All Forums | Systems & Strategies

The Magna Carta 2014

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 60122
Posts: 371
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 16
Posted: #226

I like this system, just one question.  Would one blow out not erase all the profit made so far on all 4 systems??

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #227
Quote Originally Posted by uslhockey:

I like this system, just one question.  Would one blow out not erase all the profit made so far on all 4 systems??

 


No
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1834
Posted: #228
ANY PLAYS TODAY?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #229
MC1 - (69-0)
1 - (41-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

1 - Texas, Cleveland, NYY


MC2 - (50-0)
1 - (26-24)
2 - (15-9)
3 - (6-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Pittsburgh, San Diego


MC3 - (21-0)
1 - (9-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Detroit Over


MC4 - (27-0)
1 - (10-17)
2 - (5-12)
3 - (4-8)
4 - (6-2)
5 - (2-0)

1 - CWS Under
3 - Miami Under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #230

How is Texas a play on MC1? Detroit is only home for 4 games. Same with Clev/Balt. I have Balt as a play on MC2 since Cleveland is starting  along road trip.

On MC2, Washington is only away for 4 games (Pitt).

I'm guessing you are making the 4 games series as a judgement call rather than a system play based on the original rules. I'm good with that just looking for clarification in case I missed something. Keep up the good work, much appreciated.

 

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #231
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

How is Texas a play on MC1? Detroit is only home for 4 games. Same with Clev/Balt. I have Balt as a play on MC2 since Cleveland is starting  along road trip.

On MC2, Washington is only away for 4 games (Pitt).

I'm guessing you are making the 4 games series as a judgement call rather than a system play based on the original rules. I'm good with that just looking for clarification in case I missed something. Keep up the good work, much appreciated.

 


I had a problem this morning with my with scoresandodds.com not putting up their matchup pages. Not only did it delay my posting, but it also caused issues with looking up the plays. They still don't have them up. The games you mentioned after looking on yet another site verifies it. Initially it looked as though they were 5 days, but were actually 4. 
I've posted the plays so I'll stand by them, but it was an error. Hopefully none of these go to G5. 

bD
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #232
Quote Originally Posted by bDnews:


I had a problem this morning with my with scoresandodds.com not putting up their matchup pages. Not only did it delay my posting, but it also caused issues with looking up the plays. They still don't have them up. The games you mentioned after looking on yet another site verifies it. Initially it looked as though they were 5 days, but were actually 4. 
I've posted the plays so I'll stand by them, but it was an error. Hopefully none of these go to G5. 

bD

Well Texas took care of business.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #233

hey bD, sorry if this has been posted already, but I have had a look and can't seem to find it.

I was just wondering if you have the historical break down of how many A-E bets.  Just curious as I am trying to develop a method of investments that would protect a 5 game loss if it were to happen.

Kind Regards,

RM

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 30
Posted: #234
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

How is Texas a play on MC1? Detroit is only home for 4 games. Same with Clev/Balt. I have Balt as a play on MC2 since Cleveland is starting  along road trip.

On MC2, Washington is only away for 4 games (Pitt).

I'm guessing you are making the 4 games series as a judgement call rather than a system play based on the original rules. I'm good with that just looking for clarification in case I missed something. Keep up the good work, much appreciated.

 


where are the qualifying rules to these systems? I have not been able to find them
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 1954
Posted: #235
Quote Originally Posted by bDnews:


I had a problem this morning with my with scoresandodds.com not putting up their matchup pages. Not only did it delay my posting, but it also caused issues with looking up the plays. They still don't have them up. The games you mentioned after looking on yet another site verifies it. Initially it looked as though they were 5 days, but were actually 4. 
I've posted the plays so I'll stand by them, but it was an error. Hopefully none of these go to G5. 

bD

It has been down for a 2nd day now..

It is a crucial tool for me..

BOL...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 58576
Posted: #236
Scoreandodds.com get their feed from Statfox which is working to
get back online, even their phone lines are out, that is causing the
problem with match-ups at web sites. Been that way all week.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #237

bD - Hope you don't mind me posting this but I show new series plays today for MC1 as Oakland (fade Tor). Your 3 plays from MC1 yesterday cleared (Tex, Clev, NYY).

For MC2 - SD game 2 with new plays today for TB and Atlanta.

