Chasing is a good way to make money, if you have the right system. But from the emails and PM's I've received, some still long for the straight up, no chase play when needed a play in a pinch.
Here's something that's not a chase, but follows a format of a system I used back in '05. The only difference is there's now a converging point to strengthen the play. And it seems to work well...
This is how it works:
Find a matchup where one team won their last game vs a team that lost their last game and play for the winner of the last game. This follows the streak of both teams giving momentum to the play.
The following is a match up between Brooklyn at home vs OKC. Brooklyn lost ATS their last game vs OKC that won their last game as you can see.
Ex: 01/27/14Toronto L 103-104 Regular Season L -4 O 190.5
01/29/14 @ Miami W 112-95 Regular Season W 4 O 202.5
So the play would be OKC.
These plays are also *Star* Rated based on the match up.
If both are 1-1, it's a 1* Play as in the example. You will see match ups of 2-2, or 4-4 as streaks go. Any time the number is uneven you go with the lowest number to rate the play.
Sound crazy? Check out these numbers over the last 5 years:
1 *Star* - (238-102)
2 *Star* - (168-54)
3 *Star* - (86-24)
4 *Star* - (49-39)
5 *Star* - (24-8)
So no chasing, just straight up plays.
Because none of the plays depend on the other, don't look for the numbers to math each other. But in the end, the stats say we'll make money...
GLTA
bD
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Chasing is a good way to make money, if you have the right system. But from the emails and PM's I've received, some still long for the straight up, no chase play when needed a play in a pinch.
Here's something that's not a chase, but follows a format of a system I used back in '05. The only difference is there's now a converging point to strengthen the play. And it seems to work well...
This is how it works:
Find a matchup where one team won their last game vs a team that lost their last game and play for the winner of the last game. This follows the streak of both teams giving momentum to the play.
The following is a match up between Brooklyn at home vs OKC. Brooklyn lost ATS their last game vs OKC that won their last game as you can see.
Ex: 01/27/14Toronto L 103-104 Regular Season L -4 O 190.5
01/29/14 @ Miami W 112-95 Regular Season W 4 O 202.5
So the play would be OKC.
These plays are also *Star* Rated based on the match up.
If both are 1-1, it's a 1* Play as in the example. You will see match ups of 2-2, or 4-4 as streaks go. Any time the number is uneven you go with the lowest number to rate the play.
Sound crazy? Check out these numbers over the last 5 years:
1 *Star* - (238-102)
2 *Star* - (168-54)
3 *Star* - (86-24)
4 *Star* - (49-39)
5 *Star* - (24-8)
So no chasing, just straight up plays.
Because none of the plays depend on the other, don't look for the numbers to math each other. But in the end, the stats say we'll make money...
And one other thing; the situations for both teams must match.
So the home team from the last game must be the home team in this game. If the team in question was on the road their last game, they have to be on the road for this game as well.
This may seem a little confusing, but I'll try to answer questions as time allows.
0
And one other thing; the situations for both teams must match.
So the home team from the last game must be the home team in this game. If the team in question was on the road their last game, they have to be on the road for this game as well.
This may seem a little confusing, but I'll try to answer questions as time allows.
Ok thanks for the clarification. For some reason I interpreted the "lowest number" as 2. It just drops to a 1. Got it.
Can you clarify on my chicago bulls example...if my thought process was correct or if I'm missing something.
So the home team from the last game must be the home team in this game. If the team in question was on the road their last game, they have to be on the road for this game as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmwdrk:
Ok thanks for the clarification. For some reason I interpreted the "lowest number" as 2. It just drops to a 1. Got it.
Can you clarify on my chicago bulls example...if my thought process was correct or if I'm missing something.
So the home team from the last game must be the home team in this game. If the team in question was on the road their last game, they have to be on the road for this game as well.
Find a matchup where one team won
their last game vs a team that lost their last game and play for the
winner of the last game. This follows the streak of both teams giving
momentum to the play.
It looks like HOME and AWAY streaks both SU and ATS but they have to be last game not away home home away but away away away.
0
Find a matchup where one team won
their last game vs a team that lost their last game and play for the
winner of the last game. This follows the streak of both teams giving
momentum to the play.
It looks like HOME and AWAY streaks both SU and ATS but they have to be last game not away home home away but away away away.
I think you are right If the HOME team won or lost there last game or games at HOME there next game will also have to be at home If the AWAY team won or lost there last game or games AWAY there next game will have to be away. ALL games will have to be won or lost by both SU and ATS IF THE WIN LOST situation fits it is a play
I think you are right If the HOME team won or lost there last game or games at HOME there next game will also have to be at home If the AWAY team won or lost there last game or games AWAY there next game will have to be away. ALL games will have to be won or lost by both SU and ATS IF THE WIN LOST situation fits it is a play
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.