Line is now 2-3 ($5unit)
Yest. results:
Pivot: Colo. over 5.5 win
W/ Fla. win 29.75
Ana. over 4.5 win 23.58
Ana. over 5 win 29.25
Minn. win 32.50 Days result: +$ 115.08
BANK:+$189.63
Line is now 2-3 ($5unit)
Yest. results:
Pivot: Colo. over 5.5 win
W/ Fla. win 29.75
Ana. over 4.5 win 23.58
Ana. over 5 win 29.25
Minn. win 32.50 Days result: +$ 115.08
BANK:+$189.63
Line is now 2-3 ($5unit)
Yest. results:
Pivot: Colo. over 5.5 win
W/ Fla. win 29.75
Ana. over 4.5 win 23.58
Ana. over 5 win 29.25
Minn. win 32.50 Days result: +$ 115.08
BANK:+$189.63
Line is 2-3 ($5unit)
Pivot: Pitt over 5 1.46
W/ Fla -1 2.22 x 20.00 to win 24.40
Colo. over 5.5 2.14 x 20.00 to win 22.80
Det. over 4.5 1.92 x 20.00 to win 18.40
Det. over 5 2.12 x 20.00 to win 22.40
Nyr. 2.49 x 20.00 to win 29.80
BANK:+$189.63
![]()
Line is 2-3 ($5unit)
Pivot: Pitt over 5 1.46
W/ Fla -1 2.22 x 20.00 to win 24.40
Colo. over 5.5 2.14 x 20.00 to win 22.80
Det. over 4.5 1.92 x 20.00 to win 18.40
Det. over 5 2.12 x 20.00 to win 22.40
Nyr. 2.49 x 20.00 to win 29.80
BANK:+$189.63
![]()
Well after a perfect day yesterday I have a total fail the next .
So I am going to discontinue this thread, I was attempting to prove that you can still make money without hitting that magical 52.4% success rate that you often hear about. My theory is that number is skewed due to it being for -110 odds only ,I feel that you can be successful with picking lower odds at a higher winning % and pairing that with other picks in a parlay or multiple parlays in this case where you can get odds of +100 or better, it can be done. The problem I find is MYSELF . I find that with trying to put out a thread every day I am forcing plays that I wouldn't normally make. So in retrospect this is actually hindering what I was attempting to prove. I still feel this can be successful if you pick your spots ,and never play more than a 2 game parlay. Over and out ![]()
Well after a perfect day yesterday I have a total fail the next .
So I am going to discontinue this thread, I was attempting to prove that you can still make money without hitting that magical 52.4% success rate that you often hear about. My theory is that number is skewed due to it being for -110 odds only ,I feel that you can be successful with picking lower odds at a higher winning % and pairing that with other picks in a parlay or multiple parlays in this case where you can get odds of +100 or better, it can be done. The problem I find is MYSELF . I find that with trying to put out a thread every day I am forcing plays that I wouldn't normally make. So in retrospect this is actually hindering what I was attempting to prove. I still feel this can be successful if you pick your spots ,and never play more than a 2 game parlay. Over and out ![]()
@rustie commitment to the winning edge of excellence.
'Spot' plays & Twin-parlays will take a handicapper to the highest level of sports wagering prosperity.
Based upon your skills, and innovation factors...
"It is what it is, and that's all that it is"...take care my brother. ![]()
![]()
@rustie commitment to the winning edge of excellence.
'Spot' plays & Twin-parlays will take a handicapper to the highest level of sports wagering prosperity.
Based upon your skills, and innovation factors...
"It is what it is, and that's all that it is"...take care my brother. ![]()
![]()
Thankyou sports-Net, I have learned something from this experiment . Mostly to stick to what you know, and don't force the bets, if there isn't one their then don't make it,
Good luck and prosperity in your endeavors ![]()
Thankyou sports-Net, I have learned something from this experiment . Mostly to stick to what you know, and don't force the bets, if there isn't one their then don't make it,
Good luck and prosperity in your endeavors ![]()
