sheet. I have not been factoring Pushes at all, been treating them as a non-game. The more I think about that, it's probably the wrong way to go. Are you figuring it into the percentages just as a tie would lower a winning %?
Tuesday plays:
With Degen's spreadsheet, 3 plays that I had were filtered out using the Covers lines and factoring pushes. Since I do not factor pushes into the % and I use my local lines, any play that I have that is filtered out by the spreadsheet, I will make as unofficial plays and track seperately. Hope it's not too confusing.
Official plays:
Col/Cin Over B game
Balt/Hou Over A game
Official Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
Unoffical Record
0-0
Tuesday plays:
Tampa/Detroit Over A Game
Minn/KC Under A game
Mets/Wash Over A game
Tuesday plays:
With Degen's spreadsheet, 3 plays that I had were filtered out using the Covers lines and factoring pushes. Since I do not factor pushes into the % and I use my local lines, any play that I have that is filtered out by the spreadsheet, I will make as unofficial plays and track seperately. Hope it's not too confusing.
Official plays:
Col/Cin Over B game
Balt/Hou Over A game
Official Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
Unoffical Record
0-0
Tuesday plays:
Tampa/Detroit Over A Game
Minn/KC Under A game
Mets/Wash Over A game
Tuesday plays:
With Degen's spreadsheet, 3 plays that I had were filtered out using the Covers lines and factoring pushes. Since I do not factor pushes into the % and I use my local lines, any play that I have that is filtered out by the spreadsheet, I will make as unofficial plays and track seperately. Hope it's not too confusing.
Tuesday plays:
With Degen's spreadsheet, 3 plays that I had were filtered out using the Covers lines and factoring pushes. Since I do not factor pushes into the % and I use my local lines, any play that I have that is filtered out by the spreadsheet, I will make as unofficial plays and track seperately. Hope it's not too confusing.
I think factoring pushes is a good way to go. It will result in fewer plays but most likely stronger plays. On a 3 game chase if game 1 is a push, I end the chase (no 2 game chases). If game 2 is a push we are down to a 2 game chase (1 and 3), so accounting for pushes is needed IMO as they don't help us. A team that is 14-11-1 should have an over % of 53.8% which accurately reflects 14 overs in 26 games.
There were a couple of games that Covers had as a push that I had as either an over or under. Covers might have had 8 as the number while my book had 7.5 or 8.5.
I think factoring pushes is a good way to go. It will result in fewer plays but most likely stronger plays. On a 3 game chase if game 1 is a push, I end the chase (no 2 game chases). If game 2 is a push we are down to a 2 game chase (1 and 3), so accounting for pushes is needed IMO as they don't help us. A team that is 14-11-1 should have an over % of 53.8% which accurately reflects 14 overs in 26 games.
There were a couple of games that Covers had as a push that I had as either an over or under. Covers might have had 8 as the number while my book had 7.5 or 8.5.
I think factoring pushes is a good way to go. It will result in fewer plays but most likely stronger plays. On a 3 game chase if game 1 is a push, I end the chase (no 2 game chases). If game 2 is a push we are down to a 2 game chase (1 and 3), so accounting for pushes is needed IMO as they don't help us. A team that is 14-11-1 should have an over % of 53.8% which accurately reflects 14 overs in 26 games.
There were a couple of games that Covers had as a push that I had as either an over or under. Covers might have had 8 as the number while my book had 7.5 or 8.5.
I think factoring pushes is a good way to go. It will result in fewer plays but most likely stronger plays. On a 3 game chase if game 1 is a push, I end the chase (no 2 game chases). If game 2 is a push we are down to a 2 game chase (1 and 3), so accounting for pushes is needed IMO as they don't help us. A team that is 14-11-1 should have an over % of 53.8% which accurately reflects 14 overs in 26 games.
There were a couple of games that Covers had as a push that I had as either an over or under. Covers might have had 8 as the number while my book had 7.5 or 8.5.
Ok, sorry to do this guys but after a few back and forths with Degen regarding how to handle pushes, had to make some changes. I'm scrapping unoffical plays. I will be looking at the push data and making a determination if a series is an offical play or not. Washington and TB are good examples. Considering the push data Wash is still at 53.85 and combined with Mets 64%, I'm making it an official play.
TB drops all the way down to 48.28% when pushes are factored - not a play.
Also, there needs to be at least a 3 game difference in O/U numbers so Minn at 12-14-1 is not a play. Sorry Degen for another filter.
Ok, enough talk, here are the official plays for Tuesday:
Official plays:
Col/Cin Over B game
Balt/Hou Over A game
NYM/Wash Over A game
Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
Ok, sorry to do this guys but after a few back and forths with Degen regarding how to handle pushes, had to make some changes. I'm scrapping unoffical plays. I will be looking at the push data and making a determination if a series is an offical play or not. Washington and TB are good examples. Considering the push data Wash is still at 53.85 and combined with Mets 64%, I'm making it an official play.
TB drops all the way down to 48.28% when pushes are factored - not a play.
Also, there needs to be at least a 3 game difference in O/U numbers so Minn at 12-14-1 is not a play. Sorry Degen for another filter.
Ok, enough talk, here are the official plays for Tuesday:
Official plays:
Col/Cin Over B game
Balt/Hou Over A game
NYM/Wash Over A game
Record: 4-0
A: 3-2
B: 0-1
C: 1-0
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.