All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Societic-Hustle's Computer Predicted System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15448
Posts: 215
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 2312
Posted: #101
Quote Originally Posted by like2betmore:

What if the 2 to 4 plays u decide to play lose while the others are winners.  How do you know which one will win or lose.  Now your getting into the business of handicapping the best plays. 

Imagine that.. actually havin to handicap games. Like, who DOES that anymore.. sheesh!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #102
[Quote: Originally Posted by TDHCentral] Been reading the last few days and see you are doing well, but are you keeping a record that you can post?  Thanks !


read post 90
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1889
Posted: #103
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture:

Imagine that.. actually havin to handicap games. Like, who DOES that anymore.. sheesh!

Thought this was a system thread. My bad. How accurate is your system if you start picking and choosing which ones to play.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #104
Play nice children
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 2312
Posted: #105
Quote Originally Posted by like2betmore:

Thought this was a system thread. My bad. How accurate is your system if you start picking and choosing which ones to play.



Actually, I partially agree with you.. but that's the problem with Systems. If you're using a System to generate your plays, that's great, but System plays should only be treated as strong leans. If you cap the game and get a similar lean, then it becomes a strong play. Why on Earth would you bet your valuable money on a game just cuz a computer says you have an edge, when you break down the same game and don't get the same conclusion?? Of course, that's granted you're good at capping, which most people aren't.

Take a look at the NFL Systems that are chasing Dallas.. System says play them, but anyone with a brain who breaks down the match-ups and caps the game, knows you're just throwing bad money after bad money.

Now, we don't know what the System in this thread entails, as it hasn't been revealed. So who knows what actually goes into it. But we do know it doesn't involve chasing, and it doesn't consistently pick heavy Favs.. and those are two big keys to success.

Good Luck tonight Societic-Hustle 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #106

My biggest problem is that system recommends too many bets daily:

Today on NBA alone it recommends:

Charlotte to Cover + OVER
Toronto to Cover + UNDER
Orlando to Cover + OVER
Denver to Cover
Phoenix to Cover
Dallas to Cover & UNDER

Thats just 10 bets for NBA for tonight, think about a weekend, with NBA, NHL, NCAAF & NFL.

Who wants to follow my 99 plays for Saturday & Sunday?
Would people even take me seriously and follow the plays?

I only post plays I make a bet on, and I make 1000€ bets, so posting 10, 20 or 30 bets a day is a no-no for me.

On the other side, I can get frustrated, like yesterday, bets I posted was 3-0.
But the system hit it right on every NBA game to cover and every NHL game to win incl OT except for Chicago Blackhawks.

Thats 9-1, but what if I was 1-9?
Then nobody would give a shit if I hit 65% all season.

Im "test-driving" the system until end of year and keeping track of results and decide then on what to bet & how many bets.

Time to time, when I got plenty of free time over Im posting game projections on my blog, but I'm currently owner of a pub so I dont get much time over.
It's out on the market for sale at the moment, when I sold it, I will post daily projections with leans so people who want to make lots of bet can decide for themselves.

Until then, I'm hoping Im going to be able to win at least 500$, hopefully 1000$ a week for those placing 100$ bets on Pinnacle.

Good Luck to everyone !

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1636
Posted: #107
Societic-Hustle  don't worry about playing too many games ...If you think it's a good bet then bet it...Just keep refining your "system" to hit a better win percent to win over the long haul...

btw...your 2 NBA picks tonight went 1-1

if you bet all the NBA system bets you would have gone a miserable 2-6-2...

sooooo...keep refining and let's win some dough...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1003
Posted: #108
For what it's worth, I'm a huge fan of your picks, and your record is badass. Gasman makes a good point though. Whatever filter you're using to determine which of your system bets you're actually going to play is working. I've upped my unit on your picks and I'm sure I'm not the only lurker doing so. Stay balanced and cheers, man!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 106
Posted: #109
"your 2 NBA picks tonight went 1-1"

How so, it was 0-2. Probably because I just found this thread yesterday and bet with them :P
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #110

He probably played ATS.

YTD: 32-18-3; + 12.828 Units

Todays action:

No Illinois vs Toledo

No Illinois -12 Points

-103 / 1.971 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.971 units)


Los Angeles Clippers vs New Orleans Hornets

OVER 192.5 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)


Los Angeles Lakers vs Minnesota Timberwolves

Los Angeles Lakers -16.5 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)


UNDER 216 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #111

Washington Capitals vs New York Rangers

Washington Capitals -0.5

+117 / 2.17 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.17 units)
 
 
Edmonton Oilers vs Carolina Hurricanes

Carolina Hurricanes -0.5

+111 / 2.11 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.11 units)

 
Toronto Maple Leafs vs Tampa Bay Lightning

Tampa Bay Lightning -0.5

+107 / 2.07 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.07 units)
 
 
Calgary Flames vs Colorado Avalanche

Colorado Avalanche -0.5

+135 / 2.35 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.35 units)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #112

Illinois Chicago vs Pittsburgh

Illinois Chicago +23.5 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)
 

 
Toledo vs Illinois

Toledo +29.5 Points 

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)
 

Louisiana Tech vs Texas

Louisiana Tech +20.5 Points 

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #113

YTD: 37-21-3; + 15,058 Units

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #114

Golden State Warriors vs New York Knicks

Golden State Warriors +4 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
Dallas Mavericks vs Memphis Grizzlies

Dallas Mavericks +1 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)
 
 
Philadelphia 76ers vs Oklahoma City Thunder

Philadelphia 76ers +9 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes.5
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #115

Buffalo Sabres vs New Jersey Devils

Buffalo Sabres (incl OT)

+115 / 2.15 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.15 units)
 
 

Boston Bruins vs Pittsburgh Penguins

Boston Bruins

+110 / 2.10 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 1.10 units)
 


St. Louis Blues vs Columbus Blue Jackets

St. Louis Blues (incl OT)

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
 
Toronto Maple Leafs vs Florida Panthers

Florida Panthers -0.5

-105 / 1.952 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.952 units)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 39
Posted: #116
Quote Originally Posted by Societic-Hustle:

Golden State Warriors vs New York Knicks

Golden State Warriors +4 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)

 
Dallas Mavericks vs Memphis Grizzlies

Dallas Mavericks +1 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)
 
 
Philadelphia 76ers vs Oklahoma City Thunder

Philadelphia 76ers +9 Points

-110 / 1.909 @ 5Dimes.5
(Risking 1 unit to win 0.909 units)



Do your numbers take into account the fact that monta ellis and iguadala are hurt?
 Both of these plays look great on a regular night but can GS and Phili keep up with their main dudes hurting?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #117
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 39
Posted: #118
Also, Caron Butler for Dallas
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #119

Quote Originally Posted by CobieLunsford:



Do your numbers take into account the fact that monta ellis and iguadala are hurt?
 Both of these plays look great on a regular night but can GS and Phili keep up with their main dudes hurting?

Yes

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1889
Posted: #120
rough start to college ball but everything else was dam solid make up for it in a big way.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 2998
Posted: #121
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 2312
Posted: #122
Sweet night, once again!

Keep that shit up!


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #123
Why did i play college basketball?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by Societic-Hustle:

Why did i play college basketball?



i was thinking the same,,lol, but if your syst has college basketball no problem, is only a bad day
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 763
Posted: #125

Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:




i was thinking the same,,lol, but if your syst has college basketball no problem, is only a bad day

It had every prediction right on Monday so I got carried away.
My fault.

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.