Strong lean on Mugu ML here, however betting against Halep before a slam final lately isnt a profitable wager...i gotta expect both players to bring their A game tomorrow and the match should be very competitve and close.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Over 21.5 games (-120)...2 units
Over 2.5 sets (+125)...half unit
Strong lean on Mugu ML here, however betting against Halep before a slam final lately isnt a profitable wager...i gotta expect both players to bring their A game tomorrow and the match should be very competitve and close.
This one was a tough one for me until I broke it down a little more. Both battle tested players. Both playing well. But I am leaning on Simona here because she has been the better player on clay this year. Mugu is 3-1 all time against Halep but with the only loss coming on clay. I don’t expect a Halep meltdown here as she has in the past. Don’t get me wrong, she still has hurdles to conquer (ie winning a major) similar to the ones Mickleson overcame in golf, however she seems as focused as ever during this tournament and despite losing to Svitolina in the Rome Finals, she had to take down a group of stars just to get there. (Osaka, Keys, Garcia, Sharapova in a row) Meanwhile Muguruza got bounced in the Rd of 16 in Stuttgart and Madrid + lost in the Rd of 32 in Rome. Halep has also had the tougher path to get here as Mertens and Kerber are more impressive wins than Mugu taking out Sharapova and a bunch of no names, including getting a retirement 2 games in against Tsurenko.
Give me Halep as a dog all day
Halep + 105 (2 units)
Parlay
Halep/Stephens +218 (1u)
Good Luck
0
This one was a tough one for me until I broke it down a little more. Both battle tested players. Both playing well. But I am leaning on Simona here because she has been the better player on clay this year. Mugu is 3-1 all time against Halep but with the only loss coming on clay. I don’t expect a Halep meltdown here as she has in the past. Don’t get me wrong, she still has hurdles to conquer (ie winning a major) similar to the ones Mickleson overcame in golf, however she seems as focused as ever during this tournament and despite losing to Svitolina in the Rome Finals, she had to take down a group of stars just to get there. (Osaka, Keys, Garcia, Sharapova in a row) Meanwhile Muguruza got bounced in the Rd of 16 in Stuttgart and Madrid + lost in the Rd of 32 in Rome. Halep has also had the tougher path to get here as Mertens and Kerber are more impressive wins than Mugu taking out Sharapova and a bunch of no names, including getting a retirement 2 games in against Tsurenko.
Meanwhile Muguruza got bounced in the Rd of 16 in Stuttgart and Madrid + lost in the Rd of 32 in Rome.
Muguruza went 4-2/62.5% in her 6 significant outdoor clay court matches (@Madrid & Rome) during her run into the 2016 FO which she won; she went 2-2/50% at those venues for her run-in this year. Trade 1 win for a loss from her '16 run-in and that would make for 3-3/50%, the same winning percentage as here. 1 result going the opposite way means she's not up to winning a Slam? Obviously not. For me Muguruza is one of those personalities that gets up for the big ones. That's seen in the fact that while she's won a mere 6 WTA titles, 33% of them are Slam titles. They say in tennis that you make your money outside of the Slams, and you make history inside of them. Muguruza is about history, she has that kind of mindset. She hired Sam Sumyk primarily because he piloted Azarenka to her breakthrough in Slam results. I'm not knocking your Halep pick generally speaking, I think it's a toss-up (I don't believe the 1st set winner will lose, unlike Halep's previous match), but I don't buy the reasoning that Muguruza's run-in results can be looked at as having anything concrete to say about this coming result. I'd be much more focused on the fact she hasn't dropped a set at this Slam to this point and that includes having faced 3 previous FO finalists & 2 previous winners in Stosur, Kuznetsova & Sharapova (& while Tsurenko retired, that match being played to the full wouldn't have interfered with upending that stat imo), while Halep has dropped 2 sets (against players - Riske & Kerber - who both do not like the clay of RG).
0
Meanwhile Muguruza got bounced in the Rd of 16 in Stuttgart and Madrid + lost in the Rd of 32 in Rome.
Muguruza went 4-2/62.5% in her 6 significant outdoor clay court matches (@Madrid & Rome) during her run into the 2016 FO which she won; she went 2-2/50% at those venues for her run-in this year. Trade 1 win for a loss from her '16 run-in and that would make for 3-3/50%, the same winning percentage as here. 1 result going the opposite way means she's not up to winning a Slam? Obviously not. For me Muguruza is one of those personalities that gets up for the big ones. That's seen in the fact that while she's won a mere 6 WTA titles, 33% of them are Slam titles. They say in tennis that you make your money outside of the Slams, and you make history inside of them. Muguruza is about history, she has that kind of mindset. She hired Sam Sumyk primarily because he piloted Azarenka to her breakthrough in Slam results. I'm not knocking your Halep pick generally speaking, I think it's a toss-up (I don't believe the 1st set winner will lose, unlike Halep's previous match), but I don't buy the reasoning that Muguruza's run-in results can be looked at as having anything concrete to say about this coming result. I'd be much more focused on the fact she hasn't dropped a set at this Slam to this point and that includes having faced 3 previous FO finalists & 2 previous winners in Stosur, Kuznetsova & Sharapova (& while Tsurenko retired, that match being played to the full wouldn't have interfered with upending that stat imo), while Halep has dropped 2 sets (against players - Riske & Kerber - who both do not like the clay of RG).
Halep is getting to stay/hit close to the baseline, and is targeting Muguruza's fh, not letting her get into any bh rhythm. They are the ingredients for her early 3-0 lead.
0
Halep is getting to stay/hit close to the baseline, and is targeting Muguruza's fh, not letting her get into any bh rhythm. They are the ingredients for her early 3-0 lead.
Inexcusable errors on Muguruza's part, as much as I was rooting for a 3rd set she had no business winning that match. She started gaining momentum up 4-2 in the second set only to lose 6-4. Not to mention during the 4-4 tiebreak she has a wide open shot and can't get it over the net. Frustrating to watch to say the least.
0
Inexcusable errors on Muguruza's part, as much as I was rooting for a 3rd set she had no business winning that match. She started gaining momentum up 4-2 in the second set only to lose 6-4. Not to mention during the 4-4 tiebreak she has a wide open shot and can't get it over the net. Frustrating to watch to say the least.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.