For MC2 I'm also on game 2 of Balt (fade Clev) that you did not include yesterday as a conflict to MC1.

 

No idea how you figure plays for MC 3 and 4.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #238
MC1 - (72-0)
1 - (44-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

1 - Oakland


MC2 - (51-0)
1 - (27-24)
2 - (15-9)
3 - (6-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Tampa Bay
2 - San Diego, Baltimore, Detroit
3 - San Francisco


MC3 - (22-0)
1 - (10-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)


MC4 - (28-0)
1 - (11-17)
2 - (5-12)
3 - (4-8)
4 - (6-2)
5 - (2-0)

3 - Miami Under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #239
Did you miss Atlanta (fade Colo) on MC2?
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #240
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

Did you miss Atlanta (fade Colo) on MC2?

You are correct.

Atlanta is a G1 for MC2.

Good catch. Thanks.

bD
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #241
MC1 - (72-0)
1 - (44-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

2 - Oakland


MC2 - (56-0)
1 - (28-28)
2 - (18-10)
3 - (7-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)



MC3 - (22-0)
1 - (10-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)


MC4 - (28-0)
1 - (11-17)
2 - (5-12)
3 - (4-8)
4 - (6-2)
5 - (2-0)

4 - Miami Under
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 12648
Posted: #242
It was cool seeing the results from yesterday. Well done.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 251
Posted: #243
IMO, what's more impressive than a system without a loss, is if you just played Games 1-3 for 1u rather than doubling and quadrupling down, you are still killing it


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 155
Posted: #244
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 1431
Posted: #245
Good job! Looks like A's a lock today?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #246
MC1 - (72-0)
1 - (44-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

3 - Oakland


MC2 - (57-0)
1 - (29-28)
2 - (18-10)
3 - (7-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)



MC3 - (22-0)
1 - (10-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)


MC4 - (29-0)
1 - (11-18)
2 - (5-13)
3 - (4-9)
4 - (7-2)
5 - (2-0)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #247
MC1 - (72-0)
1 - (44-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

1 - Cincinnati, San Diego, Detroit, Baltimore
4 - Tampa Bay


MC2 - (57-0)
1 - (29-28)
2 - (18-10)
3 - (7-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - NYM, Seattle



MC3 - (22-0)
1 - (10-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Arizona Over, LA Dodgers Over, Oakland Over


MC4 - (29-0)
1 - (11-18)
2 - (5-13)
3 - (4-9)
4 - (7-2)
5 - (2-0)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #248
MC1 - (74-0)
1 - (46-28)
2 - (16-12)
3 - (9-3)
4 - (2-1)
5 - (1-0)

2 - San Diego, Detroit
5 - Tampa Bay


MC2 - (58-0)
1 - (30-28)
2 - (18-10)
3 - (7-3)
4 - (3-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - NYM



MC3 - (25-0)
1 - (13-12)
2 - (8-4)
3 - (2-2)
4 - (2-0)
5 - (0-0)



MC4 - (29-0)
1 - (11-18)
2 - (5-13)
3 - (4-9)
4 - (7-2)
5 - (2-0)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 98
Posted: #249
how can you say that if you go undefeated in the pick that was blind yesterday pusistes results

MC1 - (72-0)
1 - Cincinnati, lose
San Diego,  lose
Detroit,  lose
Baltimore win
4 - Tampa Bay lose

MC2 - (57-0)
1 - NYM,  lose
Seattle win

MC3 - (22-0)
1 - Arizona Over, win
LA Dodgers Over,  win
Oakland Over win

explain to me still undefeated friend or because you do not understand the system?
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 459
Posted: #250
Hey exdter, welcome to Covers. I see this is your second post here.

This is a chase system, if Spanish is your first language, please send me a private message and I will write to you in Spanish

These four systems are a five-game chase systems, in order to the system to register a loss, a game 5 should lose.

Today Tampa is making many people nervous, but still a loss is covered by profits obtainde up to date in these four systems, as well as M7 and 7IS systems.

You are required to increase the bet amount every time a game goes into the 2, 3, 4 or 5 progression.

I suggest you use discipline and Don't follow the system if you don't have at least 160 units in your bankroll.

If you really didn't undertand the system I hope this post was useful to you.

If you are a troll, I will know shortly.

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.